Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Drones: Industry & Defence
20AUG

Hegseth watches five laser weapons fire

2 min read
16:38UTC

Pete Hegseth watched five laser and microwave weapons fire at White Sands on 23 June, the first sitting US defence secretary to attend such a test.

TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

Hegseth watched five directed-energy weapons fire, a bet on cheap shots against cheap drones.

Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth watched five directed-energy (DE) weapons fire live at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, on 23 June, the first sitting US defence secretary to attend such a demonstration 1. Directed-energy weapons use lasers or microwaves rather than munitions. The line-up ran from AeroVironment's AMP-HEL laser at 20 kilowatts, through nLight's 50-kilowatt DE-M-SHORAD and Lockheed Martin's 300-kilowatt IFPC-HEL Valkyrie, to two microwave systems: Epirus's Leonidas and Raytheon's Coyote high-power microwave (HPM) Block 3.

A laser pulse costs a few dollars; the one-way attack (OWA) drone it burns down costs thousands, and a kinetic interceptor to stop that same drone can run to millions. Only cost-per-shot survives contact with drone mass, which is why a defence secretary turned up to watch electrons do the work.

AMP-HEL comes from the same AeroVironment now digesting a Space-segment writedown, a reminder that the DE contenders are the same names carrying the sector's production strain. France has already bought into the European end of this market, ordering Latvian BLAZE interceptors in June . The kilowatt figures, though, are demonstration numbers; the Army does not expect fielded systems at scale until late 2027, leaving years of dependence on the expensive interceptors lasers are meant to replace.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Pete Hegseth is the US Defence Secretary. On 23 June he became the first person in that job to personally watch a live test of laser and microwave weapons designed to shoot down drones and missiles. Five different weapons fired at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico: three lasers of increasing power, made by AeroVironment, nLight and Lockheed Martin, and two microwave weapons, from Epirus and Raytheon, which disable electronics across a wider area rather than burning through a single target. The idea is that these weapons cost only a few dollars per shot, far less than a missile that does the same job, which matters when an enemy can launch many drones at once cheaply.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The structural driver is an interceptor supply constraint, not laser enthusiasm: US industry's PAC-3 MSE production capacity has been targeted at roughly 500-600 missiles a year even after recent expansion, while a single large drone or missile salvo can involve well over 100 munitions, so the kinetic interceptor base cannot physically produce enough rounds to match salvo volume.

Directed-energy weapons are being fast-tracked specifically to close that mismatch with a cost-per-shot that scales with raid size rather than production-line capacity, which is why the demonstration paired five different systems, lasers and microwave weapons alike, rather than backing a single design.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Continued reliance on cost-per-shot economics rather than fielded systems means US forces stay dependent on expensive kinetic interceptors for salvo defence until directed-energy weapons reach scale, not expected before late 2027.

First Reported In

Update #14 · UK's £5bn drone bet follows Healey's exit

The Defense News· 5 Jul 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Hegseth watches five laser weapons fire
The demonstration put cost-per-shot at the centre of counter-drone policy, the only economics that holds against thousands of cheap attack drones.
Different Perspectives
South Korea's Defense Acquisition Program Administration
South Korea's Defense Acquisition Program Administration
DAPA folded drone and roadside-bomb jammers into an 18-year, KRW 3.448 trillion K2 tank upgrade approved 11 August, rather than fund counter-drone kit as its own programme. Seoul is treating the threat as permanent enough to write into a platform's lifecycle, not urgent enough to buy ahead of it.
NATO Support and Procurement Agency
NATO Support and Procurement Agency
NSPA named five pre-qualified counter-drone suppliers under new framework contracts on 27 July, giving allies a purchasing route with no published budget attached. A framework without committed money is an instrument waiting for a spending decision, not a guarantee one is coming.
Ukraine's Ministry of Defence
Ukraine's Ministry of Defence
Ukraine's forces strike with more than 70 AI and computer-vision systems drawn from over 200 domestic producers, the ministry said on 18 August, a supplier base neither Washington's tariff fight nor Beijing's export licence touches. Kyiv is scaling capability faster than either government is writing rules for it.
A European drone-component manufacturer
A European drone-component manufacturer
A European manufacturer selling components into the United States faces the same 100 per cent tariff and 3 September deadline as any other foreign supplier, with the duty-free onshoring carve-out available only to firms building on American soil. That leaves it to absorb the cost, relocate assembly, or cede the US market rather than shop around a rival supply chain.
Chinese drone component exporters
Chinese drone component exporters
Exporters now need a case-by-case licence for each US-bound dual-use shipment after MOFCOM's 5 August order, with no published review clock. The same week Shenzhen logged nearly 200,000 domestic logistics-drone sorties and Hunan reported record spraying coverage, a home market large enough to absorb what the licence regime slows from leaving the country.
US drone manufacturers
US drone manufacturers
The onshoring carve-out protects Performance Drone Works' $820 million War Department loan, but the same 3 September deadline hits Red Cat Holdings and Unusual Machines, both filing over 500 per cent revenue growth on 6 August, on Chinese-sourced components with no qualified domestic substitute yet.