Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Drones: Industry & Defence
19MAR

Pulsar jammer unveiled in Riyadh

3 min read
08:30UTC

A tripod-mounted electronic warfare system unveiled at Riyadh's World Defense Show targets Gulf states facing sustained drone bombardment — and pairs with the C2 platform the Pentagon just adopted.

← Back to UK startup tops Pentagon's drone gauntletJump to analysis ↓
TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

Pulsar's Riyadh debut exploits compressed Gulf procurement cycles driven by active Shahed-class drone attacks.

Anduril unveiled Pulsar at the World Defense Show in Riyadh — a tripod-mounted electronic warfare system providing 360-degree RF detection and jamming against small drones. The system is self-contained and portable, designed for rapid deployment without integration into existing air defence networks. The venue and timing are calculated: Riyadh's biennial show is the Gulf's primary defence procurement event, and the region is under active drone and missile attack from the Iran conflict.

The demand signal is concrete. The UAE has intercepted over 1,350 drones and 230 missiles since hostilities began; Israel reports over 500 drones and 290 missiles launched against it. Gulf states need point-defence counter-drone systems that deploy in hours, not months. Pulsar targets the gap between integrated systems like Patriot — effective but expensive, slow to reposition, and designed for larger threats — and handheld RF jammers carried by individual soldiers, which lack the range and automation to protect fixed sites. The counter-UAV market, valued at $4.93 billion in 2025, is projected to reach $36.42 billion by 2035 at 22.14% CAGR according to GlobeNewswire research — and Gulf procurement is a disproportionate share of near-term growth.

The commercial logic ties directly to . Anduril's pitch bundles Pulsar with the C2 platform now designated as the Pentagon's counter-drone standard. For Gulf buyers evaluating interoperability with US forces — a consistent procurement criterion for Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Bahrain — a system feeding into the command layer used by American counter-drone units carries weight that a standalone jammer from a smaller vendor does not. Anduril is selling a network position, not just a hardware product.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Anduril brought a new drone-jamming device to an arms show in Saudi Arabia specifically because Gulf countries are under active drone attack and want to buy defensive technology fast. The device — called Pulsar — sits on a tripod and disrupts the radio signals controlling enemy drones within a 360-degree radius. The timing was deliberate. Countries under active attack buy defence equipment far faster than countries running peacetime procurement reviews. By showing up with an off-the-shelf product during a live threat, Anduril is converting a regional crisis into a contract opportunity — before the urgency fades and normal evaluation timelines reassert themselves.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

Pulsar's Riyadh launch illustrates a commercial model unique to active-conflict procurement: the demonstration-to-contract cycle collapses when buyers face live threats. Anduril is applying a ship-and-iterate philosophy to defence hardware. Pulsar was launched publicly before independent performance verification, on the logic that a deployed system attracting urgent buyers can be refined faster than a perfected system awaiting a peacetime request for proposals.

Root Causes

Gulf states' counter-drone architecture was designed around two threat tiers: high-end ballistic missiles addressed by Patriot and THAAD, and aircraft threats addressed by fighter interceptors. The Shahed-type one-way attack drone exploits the gap between these tiers. It is too cheap and numerous for cost-effective Patriot intercepts, and too small for fighter engagement at scale. Pulsar targets this architectural gap directly — one that Israeli systems such as Drone Dome partially fill but cannot address at Gulf-scale drone volumes.

Escalation

Gulf state counter-drone procurement has shifted from a planning exercise to an emergency acquisition cycle. Active-conflict procurement compresses evaluation timelines from 18–24 months to weeks — a dynamic that historically favours vendors with deployable, tested products over developmental programmes. The UAE's 1,350+ interceptions indicate threat volumes that structurally exceed existing point-defence capacity, sustaining procurement urgency beyond a single conflict event.

What could happen next?
  • Opportunity

    Active conflict in the Gulf creates a procurement urgency window that may allow Anduril to win contracts months ahead of normal evaluation timelines.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Consequence

    Pulsar's entry into the Gulf market directly competes with established Israeli electronic warfare counter-drone systems, potentially disrupting procurement relationships built over a decade.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Risk

    Deploying an unverified system during an active conflict creates significant reputational risk if Pulsar's field performance does not match its launch positioning.

    Immediate · Suggested
  • Precedent

    A successful Pulsar Gulf contract would validate the active-conflict go-to-market model for US defence technology companies, incentivising similar crisis-timed product launches by competitors.

    Medium term · Suggested
Sources:Breaking Defense·New Vision
First Reported In

Update #2 · UK startup tops Pentagon's drone gauntlet

Breaking Defense· 19 Mar 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
South Korea's Defense Acquisition Program Administration
South Korea's Defense Acquisition Program Administration
DAPA folded drone and roadside-bomb jammers into an 18-year, KRW 3.448 trillion K2 tank upgrade approved 11 August, rather than fund counter-drone kit as its own programme. Seoul is treating the threat as permanent enough to write into a platform's lifecycle, not urgent enough to buy ahead of it.
NATO Support and Procurement Agency
NATO Support and Procurement Agency
NSPA named five pre-qualified counter-drone suppliers under new framework contracts on 27 July, giving allies a purchasing route with no published budget attached. A framework without committed money is an instrument waiting for a spending decision, not a guarantee one is coming.
Ukraine's Ministry of Defence
Ukraine's Ministry of Defence
Ukraine's forces strike with more than 70 AI and computer-vision systems drawn from over 200 domestic producers, the ministry said on 18 August, a supplier base neither Washington's tariff fight nor Beijing's export licence touches. Kyiv is scaling capability faster than either government is writing rules for it.
A European drone-component manufacturer
A European drone-component manufacturer
A European manufacturer selling components into the United States faces the same 100 per cent tariff and 3 September deadline as any other foreign supplier, with the duty-free onshoring carve-out available only to firms building on American soil. That leaves it to absorb the cost, relocate assembly, or cede the US market rather than shop around a rival supply chain.
Chinese drone component exporters
Chinese drone component exporters
Exporters now need a case-by-case licence for each US-bound dual-use shipment after MOFCOM's 5 August order, with no published review clock. The same week Shenzhen logged nearly 200,000 domestic logistics-drone sorties and Hunan reported record spraying coverage, a home market large enough to absorb what the licence regime slows from leaving the country.
US drone manufacturers
US drone manufacturers
The onshoring carve-out protects Performance Drone Works' $820 million War Department loan, but the same 3 September deadline hits Red Cat Holdings and Unusual Machines, both filing over 500 per cent revenue growth on 6 August, on Chinese-sourced components with no qualified domestic substitute yet.