Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
AI: Jobs, Power & Money
27JUL

Directors open AI talks with the studios

2 min read
10:02UTC

The Directors Guild opened AMPTP contract talks on 12 May with AI training-use protection central, the next test of whether a Hollywood union can beat the limited terms the writers and actors settled for.

← Back to SAP freezes R&D headcount as others deny AIJump to analysis ↓
EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

Two prior union settlements won AI guardrails but no payment; the directors test whether that ceiling holds.

The Directors Guild of America (DGA), the union representing film and television directors and their Teams, opened formal negotiations with the AMPTP (the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, the studios' bargaining body) on 12 May 2026, with protection against AI training use of directors' creative work as a central demand. 1 The current contract expires on 30 June. DGA President Christopher Nolan told the studios they "are going to have to raise their contributions" to the health plan, putting healthcare alongside AI at the top of the table. 2

The DGA enters with a precedent it would rather beat than match. SAG-AFTRA, the actors' union, reached a four-year AMPTP deal that won digital-replica consent but no synthetic-performer royalty, the so-called Tilly tax , and the writers settled earlier on limited AI training protections with no payment for AI use of their work. Both unions secured guardrails without securing a price. The question for the directors is whether a third union at the table can convert consent rights into a revenue share, or whether the studios' two prior settlements have set the ceiling. Behind them sit the craft unions, IATSE among them, watching the result as the model for their own talks.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The Directors Guild of America, known as the DGA, is the union representing film and television directors in the United States. It has about 19,000 members. Every few years, the DGA negotiates a new contract with the AMPTP, which stands for Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers and represents the major film studios and streaming platforms like Netflix, Disney and Amazon. The central issue in 2026 is whether studios can use a director's creative work to train AI systems. When an AI learns to generate film scenes by studying thousands of existing films, the directors who made those films receive nothing. The DGA wants the contract to restrict this, or require payment. SAG-AFTRA, the actors' and performers' union, just settled its own four-year AMPTP deal in May 2026. It just reached a four-year deal with AMPTP in May 2026. The actors won the right to approve any use of their digital likeness (an AI copy of their face and voice), but did not win the Tilly tax. The Tilly tax was a proposed fee studios would pay every time an AI-generated character replaced a real actor. The studios rejected it. The Writers Guild of America (WGA) settled earlier in 2026 on similar terms: studios must notify writers when licensing their work for AI training, but do not have to pay for it. Christopher Nolan, the British filmmaker known for Oppenheimer and Inception, became DGA President and is leading these negotiations. His public position is that studios must also raise their contributions to the DGA health fund, which covers medical costs for members.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The DGA's weaker negotiating position relative to SAG-AFTRA traces to a structural difference in AI exposure between directors and performers. A synthetic performer (an AI copy of an actor's face and voice) is a direct, commercially scalable substitute for the original in advertising, streaming content and interactive media.

A synthetic director is not yet commercially deployable at scale: the creative-decision layer in film direction is more diffuse, harder to capture as a data artefact, and the market for AI-generated direction does not yet exist in the way that synthetic performers do.

This means the studios face less immediate cost-reduction pressure to reach a DGA AI deal than they did with SAG-AFTRA's Tilly tax demand. The DGA's leverage depends on whether its healthcare and pay demands give the AMPTP more reason to settle fast than to let the DGA contract expire on 30 June. Nolan's healthcare framing is a negotiating signal that the DGA is content to fight the economic battle even if the AI-protection battle is harder to win at this cycle.

What could happen next?
  • Precedent

    If the DGA accepts fund contributions over per-use training royalties, as SAG-AFTRA and WGA did in 2026, the three-union settlement pattern establishes that no major Hollywood union has won payment for AI training use of members' work in 2026 contracts.

  • Risk

    IATSE, the below-the-line crew union, is watching DGA terms as its own AI-protection model; a weak DGA settlement forecloses the strongest precedent IATSE could use in its own upcoming negotiations.

Sources:Boston.com
Mentions:Directors Guild of America →AMPTP →SAG-AFTRA →Writers Guild of America →IATSE →Ronald Reagan →Netflix →Amazon →United States →
First Reported In

Update #10 · Rival studies split on AI's hit to jobs

Boston.com· 24 May 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
Caused by
SAG-AFTRA wins consent rights, loses the Tilly tax
SAG-AFTRA's four-year settlement with limited AI protections sets the precedent the DGA is negotiating against, making the DGA the next test of whether unions can win stronger terms.
Occurred 2 May 2026
Read story →
This Event
Directors open AI talks with the studios
The DGA is the next test of whether a creative-sector union can win stronger AI terms than the deals before it.
Led to
Directors settle Hollywood's AI fight weakest
DGA opened AMPTP contract talks on 12 May with AI protections billed as central, and closed with a deal 29 days later.
Occurred 9 Jun 2026
Read story →
Different Perspectives
European Commission
European Commission
The European Commission's draft Annex III guidelines, closed for comment on 23 July, treat algorithmic scoring in recruitment, pay and termination as high-risk regardless of whether a human signs off, echoing Spain's Audiencia Nacional ruling 101/2026 on concealed scheduling algorithms. Brussels is shifting the fight from counting AI job losses to assigning legal liability for the tools themselves.
Office for National Statistics
Office for National Statistics
The Office for National Statistics recorded UK vacancies rising to 712,000 on 21 July, the first quarterly increase this beat has tracked, with payrolled employment down 85,000 on the year against May's 210,000 fall. The bulletin names no AI cause anywhere, and that is the point: nothing in the release confirms the displacement story it gets cited to support.
Christian Klein, SAP
Christian Klein, SAP
Christian Klein told investors on 23 July that SAP's research headcount will not grow for twelve months because AI agents and their token costs are absorbing the work, not because SAP is cutting jobs. He frames it as commercial arithmetic: the cost of AI-assisted coding tokens plus the salaries specialist AI hires command, not people being replaced by machines.
Betsey Stevenson, University of Michigan
Betsey Stevenson, University of Michigan
Betsey Stevenson argued that the 187,000 jobless-claims reading describes a market that hires little and fires little, not one AI is emptying. She said the real damage hides in eligibility rules and suppressed job postings, not in the headline layoff counts employers keep denying.
Comisiones Obreras, UGT and Concentrix's A Coruña works committee
Comisiones Obreras, UGT and Concentrix's A Coruña works committee
Comisiones Obreras, UGT and Concentrix's A Coruña works committee blamed Microsoft's push toward AI self-service for the 80 redundancies unions signed off on 22 July, not unavoidable business cause. A second Coruña procedure covering 80 more jobs runs to a 31 August deadline, and the unions want the state, not the employer, setting the pace of AI-driven cuts.
Stanford's 'We Must Act Now' signatories
Stanford's 'We Must Act Now' signatories
More than 200 academics, including 16 Nobel laureates, published a 13 July letter warning of AI-driven labour disruption, citing Daron Acemoglu's NBER estimate that AI's total factor productivity gain stays under 0.66% over ten years. The letter's own cited economics sit well below Goldman Sachs Research's 1.5-percentage-point estimate published the same week.