Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Cuba Dispatch
8SEP

Supreme Court reopens Cuba land suits

3 min read
13:24UTC

The US Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on 23 June that Helms-Burton strips Cuban state entities of sovereign immunity, exposing Meliá and Iberostar to trafficking suits over property seized after 1959.

PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

The Supreme Court lets Cuban-American families sue Meliá and Iberostar over confiscated hotel land.

The US Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Tuesday 23 June that the 1996 Helms-Burton Act strips sovereign immunity from agencies and instrumentalities of the Cuban government, clearing US federal courts to hear "trafficking" suits against foreign firms that operate on property confiscated after the 1959 revolution 1. The Spanish hotel groups Meliá and Iberostar, which run resorts on expropriated land, are named as directly exposed.

Title III of the Act gives Cuban-American families whose land was seized a private right to sue in US court; the ruling removes the sovereign-immunity defence that Cuban state entities, and by extension their foreign partners, could once stand behind. Presidents waived Title III for more than two decades after 1996, and suits became possible only when the waiver first lifted in 2019. This decision goes further, stripping the immunity shield that survived even after that waiver lifted.

The ruling came from the judiciary on its own docket, not from Treasury. Two separate US institutions closed two separate channels in the same week, with no coordination shown between them: OFAC blocked transactions on 23 June while the Court removed an immunity shield the same day. Meliá had already begun ending management contracts on its Cuban hotels , and Iberostar and other chains pulled out of GAESA-run resorts before the 5 June wind-down deadline ; the decision raises the litigation cost of any Cuba footprint they have kept.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Cuba took over land and buildings from private owners after its 1959 revolution. A 1996 US law called Helms-Burton lets Americans whose property was taken sue, in US courts, any company now profiting from that property, even a foreign one. For years, US presidents used a waiver to switch that lawsuit right off, because it would have caused legal trouble for allied countries' companies. The Supreme Court's ruling removes one more legal defence, meaning Cuba's state-run businesses and the foreign hotel chains that partner with them, like Spain's Meliá and Iberostar, can be sued in the US with one fewer shield to hide behind.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Title III of the 1996 Helms-Burton Act has allowed US lawsuits over confiscated Cuban property since enactment, but every president from Clinton through Obama invoked the law's six-month waiver to suspend that right of action, judging the litigation risk to US allies too disruptive to activate. Trump's first administration let the waiver lapse in 2019, opening the door the Supreme Court has now widened by removing Cuba's sovereign-immunity defence.

The ruling did not create Title III exposure; it removed one specific defence, sovereign immunity for Cuban state entities, that firms like Meliá and Iberostar could previously raise. The judicial and Treasury tracks are now moving in the same direction without coordinating: Treasury set GAESA's wind-down deadline on its own timetable while this case worked through the federal docket on its own schedule.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Meliá and Iberostar lose the sovereign-immunity defence for any residual claim tied to GAESA-linked Cuban property, on top of the hotel management contracts they are already exiting.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Risk

    Other foreign operators of confiscated Cuban property, not just the two named Spanish chains, now face the same reduced defence in any future Title III filing.

    Short term · Suggested
  • Precedent

    The ruling extends a pattern in which the judiciary and Treasury are closing distinct Cuba-exposure channels on separate timetables without visible coordination between the two branches.

    Medium term · Suggested
First Reported In

Update #9 · Cuba's dollar reform, no bank to clear it

Moncloa· 1 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
China
China
Foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun called China-Cuba cooperation open, transparent and legitimate on 11 August, after the 6 August designations reached Cuban military attachés posted to China and Russia. The statement named no new assistance.
Russia
Russia
The Russian embassy in Havana said on 31 August that expanding BRICS full membership is not on the agenda, declining the upgrade Cuba had sought before the New Delhi summit. Moscow remains Cuba's most reliable outside supplier but stopped short of the diplomatic step Havana wanted.
Dominican Republic
Dominican Republic
The Dominican Republic ordered nine Cuban diplomats and their families to leave on 13 August without stating a reason, a rupture Havana has not been given an explanation for. Neither government has since clarified what prompted the expulsion.
Observatorio Cubano de Derechos Humanos
Observatorio Cubano de Derechos Humanos
OCDH's Madrid-based survey found 94 per cent of Cubans in extreme poverty and 84 per cent distrusting Havana's own reform measures, fieldwork closed three weeks before Decree 325. The group monitors from exile because independent rights monitoring cannot operate legally on the island, and Lowdown could not reach a comparable on-island voice.
Cuban government (Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla)
Cuban government (Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla)
Rodríguez answered the 3 September designations on Cubadebate the same day without naming any of the five sanctioned entities, calling the wave collective punishment. Havana has used the same anti-blockade framing for each prior wave rather than contesting individual designations.
US Treasury (OFAC) and State Department
US Treasury (OFAC) and State Department
OFAC designated Banco Exterior de Cuba and four traders on 3 September; its SDN entry links the individual named alongside them only to Alejandro Castro Espín. The State Department's own announcement, not OFAC's listing, called that individual "a grandson of Raul Castro" and the designated entities exploiters of Cuba's resources "for the benefit of the regime."