Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Iran Conflict 2026
25MAY

$200bn war bill not yet sent to Congress

2 min read
13:55UTC

At $800 million per day, the Iran war is burning through money Congress has not authorised and may not approve.

← Back to Two markets, two prices on one Iran dealJump to analysis ↓
ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Military operations are expanding while Congress refuses to pay for them.

Pentagon officials confirmed on 31 March that their $200 billion Iran war supplemental has not been formally submitted to Congress. 1 Republican leaders told the Washington Post they lack the votes within their own party. The US spent roughly $15 billion in the first 19 days, nearly $800 million per day, more than the entire annual budget of the US Coast Guard.

The funding gap matters operationally. The 82nd Airborne's Devil Brigade is deploying to Kuwait . The USS Tripoli arrived with 3,500 Marines. Three Pentagon sources confirmed planning for "weeks of ground operations" including an amphibious seizure of Kharg Island. All of this requires money Congress has not authorised. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed a forthcoming request but said the figure "could move." Heritage Foundation president Kevin Roberts endorsed the Republican resistance.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The US military has been spending roughly $800 million every day on this war. To keep going, the Pentagon needs Congress to approve a special $200 billion funding package on top of the normal defence budget. That package has not been submitted to Congress yet. Republican leaders, from the president's own party, have said they do not have enough votes to pass it. The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank that helped write Trump's policy agenda, is backing the resistance. The practical problem is that the US has already committed ground troops to Kuwait and is planning to seize an Iranian oil island. All of that requires money Congress has not authorised.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    Without supplemental authorisation, ground force deployments and Kharg Island planning may outpace available funding, creating a legal and operational crisis simultaneously.

    Short term · 0.75
  • Consequence

    Republican resistance from within the president's own party removes the political safety net that a bipartisan supplemental would normally provide.

    Immediate · 0.85
  • Opportunity

    The funding gap creates domestic leverage for a negotiated settlement: if the war cannot be funded at current scale, a deal becomes financially necessary regardless of military preference.

    Short term · 0.7
Sources:Washington Post
Mentions:Kharg Island →Kuwait →USS Tripoli →Pete Hegseth →Kevin Roberts →Pentagon →Heritage Foundation →
First Reported In

Update #53 · Trump drops Hormuz goal; toll becomes law

Washington Post· 31 Mar 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
Caused by
Trump extends grid deadline to 6 April
The Pentagon's unfunded $200 billion request funds operations extended by the 6 April deadline; without it, ground operations lack financial authorisation.
Occurred 27 Mar 2026
Read story →
This Event
$200bn war bill not yet sent to Congress
Without the $200 billion supplemental, the military expansion (ground troops, amphibious planning, interceptor replenishment) lacks financial authorisation.
Different Perspectives
Lloyd's of London
Lloyd's of London
The Joint War Committee left Hormuz war-risk premiums at $10-14 million per voyage on 25 May, declining to move on Brent's 5% fall. The JWC's protocol requires a UN Security Council resolution or bilateral government certification letter before de-listing, and neither has arrived: a verbal understanding does not satisfy the formal condition the reinsurance market's treaty terms require.
Gulf Arab producers
Gulf Arab producers
Saudi Arabia and UAE depend on Hormuz for their own crude exports; Aramco CEO Nasser has warned no oil market recovery arrives until 2027 if the blockade continues past mid-June. Monday's $98.96 Brent settlement shortens nothing for Gulf producers without a signed instrument and a Pentagon mine-clearance timeline that runs up to six months post-ceasefire.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar holds $12bn of frozen Iranian assets at the centre of the sequencing dispute but cannot release them without explicit US Treasury authorisation, given the original freeze was a US instrument. As the asset-holding state, Qatar's leverage is real but passive: it is the escrow holder, not the decision-maker, and any resolution requires US Treasury sign-off that Trump has withheld.
Pakistan
Pakistan
With both Prime Minister Sharif and army chief Munir simultaneously in Beijing on 25 May, Pakistan has for the first time consolidated its civilian and military mediation tracks under China's roof. Munir's direct Tehran-to-Beijing flight signals that the security and financial threads of the sequencing problem are now being worked in parallel rather than sequentially.
China
China
Beijing hosted Pakistan's principal mediators and Iran's China envoy Ghalibaf simultaneously on 25 May while its banking regulator capped new state-bank lending to five sanctioned refiners. China is simultaneously the most credible third-party underwriter of the $12bn sequencing and the state whose institutions face live OFAC secondary-sanctions exposure if the deadlock persists through GL V's expiry.
United States
United States
Trump posted on 24 May that the blockade holds until a deal is certified and signed, ruling out the informal MOU structure both sides had been building. The 'certified, and signed' condition is the first operational bar Trump has attached in 87 days, but it arrived without an executive instrument, maintaining the gap between posted ultimatum and signed US policy.