Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
AI: Jobs, Power & Money
8JUN

US states legislate as Washington stalls

2 min read
11:04UTC

California advanced three AI-employment bills through committee in late June, including the 'No Robo Bosses Act', though none has reached a floor vote.

← Back to Jobs report says fine, layoff report says noJump to analysis ↓
EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

AI job protections advance only at state level, reaching only workers in states that pass them.

California moved three AI-employment bills through committee in the final days of June. AB 2545, which would make the state's Employment Development Department build an AI worker-impact dataset, cleared Senate Appropriations 9 to 0 on 29 June. SB 947, the 'No Robo Bosses Act', which would curb AI-only hiring and firing decisions, reached the Assembly Judiciary Committee on 25 June. SB 951, a 90-day technological-displacement notice bill, had an Assembly Privacy Committee hearing on 1 July, but none of the three has yet reached a floor vote. 1

State legislatures keep advancing AI-employment law while the main federal bill has not moved. The only AI job protections gaining ground in the US now sit at state level, reaching only workers who live in those states. California cleared AB 2656 through Senate Labor 5 to 0 in mid-June and moved SB 951 through the Senate 28 to 9 earlier ; New York passed its own hiring-impact bill through both chambers the same month .

Deep Analysis

In plain English

While the US Congress has not passed any national law on AI and jobs, individual states are moving ahead on their own. California is furthest along, with three different bills inching through committee in late June, though none has had a full vote yet. AB 2545 would make a state agency start collecting real data on how AI affects hiring and firing, something the federal government currently does not do. SB 947, nicknamed the 'No Robo Bosses Act', would limit AI making hiring and firing decisions without human involvement. SB 951 would require 90 days' notice before a big AI-driven layoff, longer than the 60 days federal law requires.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

AB 2545's requirement that the Employment Development Department build an AI worker-impact dataset exists specifically because the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics has never published a comparable series; California is legislating the exact measurement instrument Washington has left absent for three years running, with only the New York Fed's contradictory job-posting study filling the federal gap so far.

None of the three bills has reached a floor vote because each sits in a different chamber's committee structure, Senate Appropriations for AB 2545, Assembly Judiciary for SB 947, Assembly Privacy for SB 951, so their progress depends on three separate committee calendars converging before the legislative session closes, not on a single shared blocker.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    California is moving to collect the AI workforce-impact data that no federal agency currently publishes, positioning state administrative data as a possible substitute benchmark for Stanford's contested JOLTS-based estimate (ID:3584).

  • Risk

    With Congress producing no comparable federal vehicle, California's bills risk becoming a patchwork standard that only applies to workers in one state, while national employers structure AI deployment to concentrate the affected roles elsewhere.

Sources:Stanford Digital Economy Lab
Mentions:California →AB 2545 →SB 947 →SB 951 →Bureau of Labor Statistics →AB 2656 →US Congress →Washington →New York State →California State Legislature →
First Reported In

Update #15 · Oracle names AI in its own annual report

Stanford Digital Economy Lab· 1 Jul 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
This Event
US states legislate as Washington stalls
State legislatures are the only US venue where AI job protections are gaining ground, and they reach only workers who live in those states.
Led to
California eyes 45-day AI notice rule
Committee action on AB 2545, SB 947 and SB 951 continues California's AI-employment legislative push alongside AB 2656.
Occurred 17 Jun 2026
Read story →
California bill sets 90-day AI layoff notice
SB 951's committee progress continues its path after clearing the Senate 28-9.
Occurred 6 Jun 2026
Read story →
States write the AI law Congress won't
Late-June committee action extends the California bill slate's progress reported alongside New York's A9581 passage.
Occurred 10 Jun 2026
Read story →
California binds AI hiring, EU defers
The three bills continue the committee march this beat logged in late June.
Occurred 1 Jul 2026
Read story →
Different Perspectives
Office for National Statistics
Office for National Statistics
Deferred its Transformed Labour Force Survey beyond November 2027 and disclosed a May 2026 telephone-collection failure. The ONS carries no AI-attribution layer at all, so Britain sits outside this month's cohort of measuring states by its own admission.
Uber India, Swiggy, Zomato and Urban Company
Uber India, Swiggy, Zomato and Urban Company
Named as respondents after the Karnataka High Court extended the interim welfare-fee deposit arrangement under the state's gig-worker welfare law to Uber India on 28 July, joining the other platforms already under the same order. The companies are contesting the underlying law while complying with the interim deposit terms.
Kenya State Department for ICT and the Digital Economy
Kenya State Department for ICT and the Digital Economy
Its draft AI policy, open for consultation to 4 August, proposes a pay floor for data-annotation work, where Kenyan annotators earn $1.46 to $3.74 an hour against $21 to $27 in the US, on figures relayed by the trade outlet WeeTracker. Kenya is legislating on AI labour even though the World Bank rates it among the least exposed economies.
ARAN and Italian public-sector unions
ARAN and Italian public-sector unions
Signed the CCNL Funzioni Centrali 2025-2027 on 6 August, the first Italian national contract with a dedicated AI Title, barring fully automated employment decisions without meaningful human intervention and requiring advance union notice of AI deployment. The unions secured this through bargaining rather than waiting for legislation.
US employers reporting to Challenger, Gray & Christmas
US employers reporting to Challenger, Gray & Christmas
Named artificial intelligence as the leading stated cause of job cuts for a fifth consecutive month in July, at 33% of that month's total, even as the overall cut count fell 27%. Employers kept citing AI as the reason even as scrutiny of the attribution rose.
Bank for International Settlements
Bank for International Settlements
Bulletin 130 reports a 0.75 percentage point average unemployment rise across high-AIPI countries between 2023 and 2025, while its own footnote 2 states the index is strongly correlated with employment shares in AI-exposed sectors it is used to predict. The bulletin calls the productivity payoff uncertain and uneven.