Public buyers in nine member states gave about 97% of their awarded cloud lots to domestically registered providers between 2018 and 2025, the European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE), a Brussels free-trade think tank, found in a study published in October1. ECIPE counted 8,725 awarded lots on Tenders Electronic Daily, the EU procurement journal, in France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Italy, Denmark, Poland and Estonia. Counting the pan-European GEANT research-network framework, the domestic share is 88.9%; judged by the nationality of the ultimate parent company, it falls by 10 to 15 points.
Every lot framed in post-2019 sovereignty language, a small category in ECIPE's data, went to a home supplier. That framing covers national cloud-security labels such as France's SecNumCloud and Germany's C5, the GAIA-X data-sharing standard and clauses keeping data in the country. Under it ECIPE puts the sole-bidder rate at 46%, against 28% where no sovereignty language appears, though that figure rests on only 22 notices with bidder data. US platforms won no lot directly; their local subsidiaries won 16, or 0.2% of the total. At least 13 of 238 sovereignty-flagged awards name a US hyperscaler platform (one of the giant US cloud providers) underneath the winning provider. In ECIPE's words, "sovereignty attaches to the nationality of the operator".
Poland's proposed sovereignty test for state technology contracts would add one more national scoring rule to the same tenders. ECIPE aims its recommendations at four articles of the Cloud and AI Development Act (CADA), the Commission's June sovereign-cloud proposal.
European Digital Rights (EDRi), a digital-rights network, attacked CADA from the opposite flank on 8 October2. Citing CBRE, EDRi puts EU data-centre power consumption at about 13 GW by the end of 2026, and reckons CADA's aim of tripling capacity by 2035 would need about 39 GW. It argues the new sites would still rest on US investors and companies. ECIPE wants contracts opened across borders; EDRi wants a decentralised, open-source tech ecosystem run in the public interest.
