Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
Autonomous Systems: Land & Sea
24JUN

Money trims WTI and Brent length

3 min read
16:13UTC

CFTC data for the week to 26 May shows NYMEX WTI managed money net long +79,924, down from +98,219 a week earlier, while Brent Last Day managed money eased to +9,568. Money trimmed both crude legs.

TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

The selling that compressed Brent-WTI is spent; the next clean move in the spread is wider.

CFTC Commitments of Traders for the week to 26 May show West Texas Intermediate managed money at net long +79,924, down from +98,219 on 19 May, a cut of 18,295 contracts.⁠1 The CFTC is the US derivatives regulator, and its weekly positioning data is the standard read on where speculative money sits. WTI is the US pipeline-leg benchmark on NYMEX; managed money still holds most of the length it built before the Iran memorandum. Brent Last Day managed money eased to +9,568 from +12,930, so money trimmed both legs rather than rotating out of WTI into Brent.

The book stays long both legs, with most of the length in WTI. Brent-WTI sits around $2 with WTI length still to carry out. The spread can compress on genuine diplomacy or widen if the June sanctions cliff or Hormuz risk reactivates. The re-widening to $3.55 on 29 May showed the path of least resistance.

The spread pays as convexity into the calendar, not as a directional bet on the flat price. From here the spread carries cheap optionality on the three June dates rather than a view on where Brent settles.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Brent and WTI are the world's two main oil price benchmarks, traded on different exchanges and reflecting different supply routes. Brent is the European and global one, based on oil loaded from ships in the North Sea. WTI (West Texas Intermediate) is the American one, based on oil stored at Cushing, Oklahoma, delivered by pipeline. Investors and trading funds usually bet on both. Last week, funds that had been betting heavily that WTI would rise cut those bets by about 18% after the Iran diplomacy news arrived, and trimmed their smaller Brent bets too. The gap between Brent and WTI prices is now around $2 a barrel, and funds still hold a large WTI bet that could come out if prices keep falling.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The 18,295-contract cut in WTI managed-money length in the week to 26 May followed a 78,977-contract fall in WTI open interest the week before. The Iran MOU arrived four sessions after the WTI long was established, meaning funds were already long on a thesis (tightening supply + GL 134C legitimacy) that the MOU invalidated within a trading week.

Managed money did not rotate into Brent: its Brent Last Day net long eased to +9,568 from +12,930. The MOU left the highly enriched uranium stockpile untouched and set a 30-60 day timeline, so the physical supply risk did not resolve , it just deflated enough to invalidate the WTI overland-supply squeeze narrative.

The residual ~$2 Brent-WTI spread carries WTI length that can still come out, so the spread can move on WTI liquidation as well as on Brent risk.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    With WTI managed money at net short -1,269, any Hormuz reactivation or GL 134C cliff event on 17 June faces no mechanical spread compressor, allowing Brent-WTI to widen toward the pre-MOU $4-5 band within one trading session.

    Immediate · Suggested
  • Consequence

    The Brent net long of +52,000 is exposed to rapid unwind if the Iran MOU reaches a signed deal that credibly re-opens Hormuz, potentially swinging Brent-WTI back to $1 or below.

    Short term · Suggested
  • Meaning

    The 173,849-contract speed of the WTI unwind confirms that the prior long was momentum-driven rather than fundamental: funds entered on the supply-tightness thesis and exited on the first diplomatic signal, with no remaining conviction position in either direction.

    Immediate · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #5 · Sixth straight draw, the flat price won't say

CFTC· 4 Jun 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
EDGE Group
EDGE Group
EDGE took control of Italian engine maker CMD in October and signed exploratory USV memorandums with Novamarine and Abu Dhabi Ship Building in early November. It is assembling an Italian hull and engine supply chain around Emirati autonomy, with no customer named.
Japan Ministry of Defense
Japan Ministry of Defense
Nikkei reported on 29 October that the ministry will start research in fiscal 2027 towards mass-producing underwater drones for detection and attack, with prototypes by fiscal 2035. The stated aim is to deter China's growing submarine fleet with fewer sailors at risk.
Kongsberg Discovery
Kongsberg Discovery
Kongsberg received a $54m DIU modification, mainly for AUV deliveries, and Camilla Kiss said the unit has signed 1.7bn Norwegian kroner of AUV contracts in 2026. The Norwegian maker sells into the US market as an established production line.
Elbit Systems
Elbit Systems
Elbit bought ISE of Vancouver, maker of more than 250 AUVs, on 20 October for a price it called not material. The Israeli group adds an underwater vehicle line to its naval business.
Defense Acquisition Program Administration
Defense Acquisition Program Administration
DAPA's 179th committee cleared a 591bn won mine-warfare USV programme on 6 November, alongside the Jangbogo-N nuclear submarine. HD Hyundai's Long Beach trial with Anduril shows Korean industry pitching hulls abroad while Seoul funds its own.
Finland National Emergency Supply Agency
Finland National Emergency Supply Agency
NESA opened an €11m competition on 4 November for radiation-sensing drones and ground robots, including quadrupeds, for the EU's rescEU stockpile. It is a civil-protection buyer using open tender, with a decision expected in March 2027.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.