Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
AI: Jobs, Power & Money
21SEP

US states legislate as Washington stalls

2 min read
16:45UTC

California advanced three AI-employment bills through committee in late June, including the 'No Robo Bosses Act', though none has reached a floor vote.

← Back to AI closes the hiring door, not the exitJump to analysis ↓
EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

AI job protections advance only at state level, reaching only workers in states that pass them.

California moved three AI-employment bills through committee in the final days of June. AB 2545, which would make the state's Employment Development Department build an AI worker-impact dataset, cleared Senate Appropriations 9 to 0 on 29 June. SB 947, the 'No Robo Bosses Act', which would curb AI-only hiring and firing decisions, reached the Assembly Judiciary Committee on 25 June. SB 951, a 90-day technological-displacement notice bill, had an Assembly Privacy Committee hearing on 1 July, but none of the three has yet reached a floor vote. 1

State legislatures keep advancing AI-employment law while the main federal bill has not moved. The only AI job protections gaining ground in the US now sit at state level, reaching only workers who live in those states. California cleared AB 2656 through Senate Labor 5 to 0 in mid-June and moved SB 951 through the Senate 28 to 9 earlier ; New York passed its own hiring-impact bill through both chambers the same month .

Deep Analysis

In plain English

While the US Congress has not passed any national law on AI and jobs, individual states are moving ahead on their own. California is furthest along, with three different bills inching through committee in late June, though none has had a full vote yet. AB 2545 would make a state agency start collecting real data on how AI affects hiring and firing, something the federal government currently does not do. SB 947, nicknamed the 'No Robo Bosses Act', would limit AI making hiring and firing decisions without human involvement. SB 951 would require 90 days' notice before a big AI-driven layoff, longer than the 60 days federal law requires.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

AB 2545's requirement that the Employment Development Department build an AI worker-impact dataset exists specifically because the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics has never published a comparable series; California is legislating the exact measurement instrument Washington has left absent for three years running, with only the New York Fed's contradictory job-posting study filling the federal gap so far.

None of the three bills has reached a floor vote because each sits in a different chamber's committee structure, Senate Appropriations for AB 2545, Assembly Judiciary for SB 947, Assembly Privacy for SB 951, so their progress depends on three separate committee calendars converging before the legislative session closes, not on a single shared blocker.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    California is moving to collect the AI workforce-impact data that no federal agency currently publishes, positioning state administrative data as a possible substitute benchmark for Stanford's contested JOLTS-based estimate (ID:3584).

  • Risk

    With Congress producing no comparable federal vehicle, California's bills risk becoming a patchwork standard that only applies to workers in one state, while national employers structure AI deployment to concentrate the affected roles elsewhere.

Sources:Stanford Digital Economy Lab
Mentions:California →AB 2545 →SB 947 →SB 951 →Bureau of Labor Statistics →AB 2656 →US Congress →Washington →New York State →California State Legislature →
First Reported In

Update #15 · Oracle names AI in its own annual report

Stanford Digital Economy Lab· 1 Jul 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
This Event
US states legislate as Washington stalls
State legislatures are the only US venue where AI job protections are gaining ground, and they reach only workers who live in those states.
Led to
California eyes 45-day AI notice rule
Committee action on AB 2545, SB 947 and SB 951 continues California's AI-employment legislative push alongside AB 2656.
Occurred 17 Jun 2026
Read story →
California bill sets 90-day AI layoff notice
SB 951's committee progress continues its path after clearing the Senate 28-9.
Occurred 6 Jun 2026
Read story →
States write the AI law Congress won't
Late-June committee action extends the California bill slate's progress reported alongside New York's A9581 passage.
Occurred 10 Jun 2026
Read story →
California binds AI hiring, EU defers
The three bills continue the committee march this beat logged in late June.
Occurred 1 Jul 2026
Read story →
Different Perspectives
Salesforce, Synopsys and TD Bank Group
Salesforce, Synopsys and TD Bank Group
Salesforce, Synopsys and TD Bank Group each filed quarterly disclosures in late August booking restructuring charges, or none at all, without naming AI as a cause. Their silence matters because Challenger's tracker shows AI as a stated reason fell to fourth place in August even as the year-to-date AI-cut total still leads at 116,175.
Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Indonesia
Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Indonesia
Singapore launched its Skills and Workforce Development Agency on 16 September, giving citizens six months of free premium AI tools, while South Korea ring-fenced its AI tax windfall in a new Future Response Fund. Taiwan kept funding its AI build past NT$190bn and Indonesia rewired vocational training around AI literacy, betting state-built skills beat a market-led adjustment.
ver.di, CGT Fonction Publique and CCOO
ver.di, CGT Fonction Publique and CCOO
Germany's ver.di banked a 3.3% pay rise on 1 September and opened talks on a Tarifvertrag Transformation covering dismissal bans and reskilling, while France's CGT rejected Paris's AI negotiating timetable the same week. Spain's CCOO went further on 21 September, proposing to tax companies by the jobs they generate rather than wait for the next bargaining round.
BIS General Manager and Federal Reserve governors
BIS General Manager and Federal Reserve governors
The BIS's General Manager said on 10 September that AI displacement remains limited, even as the BIS's own survey found nearly 80% of firms plan to automate roles. Two Federal Reserve governors made the same point in July, arguing the labour-market data does not yet show a mass-firing event.
Bank of Canada, ONS and ECB
Bank of Canada, ONS and ECB
The Bank of Canada found the job-finding gap between AI-exposed and unexposed occupations widened from 2.2 to 13.9 percentage points since 2015-19, while separations barely moved. That framing, a hiring freeze rather than a firing wave, is echoed by the ECB's finding that euro-area AI use hit 52% of workers in 2026, concentrated among the university-educated.
Office for National Statistics
Office for National Statistics
Deferred its Transformed Labour Force Survey beyond November 2027 and disclosed a May 2026 telephone-collection failure. The ONS carries no AI-attribution layer at all, so Britain sits outside this month's cohort of measuring states by its own admission.