28MAY

Cuba's private-bank law, no licence yet

2 min read

08:42UTC

Thirteen days after Cuba's National Assembly legalised private banks, no first licence had issued and Gaceta Oficial No. 54 carried no implementing rule. Díaz-Canel says the reform answers Cuba's needs, not Washington's pressure.

← Back to Washington stacks three instruments at Cuba Jump to analysis ↓

PoliticsDeveloping

Key takeaway

Cuba legalised private banks on 18 June but had issued no licence by 1 July.

No first private-bank or exchange-house licence had been issued in Cuba as of Wednesday 1 July, thirteen days after the National Assembly passed a 176-measure market-opening package on 18 June . The reform authorises private corporate banking under the Banco Central de Cuba (BCC), the island's central bank, alongside non-bank microcredit lenders, a full crypto framework and foreign-currency accounts opened without prior state approval ¹. Gaceta Oficial No. 54, the official state gazette dated 29 June, carried no confirmed implementing rule.

Cuba's president Miguel Díaz-Canel told the Assembly the measures answer the island's own needs: "We are not doing this because of Yankee pressure" ². That claim deserves weight, because the package may be sovereign signalling that always expected the sanctions to bite rather than a bid for relief. Read either way, the licensing gap stays open: an announced reform still needs an opened bank behind it, and the correspondent-banking problem returns the moment a licence issues. Secretary of State Marco Rubio had already called the package insufficient and ruled out any sanctions relief .

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Cuba's parliament passed a huge package of economic reforms on 18 June, including a rule letting private companies run actual banks for the first time since the 1960s. Two weeks later, on 1 July, no such bank had actually opened. That gap matters because the reform is a promise on paper until Cuba's central bank issues the licences and rules that make it real. Cuba's official gazette, which normally carries that kind of technical detail, published its latest issue on 29 June with nothing in it about how a private bank would actually get approved.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

Cuba's central bank has never issued a private banking licence before. Its regulatory apparatus, examination standards, capital-adequacy rules and deposit protections were built to supervise only state banks, so a first-of-its-kind licensing round has no internal template to work from.

Separately, the reform's dollar-account provisions assumed a working correspondent-banking route that existed on 18 June and did not exist by 23 June, once BFI was designated. A licensing round for institutions that would still need to clear through a blacklisted bank has little practical purpose to rush.

What could happen next?

Consequence
Diaspora remittances and dollar savings continue moving through informal banqueros and CADECA rather than any new licensed channel.
Immediate · Assessed
Risk
A private bank licensed under the reform would still need a foreign-currency correspondent route, and BFI's 23 June designation removed the one that existed.
Short term · Assessed
Risk
The reform's own devaluation commitment, moving the peso from its official 555 rate toward the informal 670, has no private-bank price-discovery mechanism yet to help absorb it.
Medium term · Suggested

Source Landscape

This story draws on neutral-leaning sources

Immediately, the absence of a licence keeps remittance and dollar flows routed through informal banqueros and CADECA rather than any new private channel, since there is nothing yet to license into.

Structurally, the reform commits to moving the peso from its official 555 rate toward the informal rate, which sat at 670 on 1 July; a private banking sector was meant to help absorb that devaluation, and its absence leaves informal exchange houses as the only price-discovery mechanism in the meantime.

Consensus view: CEDA's Tamarys Bahamonde argues a two-week gap between the 18 June reform and a first licence is unremarkable, since the Banco Central de Cuba has never run a private-bank licensing round before and has no template to draw on.

Counter-view: Morrison Foerster's sanctions client alert reads the delay as structural rather than administrative: any bank licensed under the reform would still need a foreign-currency correspondent route, and OFAC's 23 June designation of BFI removed the one that existed six days after the reform passed.

Key tension: Whether Havana is simply drafting slowly or has legalised a banking sector with no viable foreign-currency plumbing to plug into.

Sources:OnCubaNews·Akerman LLP·Federal Register

Mentions:Banco Central de Cuba →Miguel Díaz-Canel →Marco Rubio →Cuba →Morrison Foerster →OFAC →Havana →Washington →Banco Financiero Internacional →

First Reported In

Update #9 · Cuba's dollar reform, no bank to clear it

OnCubaNews· 1 Jul 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

This Event

Cuba's private-bank law, no licence yet

The 176-measure reform stays enabling-only, with no bank yet licensed to make its dollar provisions real.

Led to

OFAC hits Cuba's main clearing bank

The reform's dollar-banking provisions cannot function because OFAC designated the clearing bank they would route through.

Occurred 23 Jun 2026

Read story →

Different Perspectives

Russia

Moscow has sent Havana solidarity gestures, including birthday messages to Raúl Castro, but no tanker has reached Cuba since the Sovcomflot Universal diverted away in May, and none arrived this week either. Russia's backing remains rhetorical while the fuel gap CUPET's designation created stays unfilled from any state-to-state source.

Observatorio Cubano de Derechos Humanos (OCDH)

The Madrid-based monitor published its half-year count of 1,949 repressive actions on 7 July, 299 in June, the highest monthly total it has logged in 2026, with independent journalists the most-targeted group. OCDH's figures moved the debate from sanctions cadence to security-state conduct in the same week Havana wanted the argument to stay on sanctions.

European Union (Stavros Lambrinidis)

Lambrinidis told the UNGA the embargo harms ordinary Cubans, then criticised Havana's Ukraine-ceasefire vote and Russian military participation, announcing no new measures. The EU is managing two separate Cuba files, human rights and Cuba's Russia alignment, that have not yet merged into one policy with teeth.

United States (Mike Waltz / OFAC)

Ambassador Mike Waltz held up photographs of named Cuban political prisoners, including Otero Alcántara, telling the delegation "this is not Havana", while OFAC issued no new Cuba designation between 1 and 9 July. Washington is running the prisoner-naming track and the sanctions track separately, and a re-charged Otero Alcántara would give the naming track a fresh case to press.

Cuban Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MINREX)

MINREX rebutted Mike Waltz's prisoner photographs at the UNGA debate, saying Cuba has nothing resembling the repression imagery Washington displayed, while giving no public account of Otero Alcántara's whereabouts. Havana's embargo case depends on external sanctions as the sole cause of harm, which a domestically caused grid failure and an unexplained disappearance both complicate.

Russia and China

Moscow and Beijing offered rhetorical solidarity but no relief. No Russian tanker has reached Cuba since the Sovcomflot Universal diverted on 26 May, and China has moved no substitute cargo, leaving Havana's fuel siege unbroken by its strategic partners.