Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
Data Centres: Boom and Backlash
8SEP

Cape Town approves five, names none

2 min read
13:06UTC

Cape Town has approved five data centres with two more under assessment, and the city will not name the operators or disclose their combined power and water demand.

IndustryDeveloping
Key takeaway

Cape Town withheld operator names and demand, leaving only the objectors' water and power estimates in circulation.

The City of Cape Town has approved five data centres, with two more under assessment, and has declined to name the operators or disclose their combined power and water demand, citing privacy, according to a report published on 4 September⁠1. The city's municipal planning tribunal consents these applications, and water availability is the constraint the objections turn on.

Nobody outside the city can add the five together, and a cumulative total is the calculation that decides whether a water-constrained city can carry them. The Legal Resources Centre, a public-interest law organisation that objected to two Equinix facilities before the tribunal, puts the water draw of those two sites at about 4.4 billion litres a year if conventional evaporative cooling is used. A separate assessment by Dr Chantelle van Staden puts their annual electricity consumption at roughly 1.4 to 1.5 billion kWh, which the same report compares to the use of a quarter of a million average Cape Town households⁠2.

Neither figure comes from the city or from Equinix, and both rest on a cooling assumption the operator has not confirmed. The electricity estimate is derived from an approved 174 MVA supply, and megavolt-amperes rate a connection rather than measure energy. Turning one into the other needs a power factor and assumed running hours, neither of which has been published, so the number cannot be checked by a reader who wants to.

Operators elsewhere have answered the resource question in public and invited exactly that checking. ZDATA said in July that treated wastewater supplies its Johor facility outright, a claim precise enough for anyone to check. In Cape Town no appeal has been confirmed as filed. The Legal Resources Centre's own case page still ends at its 13 July pre-hearing statement, which predates the tribunal's approval and records the organisation's position as a demand for full water and power disclosure before any decision, rather than a formal ground of appeal⁠3.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Normally when a council approves a big development, the public can find out who is building it and how much power or water it will use. Cape Town's council is allowed to keep that information private if a company asks, because it counts as commercially sensitive. That is legal, but it means nobody outside the council, other than the objectors doing their own estimates, can add up how much water five new data centres will actually need in a city that already worries about water shortages.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Cape Town's planning tribunal can lawfully withhold commercially sensitive information submitted by an applicant, and operators routinely request that protection for site-specific power and water figures on competitive grounds.

That legal basis for privacy exists independently of whether the aggregate demand of several approvals matters for a water-stressed city, which is why the tribunal's individual-application process produces no mechanism for publishing a combined total even when five approvals sit on the same register.

First Reported In

Update #14 · Brazil bill ties tax break to a water cap

Business Day (South Africa)· 8 Sept 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
This Event
Cape Town approves five, names none
The only figures describing five approved data centres come from the people opposing two of them.
Different Perspectives
Mohsen Rezaei
Mohsen Rezaei
The senior Iranian security official and former IRGC commander told Press TV that US-linked technology infrastructure in the region could become a target if war resumes. He named the UAE and valued the assets at more than US$2 trillion, without a breakdown.
Mykhailo Shelemba
Mykhailo Shelemba
Datagroup's chief executive says the Kyiv data centre hit on the night of 18 to 19 October is beyond repair. Services continue from backup sites, and no staff were hurt.
Kristen Umstattd
Kristen Umstattd
The Loudoun supervisor voted against fast-tracking Amazon's rezoning of the Ashburn campus. She said there were no figures yet on homes, school or road costs.
Akishima residents' litigation group
Akishima residents' litigation group
The group formed on 18 October and plans to sue Nihon GLP by year-end to stop eight data-centre buildings. Its lawyers will argue rights to life, health, clean water and a natural environment after mediation failed in August.
Óscar López
Óscar López
Spain's Digital Transformation minister said on 22 October he could not confirm when the data-centre decree will be approved. He added that Google has always committed to investing in Spain.
Google
Google
Google said it would comply with LVV's order to stop preparatory works at Muhos and Kajaani until environmental assessments finish. A spokesperson conceded the company had fallen short.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.