Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
European Tech Sovereignty
3JUN

Iran's killing moves to the field

3 min read
10:43UTC

IRGC forces shot dead Kurdish activist brothers Meysam and Mojtaba Veisi near Dalahu on 28 May, and Faezeh Afshari, aged 30, at Semirom the same day, killings that leave no court record.

TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

Iran's Revolutionary Guard is now shooting activists dead in the field, leaving no court record to count.

IRGC forces shot dead two Kurdish activist brothers, Meysam and Mojtaba Veisi, near Dalahu in western Iran on 28 May, and Faezeh Afshari, aged 30, was shot during a crackdown at Semirom the same day. 1 The IRGC is Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the parallel armed force answerable to the Supreme Leader rather than the elected government. These were not hangings. The Norway-based Kurdish monitor Hengaw logged the deaths alongside judicial executions at Sanandaj, Bukan and elsewhere across the 28-30 May window. 2

A man shot dead near his home town by Revolutionary Guard forces leaves no sentence, no prison yard and no paper trail. The execution machinery Amnesty has been counting runs through courts, a bureaucracy that human-rights groups can audit. Field killings are faster and deniable, aimed at named Kurdish and political activists, and they sit outside the judicial register entirely.

The two tracks now run together. A protest detainee, Esmaeil Ramezanpour, was sentenced to death at Yazd on 29 May, showing the courts still grinding through the protest cohort even as the field killings begin. 3 The structural consequence is that Hengaw and Amnesty tallies will increasingly understate the real toll, because the deaths that matter most to the IRGC are now the ones it can deny. Tehran offers no acknowledgement of either track, and the count for the period rests on a single monitor.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran's IRGC (the Revolutionary Guards, the state's most powerful military force) shot dead three activists on 28 May: brothers Meysam and Mojtaba Veisi near the western town of Dalahu, and Faezeh Afshari, aged 30, in Semirom in central Iran. These were not legal executions carried out after a court process. They were shootings in the field, with no trial, no sentence, and no public announcement. A human rights monitoring group called Hengaw, based in Norway, documented these killings and has been tracking Iran's repression throughout the conflict. The difference between these field killings and the judicial executions Amnesty International counted (at least 39 since the war began) is that courts leave a record. Field shootings do not.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Kurdish border provinces, particularly Kermanshah, Kurdistan, and Ilam, are structurally overrepresented in IRGC field killings because IRGC border battalions in those areas operate under Joint Chiefs authority with minimal Interior Ministry oversight.

Dalahu (Meysam and Mojtaba Veisi's location) sits in Kermanshah province, where IRGC border units have maintained independent kill authority over suspected KDPI and PJAK operatives since the 2018 border-security decree. The killing of Faezeh Afshari at Semirom in Isfahan province on the same day extends the geographic footprint beyond the historic Kurdish border zone.

The wartime blackout, which kept domestic internet at near-zero until Pezeshkian's 25 May order, reduced the photographic and social-media documentation that typically constrains field operations. IRGC units accustomed to operating under information blackout may now face partial documentation risk as the internet partially restores to 40%, but the kill-decision timeline is shorter than the social-media reaction cycle.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    If field killings become a general counter-dissent tool rather than a border-region Kurdish practice, the human rights documentation pipeline built on judicial records loses coverage of a growing share of deaths.

  • Precedent

    Afshari's killing at Semirom in Isfahan province extends the geographic footprint of field killings beyond the historic Kurdish western-border zone for the first time in the wartime record.

First Reported In

Update #112 · Treasury opens a second Iran sanctions front

Hengaw· 30 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
European Central Bank
European Central Bank
The ECB's digital euro pilot drew more than 50 PSP applications and is naming 10 to 30 participants in July, advancing on its own monetary mandate without requiring a Commission act. Its trajectory this week is the inverse of CAIDA's: the sovereignty instrument that restricts no US firm is the only one keeping its published calendar.
United States (Ambassador Andrew Puzder / Steptoe LLP)
United States (Ambassador Andrew Puzder / Steptoe LLP)
Puzder named CAIDA a red line inconsistent with the EU-US trade framework on 25 May; Steptoe warns US firms spend up to USD 50bn a year on DMA and DSA compliance and that CAIDA's Buy European tilt threatens the Turnberry truce. The Google fine delay is read in Washington as evidence that Commission enforcement bends to diplomatic pressure.
France (G7 chair and Mistral AI)
France (G7 chair and Mistral AI)
France chaired the 29 May G7 Bercy ministerial and produced a communique that omitted cloud sovereignty entirely, while its national AI champion Mistral won five-year Airbus and BMW engineering contracts commercially the day before. Paris is advancing sovereignty through the market and retreating on it at every multilateral table.
Germany (federal government)
Germany (federal government)
Berlin maintained College silence that forced CAIDA's scope to public-sector tenders, protecting the automotive sector from a US Section 301 claim while simultaneously allowing BMW to contract Mistral for safety-critical crash-simulation work. German corporate procurement and German trade policy are running in opposite directions.
Netherlands (minister Willemijn Aerdts)
Netherlands (minister Willemijn Aerdts)
Aerdts blocked Kyndryl's EUR 100m Solvinity acquisition on 26 May, the first US deal ever stopped under Dutch screening, on the specific ground that the US CLOUD Act could compel disclosure of DigiD and MijnOverheid data. The decision is a direct demonstration that national screening achieves CAIDA's public-sector objective without waiting for EU law.
European Commission
European Commission
The Commission is presenting CAIDA adoption on its fourth scheduled date as a sovereignty milestone, with Henna Virkkunen due to brief the Telecom Council on 9 June. The narrowed public-sector-only scope is the concession written in to secure adoption; whether the Commission presents it as a floor or a ceiling for future revision is the open question.