Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
European Energy Markets
22MAY

Trading desks stretch to 21-hour days

2 min read
10:26UTC

European energy trading hours have more than doubled from 10 to 21 hours as volatility forces round-the-clock coverage.

← Back to Germany cannot inject at this priceJump to analysis ↓
EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

Trading hours doubled to 21 per day; bank forecasts diverge by EUR 30/MWh on Hormuz timing.

European gas and power trading hours are extending from 10 to 21 hours per day, according to Bloomberg, a structural adaptation to sustained market volatility. The extension reflects the reality that price-moving events (Hormuz threats, ceasefire announcements, force majeure declarations) arrive outside traditional European trading hours, and desks that are not staffed miss the move.

Standard Chartered forecast TTF could breach the EUR eighty mark if the conflict remains unresolved at summer injection start. Goldman Sachs forecast Q2 TTF at EUR 50/MWh, but that assumes Hormuz normalisation by mid-April, an assumption already overtaken by events. That forecast gap captures the market's fundamental uncertainty: whether the strait reopens in weeks or months is the single variable that separates a manageable injection season from another winter of extreme price spikes.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

European gas and electricity traders are now working much longer days. The markets that allow energy companies, utilities, and industrials to buy and sell gas and power have extended their operating hours from 10 to 21 hours per day. This is because prices are moving so sharply, driven by news about the Hormuz disruption, that participants need more time to respond and manage their risk positions. Standard Chartered bank thinks prices could reach EUR 80/MWh if the disruption continues into summer. Goldman Sachs predicted EUR 50/MWh, but its forecast assumed Hormuz would normalise by mid-April, which has not happened.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The shift from 10 to 21 hours of trading reflects a practical response to a structural change in the volatility regime: when geopolitical events can move prices by EUR 5-10/MWh in a single session, and those events arrive on Middle Eastern time zones (which are 2-4 hours ahead of European market open), market participants face unhedgeable overnight gap risk under a 10-hour trading window.

Extended hours reduce the overnight gap risk by allowing participants to react to news as it emerges, but they also require 24-hour desk coverage for energy trading operations, increasing operational costs for smaller trading firms and potentially concentrating market activity among larger participants with the infrastructure to maintain extended desks.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    Goldman Sachs's EUR 50/MWh Q2 forecast was conditioned on Hormuz normalisation by mid-April. With that deadline passed, a Goldman forecast revision upward would signal that consensus market expectations are moving toward the Standard Chartered EUR 80+/MWh scenario.

  • Consequence

    Extended trading hours concentrate market-making capacity among larger institutions, potentially reducing liquidity during off-peak trading windows and widening bid-ask spreads for smaller energy buyers.

Sources:Bloomberg·OilPrice.com / Standard Chartered·OilPrice.com / Standard Chartered
Mentions:Standard Chartered →Goldman Sachs →Bloomberg →Prima →Russia →Ukraine →TTF →
First Reported In

Update #1 · Europe's thinnest gas cushion since 2018

Bloomberg· 13 Apr 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
This Event
Trading desks stretch to 21-hour days
The operational shift from 10 to 21-hour trading days is a structural adaptation that increases staffing costs and operational risk across every European energy trading desk.
Led to
TTF trades at EUR 42.26 on ceasefire hope
TTF decline to EUR 42 represents the lower bound of the Standard Chartered EUR 80+ warning range, with the gap dependent on whether the ceasefire holds through late April.
Occurred 15 Apr 2026
Read story →
Different Perspectives
OIES energy analysts
OIES energy analysts
Bruegel's EUR 26-44bn model was calibrated for 80% delivered; the 0.17 pp/day pace projects 55-65%, so the range now prices the wrong scenario. Absence of a revision at EUR 47-50 TTF is itself a signal: the EUR 35bn mid-range is becoming the operative sub-80% consensus.
German Economy Ministry / Bundesnetzagentur
German Economy Ministry / Bundesnetzagentur
The cabinet-approved gas plant auction law sets a first 9 GW tender for 8 September 2026 but does not address the 2026 injection gap. The Bundesnetzagentur's early-warning stage is active but operationally inert at 37% fill; Berlin has no statutory instrument to compel commercial injection.
EDF / CRE (French regulatory position)
EDF / CRE (French regulatory position)
France's 100% mandatory CRE-regulated storage booking is providing the EU-aggregate injection cover that Germany's abolished levy no longer can. EDF's 350-370 TWh full-year nuclear guidance anchors FR-DE spread economics through August; the September Flamanville-3 overhaul removes 1.6 GW at heating-season start, reversing the surplus that has suppressed Continental clearing all year.
QatarEnergy / Golden Pass commercial position
QatarEnergy / Golden Pass commercial position
The second Golden Pass cargo to Adriatic LNG demonstrates QatarEnergy retaining a commercial European supply position during the Ras Laffan force majeure through its 70% equity stake in the Texas joint venture. The ACER 58% US-share headline carries a Qatari component inside it; the provenance re-labelling is a structural feature of the post-Hormuz supply architecture, not a transitional anomaly.
Japanese and Korean utility buyers (JKM netback discipline)
Japanese and Korean utility buyers (JKM netback discipline)
JKM-TTF spread at USD 2.30 in the week to 7 May leaves Asian buyers with limited price advantage over European bids on spot Atlantic cargoes. At EUR 47-50 TTF, Atlantic LNG routing to Europe is commercially marginal; Korean and Japanese procurement desks see no incentive to release swing cargoes to Europe at JKM parity.
ACER / Teresa Ribera (European Commission)
ACER / Teresa Ribera (European Commission)
ACER's 58% US LNG share, cited by EVP Ribera, risks replacing one energy dependency with another after EUR 117 billion in US LNG since 2022. The 11 June workshop is the formal venue on both the REMIT compliance paradox and Germany's missing fill instrument.