Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
Data Centres: Boom and Backlash
24SEP

Cape Town approves five, names none

2 min read
13:52UTC

Cape Town has approved five data centres with two more under assessment, and the city will not name the operators or disclose their combined power and water demand.

IndustryDeveloping
Key takeaway

Cape Town withheld operator names and demand, leaving only the objectors' water and power estimates in circulation.

The City of Cape Town has approved five data centres, with two more under assessment, and has declined to name the operators or disclose their combined power and water demand, citing privacy, according to a report published on 4 September⁠1. The city's municipal planning tribunal consents these applications, and water availability is the constraint the objections turn on.

Nobody outside the city can add the five together, and a cumulative total is the calculation that decides whether a water-constrained city can carry them. The Legal Resources Centre, a public-interest law organisation that objected to two Equinix facilities before the tribunal, puts the water draw of those two sites at about 4.4 billion litres a year if conventional evaporative cooling is used. A separate assessment by Dr Chantelle van Staden puts their annual electricity consumption at roughly 1.4 to 1.5 billion kWh, which the same report compares to the use of a quarter of a million average Cape Town households⁠2.

Neither figure comes from the city or from Equinix, and both rest on a cooling assumption the operator has not confirmed. The electricity estimate is derived from an approved 174 MVA supply, and megavolt-amperes rate a connection rather than measure energy. Turning one into the other needs a power factor and assumed running hours, neither of which has been published, so the number cannot be checked by a reader who wants to.

Operators elsewhere have answered the resource question in public and invited exactly that checking. ZDATA said in July that treated wastewater supplies its Johor facility outright, a claim precise enough for anyone to check. In Cape Town no appeal has been confirmed as filed. The Legal Resources Centre's own case page still ends at its 13 July pre-hearing statement, which predates the tribunal's approval and records the organisation's position as a demand for full water and power disclosure before any decision, rather than a formal ground of appeal⁠3.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Normally when a council approves a big development, the public can find out who is building it and how much power or water it will use. Cape Town's council is allowed to keep that information private if a company asks, because it counts as commercially sensitive. That is legal, but it means nobody outside the council, other than the objectors doing their own estimates, can add up how much water five new data centres will actually need in a city that already worries about water shortages.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Cape Town's planning tribunal can lawfully withhold commercially sensitive information submitted by an applicant, and operators routinely request that protection for site-specific power and water figures on competitive grounds.

That legal basis for privacy exists independently of whether the aggregate demand of several approvals matters for a water-stressed city, which is why the tribunal's individual-application process produces no mechanism for publishing a combined total even when five approvals sit on the same register.

First Reported In

Update #14 · Brazil bill ties tax break to a water cap

Business Day (South Africa)· 8 Sept 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
This Event
Cape Town approves five, names none
The only figures describing five approved data centres come from the people opposing two of them.
Different Perspectives
Chilean data-centre developers
Chilean data-centre developers
Seven projects, one linked to Google, asked SEA this month for rulings that they fall outside full environmental review; four declared diesel-storage volumes just under the review-triggering tonnage, mirroring the mechanism Alto Jahuel used in July. The clustering suggests the threshold is being engineered, not sized to need.
An Coimisiun Pleanala
An Coimisiun Pleanala
Ireland's planning appeals body refused the €1.5bn Killala data centre on 17 September, overturning Mayo County Council's 2025 grant for lack of a fixed grid-connection agreement and no corporate renewable power-purchase agreement. The ruling makes matched-power evidence, not planning consent alone, the deciding factor.
Housing Assembly and Foxglove
Housing Assembly and Foxglove
The two groups' 6 August appeal, filed through the Legal Resources Centre, kept Cape Town's approval of Equinix's data centre suspended through this window over missing water, emissions, noise and diesel-generator data. Deputy Mayor Eddie Andrews confirmed on 20-21 September that the suspension holds.
Brazil (President Lula, signing Redata)
Brazil (President Lula, signing Redata)
Lula signed Lei 15.504 on 15 September, creating the Redata tax programme and keeping the Senate's water cap with no veto, while Aneel authorised Scala's AI City to join the national grid from January 2028. Brazil is recruiting capacity other markets are now turning away.
Aragon regional government (Eva Valle)
Aragon regional government (Eva Valle)
Aragon's economy chief Eva Valle said on 11 September that Spain's draft decree, requiring 80% hourly-matched renewables via a 10-year power-purchase agreement, is unmeetable by any project and threatens Blackstone, Azora and Microsoft builds already under way. Aragon holds 3,600 MW of granted grid access against 108 MW built.
Texas Governor Greg Abbott
Texas Governor Greg Abbott
Abbott ordered TCEQ on 21 September to halt every pending data-centre permit until projects pay their own way and complete ERCOT and Texas Water Development Board audits. Texas built the country's most permissive data-centre market; freezing it signals even that market has hit its grid limit.