Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
Drones: Industry & Defence
26OCT

Saudi tankers moved, Hormuz stayed shut

2 min read
15:07UTC

Three Saudi VLCCs reactivated their transponders and positioned roughly 10 million barrels near Hormuz on 19 June, the first such movement since the war began, yet zero eastbound transits completed.

TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

Three Saudi tankers probed Hormuz with 10 million barrels, but zero transits completed and Brent held near $80.

Three Saudi-owned very large crude carriers (VLCCs), the largest class of oil tanker, reactivated their AIS transponders in the Gulf of Oman on 19 June and moved or positioned roughly 10 million barrels near the Strait of Hormuz, the first Saudi tanker movement since the conflict began⁠1. AIS is the automatic tracking signal ships switch off to hide and on to be seen, so reactivating it is itself a public gesture. the strait still did not reopen.

The Lloyd's Market Association (LMA), the body that represents Lloyd's syndicates, said safety rather than insurance availability was suppressing traffic⁠2. The navigable channel remains uncleared, no minesweeping has been reported, and tracking data showed zero completed eastbound transits by Saturday 20 June. The movement reads as Gulf producers testing the water commercially, not as barrels flowing: the carriers approached a strait that has logged no foreign-flag transit since the war shut it, even after CENTCOM ended its blockade enforcement on 18 June.

Brent Crude, the global oil benchmark, held near $80 a barrel, little changed from its $78.66 close on 18 June, as the market priced the repositioning as a signal rather than a supply unlock⁠3. Roughly a fifth of seaborne oil normally passes through Hormuz, so a price that barely moved on the first tanker movement in months is the market saying the same thing the LMA did: until the mines are cleared, the barrels stay stranded in the Gulf of Oman.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Very large crude carriers, known as VLCCs, are among the largest ships in the world, each carrying around two million barrels of oil. Three Saudi-owned VLCCs switched on their tracking transponders and moved near the strait of Hormuz on 19 June, the first time Saudi tankers have moved toward the strait since fighting began. This looked like progress, but the ships did not actually pass through the strait. The Lloyd's Market Association, which represents British insurers who set shipping industry standards, said the problem is not insurance, which the Lloyd's consortium now offers, but physical safety: the channel has not been swept for mines, and nobody has officially declared it safe. Riyadh sends roughly 9-10 million barrels a day through Hormuz in normal times, giving Saudi Arabia as much to lose from a closed strait as any country. Moving three VLCCs into position on 19 June signals that Saudi planners expect the channel to open soon. Three VLCCs switched on their transponders and moved into position; none had passed through the strait by 20 June.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The VLCC repositioning reflects Saudi calculation that the political conditions for Hormuz reopening have advanced enough to justify moving assets into position, even before the physical channel is cleared. CENTCOM ended its 66-day blockade on 18 June; the Saudi decision to reactivate AIS the following day is a deliberate signal to markets that Riyadh expects commercial traffic to follow.

The divergence between the financial opening (blockade lifted, Lloyd's consortium launched, CENTCOM enforcement ended) and the physical closure (mines uncleared, zero transits, LMA safety warning) reflects the lag between political decisions and operational reality that has characterised the entire Hormuz closure. Floating mines require a minimum 40-50 days to sweep at standard naval minesweeping rates; a full channel clearance extends to six months.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Saudi Arabia repositioning three VLCCs near Hormuz on the day after the blockade lift signals Riyadh's expectation of a near-term transit window; if that expectation proves wrong, Saudi pressure on the US for a faster safety resolution will intensify.

  • Risk

    The LMA's confirmation that zero eastbound transits completed by 20 June means the Brent price near $80 incorporates a supply-resumption premium that has no physical cargo behind it, reprising the gap that opened on 18 June (ID:4310).

First Reported In

Update #133 · Lebanon froze the Iran deal

CNBC· 20 Jun 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
Nigerian Air Force
Nigerian Air Force
The air force listed 12 Turkish Aksungur and two Chinese CH-4D armed drones on 25 October. No contract has been published, so these are plans.
Civilians in Western Sahara
Civilians in Western Sahara
A UN report of October 2023 records allegations of Moroccan drone strikes east of the berm. An aerial strike there in November 2022 reportedly killed six civilians, the UN said, citing Polisario and local media.
Thunder Tiger
Thunder Tiger
The Taichung company said on 16 October that all 1,520 of its Gauntlet I attack drones passed inspection. Its MoU with AeroVironment covers fitting Switchblade to its uncrewed boats and ground vehicles and exploring joint production in Taiwan.
EDGE Group
EDGE Group
The Emirati group said on 9 October it will supply glide bombs and guidance kits for the Royal Moroccan Air Force's armed drones. A separate memorandum explores making small arms and aero engines in Morocco.
Rajnath Singh
Rajnath Singh
India's Defence Acquisition Council, which he chairs, approved about Rs 2.12 lakh crore of proposals on 26 October, including kamikaze drones and tank-mounted counter-drone systems. About 82 per cent of the value is to go to Indian industry, by the ministry's account.
Kongsberg
Kongsberg
The Norwegian group said on 13 October it will invest more than 200m zlotys in a Pomeranian plant to build and maintain SAN counter-drone systems. It expects series output to begin in the first half of 2028.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.