Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
22JUN

The squeeze is the LNG the ban misses

2 min read
09:56UTC

JKM printed $18.86/MMBtu on 12 June, more than doubling the arb against TTF to roughly $5.26/MMBtu and pulling Atlantic LNG cargoes east to Asia, away from Europe in injection season.

ConflictAssessed

The JKM-TTF arbitrage more than doubled, with JKM printing $18.86/MMBtu on Friday 12 June against a TTF equivalent near $13.6, up from a far narrower gap on 11 June 1. JKM, the Japan Korea Marker, is the Northeast Asian spot-LNG benchmark; the arb is the gap that decides whether a flexible Atlantic cargo sails east or west. The implied spread works out to roughly $5.26/MMBtu, a figure that should be read as approximate, because it converts the EUR-denominated TTF print into USD/MMBtu across a few-day date offset; the sourced anchor is JKM at $18.86 and the direction of the pull.

The arb had compressed to $1.225 in the week to 1 June before diverging from the flat prompt . At that compressed level a cargo sat near the round-trip threshold between basins. At roughly $5.26 the economics firmly favour Asia, and a flexible US or Atlantic Basin cargo routes east rather than discharging into Europe.

The direction is the opposite of what Europe needs in injection season, when terminals want every spare cargo. This is the genuine supply tightening in the briefing, and the 17 June ban does nothing about it, because the regulation covers pipeline gas, not seaborne LNG. The one force actually pulling molecules away from Europe sits entirely outside the measure's scope, which is why the prompt can fall through its floor in the same week a real tightening is underway.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

JKM is the Japanese-Korean Marker, the price tag on a cargo of liquefied natural gas (LNG) delivered to Japan or South Korea. It is set daily by S&P Global Platts, the same company that prices oil markets. When JKM is higher than the equivalent European gas price (TTF), ship operators load their gas cargoes in the US Gulf, Africa, or the Atlantic and sail east to Asia rather than west to Europe. On 12 June 2026, JKM printed $18.86 per million British thermal units while the equivalent European price was around $13.6. That $5.26 gap is more than enough to cover the extra voyage cost to Asia. So flexible cargoes that could have gone to European storage terminals during the summer injection season headed east instead. This is the market working exactly as designed, but the effect for Europe is reduced supply at a time when storage is already well below target.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Japan and South Korea entered mid-June with lower-than-seasonal LNG inventories after a cooler-than-average May that delayed the normal spring demand reduction. Chinese independent power producers simultaneously increased LNG spot procurement from mid-May as domestic coal prices stayed elevated, competing with Japanese utilities for the same Atlantic Basin spot pool. The combination pushed JKM to $18.86/MMBtu on 12 June from a base of roughly $15-16 in early June.

The Hormuz supply disruption since February 2026 removed Qatari long-term contract flexibility from the Atlantic spot market: LNG that previously appeared as spot supply to European terminals during periods of Asian demand softness now moves on restricted long-term routes. That structural reduction in Atlantic swing supply means the JKM arb threshold that pulls cargoes east is now lower, because the European buffer of spot Qatari supply that would have competed with Asian demand is absent.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    JKM-TTF at USD 5.26/MMBtu on 12 June pulls every uncommitted Atlantic LNG cargo east for the remainder of the summer loading cycle, reducing spot LNG availability for European storage injection by an estimated 5-8 cargoes per month.

  • Consequence

    The arb widening compounds the EU storage deficit: Europe needs LNG most when the arb is highest and JKM incentivises eastward diversion, creating a structural supply-demand misalignment during the critical June-August injection window.

First Reported In

Update #18 · TTF breaks the floor into the import ban

Bloomberg· 15 Jun 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
The squeeze is the LNG the ban misses
The widening arb is the one genuine supply tightening in the window, and it is the LNG the pipeline ban does not cover.
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance industry
Shipping and insurance industry
UKMTO counted about 20 US-facilitated Hormuz transits a day to 11 September against only 6 visible on AIS, with traffic still around 90% below the 138-a-day pre-war baseline. War-risk underwriters cannot price hulls they cannot see, or resolve whether the tanker El Gaia hit a mine, as Iran claims, or a missile and drone, as CENTCOM says.
European refiners
European refiners
European refiners, including Poland's Orlen, absorbed a roughly $26 gap between Dated Brent at $130.80 on 15 September and ICE Brent futures settling at $103.87 on 18 September, a spread that widened from $13.45 on 9 September rather than newly opening. Their futures hedges no longer cover what they now pay for physical barrels.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Aramco zeroed European term customers' October allocations and rerouted roughly 60 million barrels to Asia through Ras Tanura and Sohar, using Red Sea and Gulf terminal capacity built years ago to cut Hormuz exposure. Riyadh reallocated existing supply rather than negotiating a shortfall with Europe.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's energy minister Saad al-Kaabi told Bloomberg at the Qatar Economic Forum on 20 September that Bessent's two-year Hormuz-obsolescence forecast is wrong, and that Doha has deliberately built no bypass pipeline. Qatar's gas exports run through one waterway by choice, not oversight.
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran's foreign ministry and 130 Majlis deputies moved toward NPT withdrawal this week, with lawmaker Hossein-Ali Haji Deligani filing a triple-urgency bill on 20 September that Speaker Qalibaf has not yet scheduled. Tehran treats treaty membership as leverage still on the table, not yet spent.
Russia and China
Russia and China
Moscow and Beijing vetoed the Panel of Experts' renewal, maintaining Resolution 2231 lapsed in October 2025 and the 2025 snapback was never validly triggered, so the sanctions architecture the Panel enforces has no current legal standing. Both governments frame the veto as upholding law, not shielding Tehran.