Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
European Oil Markets
31JUL

$200bn war bill not yet sent to Congress

2 min read
09:33UTC

At $800 million per day, the Iran war is burning through money Congress has not authorised and may not approve.

← Back to Insurers shut Bab el-Mandeb to Saudi hullsJump to analysis ↓
EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

Military operations are expanding while Congress refuses to pay for them.

Pentagon officials confirmed on 31 March that their $200 billion Iran war supplemental has not been formally submitted to Congress. 1 Republican leaders told the Washington Post they lack the votes within their own party. The US spent roughly $15 billion in the first 19 days, nearly $800 million per day, more than the entire annual budget of the US Coast Guard.

The funding gap matters operationally. The 82nd Airborne's Devil Brigade is deploying to Kuwait . The USS Tripoli arrived with 3,500 Marines. Three Pentagon sources confirmed planning for "weeks of ground operations" including an amphibious seizure of Kharg Island. All of this requires money Congress has not authorised. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed a forthcoming request but said the figure "could move." Heritage Foundation president Kevin Roberts endorsed the Republican resistance.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The US military has been spending roughly $800 million every day on this war. To keep going, the Pentagon needs Congress to approve a special $200 billion funding package on top of the normal defence budget. That package has not been submitted to Congress yet. Republican leaders, from the president's own party, have said they do not have enough votes to pass it. The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank that helped write Trump's policy agenda, is backing the resistance. The practical problem is that the US has already committed ground troops to Kuwait and is planning to seize an Iranian oil island. All of that requires money Congress has not authorised.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    Without supplemental authorisation, ground force deployments and Kharg Island planning may outpace available funding, creating a legal and operational crisis simultaneously.

    Short term · 0.75
  • Consequence

    Republican resistance from within the president's own party removes the political safety net that a bipartisan supplemental would normally provide.

    Immediate · 0.85
  • Opportunity

    The funding gap creates domestic leverage for a negotiated settlement: if the war cannot be funded at current scale, a deal becomes financially necessary regardless of military preference.

    Short term · 0.7
Sources:Washington Post
Mentions:Kharg Island →Kuwait →USS Tripoli →Pete Hegseth →Kevin Roberts →Pentagon →Heritage Foundation →
First Reported In

Update #53 · Trump drops Hormuz goal; toll becomes law

Washington Post· 31 Mar 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
Caused by
Trump extends grid deadline to 6 April
The Pentagon's unfunded $200 billion request funds operations extended by the 6 April deadline; without it, ground operations lack financial authorisation.
Occurred 27 Mar 2026
Read story →
This Event
$200bn war bill not yet sent to Congress
Without the $200 billion supplemental, the military expansion (ground troops, amphibious planning, interceptor replenishment) lacks financial authorisation.
Different Perspectives
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
Sanctions compliance officer reviewing a Lukoil International GmbH bid
OFAC's amended FAQ 1224 gives a compliance desk its first published standard: full severance from Lukoil and a US-jurisdiction blocked account for sale proceeds. The conditions name neither ISAB nor Italy, so a Priolo Gargallo-linked bid answers a different question than a Neftochim Burgas or Petrotel Ploiesti one.
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
Managed-money funds on Brent Last Day
CFTC data for the week to 21 July showed managed money flipping 74,400 contracts to a net long of 15,665 against 1,410 short on the Brent Last Day contract, code 06765T. A fund that held that short through July has now covered it, and the spent short base raises the bar for the next leg higher.
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi crude exporters
Saudi-linked tanker transits through Bab el-Mandeb fell to about 7.5 a day after the 24 July underwriting withdrawal, pushing more barrels onto the longer route round the Cape or through the Yanbu terminal. Every diverted barrel ties up a ship for longer, and a fleet that turns slower charges more.
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Tanker owners on the Bab el-Mandeb route
Lloyd's-market syndicates withdrew war-risk cover from Saudi-linked hulls on 24 July, leaving owners of that class of vessel to sail Bab el-Mandeb uninsured or not at all. Tanker transits on the route fell to roughly 7.5 a day, and cover, once withdrawn, does not return on a shipowner's timetable.
Eni
Eni
Eni's board approved second-quarter results on 29 July, swinging refining EBIT to a EUR0.08bn profit from a year-earlier loss even as group profit doubled, and named Red Sea freight cost as a cap on that improvement. A refiner absorbing higher shipping costs on Saudi-linked crude while its numbers improve treats the freight line as a drag, not a crisis.
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian buyers (India, Japan, China, South Korea)
Asian refiners are absorbing 62% of Yanbu's 3.75m b/d flow, the bulk of Saudi Arabia's rerouted crude now clearing east rather than into the Atlantic basin. That destination split leaves Asian buyers more exposed to any single Yanbu-specific disruption than under the kingdom's normal multi-terminal export pattern.