Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
European Oil Markets
26MAY

WTI flips to +172,580 net long

3 min read
08:52UTC

CFTC Commitments of Traders for 19 May put NYMEX WTI non-commercial net long at +172,580 contracts, a 177,000-contract swing in three weeks that the Iran MOU then carried out four sessions later.

EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

WTI longs piled in on a supply story before the deal; the MOU then carried the offside position out.

CFTC Commitments of Traders for 19 May put NYMEX WTI-Physical non-commercial net long at +172,580 contracts, against net short -4,723 on 28 April 1. That prior short was the starting point logged in the 12 May report ; the swing since is roughly +177,000 contracts in three weeks. Brent Last Day went the other way, flipping to net short -24,966 from a prior +58,259, so the two benchmarks that normally track each other split hard 2.

The build is dated 19 May. The MOU landed four sessions later on 23 May. The crowd rotated max-long WTI on its own logic, the 7.9mb US crude draw and 134C legitimising Russian supply, not on any Iran headline. The deal punished a position already set; it did not create it. Reading the inversion as MOU-driven inverts the causation and mistimes the unwind risk.

The deleveraging has started: WTI open interest fell 78,977 week-on-week 3. The 29 May COT is the tell on how violent the carry-out runs once the $14 drop hits the offside length. On products, the compressing Brent-WTI keeps European gasoline in basin: TC2 sat around WS230 and $19,300/day on 7 May, and that arb stays shut at this spread, which traps EBOB length on the Continent.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Every week, the US futures regulator publishes a snapshot of who is betting which way on oil prices. On 19 May, that snapshot showed something striking: traders had shifted from betting oil prices would fall to a very large bet that prices would rise, all within three weeks. About 177,000 extra contracts swung from 'short' (expecting prices to fall) to 'long' (expecting prices to rise) on US crude. This build-up happened before Trump's Iran announcement and was fuelled by a big drop in US oil stockpiles and confidence that Russian oil shipments were legally protected. When the Iran news arrived on 23 May, those bets were suddenly caught on the wrong side of a falling market.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Two independent signals converged to drive the ~177,000-contract WTI repositioning. First, the 7.9mb US crude draw to 445mb (EIA, week to 15 May) signalled domestic refinery demand running ahead of import replenishment ; a fundamentals-based case for WTI long.

Second, GL 134C's 18 May reinstatement resolved the compliance-risk overhang that had kept managed money short WTI: when in-transit vessel cover was uncertain post-GL 134B, the trade was short WTI (domestic supply at risk) / long Brent (Atlantic-basin disruption premium). GL 134C closed that trade.

The Brent side inverted simultaneously: ICE Brent Last Day non-commercial flipped to net short -24,966 from net long +58,259, a reversal of ~83,000 contracts. This is the Brent long being unwound as the Atlantic-basin disruption premium from Hormuz closure deflated ; a two-leg rotation, not a unidirectional move.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    A net long of +172,580 WTI contracts (19 May) that started deleveraging before the Iran MOU implies the unwind was incomplete; next COT release (29 May, for 27 May positions) will confirm whether the remaining long was forced out on the $14 decline or held.

  • Consequence

    Brent-WTI compression to $1-2 from the prior $4-5 shuts the TC2 transatlantic gasoline arbitrage, trapping EBOB supply in the European basin and softening NWE gasoline barge premiums.

First Reported In

Update #2 · GL 134C reverses the cliff, Brent -$14

CFTC· 26 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Indian / Asian refinery buyers
Indian / Asian refinery buyers
The Adani $275m OFAC settlement for 32 Iran-LPG violations, posted 18 May, recalibrated the compliance-cost calculus for every Indian buyer holding Russian cargoes loaded under the lapsed GL 134B; GL 134C restores cover but the Cuba carve-out and the Cuba-tainted cargo class force per-voyage due diligence on the full logistics chain.
Shell / TotalEnergies NWE refining
Shell / TotalEnergies NWE refining
With BP Rotterdam's 400kbd dark on both crude units and the ICE Gasoil crack near $54/bbl as Brent fell $14, NWE refiners running full crude capture a crack-to-crude ratio of roughly 56%, well above the 30-35% historical norm; every barrel cracked into gasoil on non-Hormuz feedstock earns extraordinary margins.
VLCC owner / Baltic Exchange freight desk
VLCC owner / Baltic Exchange freight desk
The BDTI at 2,249 on 20 May is still pricing a war the market no longer fully believes; GL 134C removes the compliance bid from Baltic Aframax TD7 and TD19 ahead of any VLCC print, because owners reprice forced-rerouting premiums faster than they reprice an all-time-high composite index.
Goldman Sachs / Energy Aspects sell-side macro
Goldman Sachs / Energy Aspects sell-side macro
The Brent-Dubai EFS narrowing from above $6/bbl confirms the light-sweet war premium is deflating, not dead; the 30-60 day MOU window means the $14 Brent decline has priced a scenario where Hormuz is functionally open by July, leaving the flat price exposed to a re-spike if mine clearance stalls.
EU Council sanctions directorate
EU Council sanctions directorate
The 20th package's maritime-services ban deferral, contingent on G7 coordination at Kananaskis, reflects Hungary, Slovakia and Austria wielding the unanimity veto to block a measure that would raise NWE seaborne costs for states whose Russian crude arrives by pipeline and faces no freight exposure.
Rosneft / Russian export ministry
Rosneft / Russian export ministry
Russian export revenue at $19.0bn in March on Urals FOB ~$76/bbl, $28 above the G7 $47.60 cap, confirms the cap has no effective bite at current flat price; the shadow fleet's Russian-flag share rising to 21% shows Moscow absorbed Western vessel-services constraints by re-flagging out of P&I reach.