Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
2026 FIFA World Cup
25JUL

Iran moves camp to Tijuana, demands visas

3 min read
11:57UTC

FIFA approved Iran's switch of base camp from Tucson to Tijuana on Tuesday 26 May; hours later federation president Mehdi Taj demanded multiple-entry US visas for a squad that must now cross the border for every match.

SportDeveloping
Key takeaway

FIFA gave Iran the camp; the border crossing it now requires is Washington's to grant.

FIFA approved Iran's request to move its World Cup base camp from the Kino Sports Complex in Tucson, Arizona, to Tijuana, Mexico, confirmed on Tuesday 26 May on FIFA's official 48-camp list 1 2. The Tucson facility had been cited across five prior updates as the operational proof Iran meant to play, a working base no political row had displaced . The move to Mexico reverses that narrative: the camp that signalled commitment has been relocated to the wrong side of the border.

Tijuana resolves one problem and creates another. Iran's three group matches fall in Los Angeles on Monday 15 June and Sunday 21 June and in Seattle on Friday 26 June, so a squad based in Mexico must cross into the United States and back three times. Mehdi Taj, president of the FFIRI (Iran's football federation, distinct from its sports ministry), framed Tijuana as removing the friction of preparing on US soil, since the team can fly into Mexico, while in the same breath demanding multiple-entry US visas, because single-entry papers would strand the squad after the first crossing 3. He had already named the players this turns on in a 10-point ultimatum .

Those players are striker Mehdi Taremi and defender Ehsan Hajsafi, whose past military service places them inside the carve-out Secretary of State Marco Rubio set in April, barring entry to staff linked to the IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Iran's elite military branch) . They applied at the US embassy in Ankara on Thursday 21 May, but the State Department has issued no adjudication. FIFA recognises federations, not governments, so the camp move is a logistics decision it can make alone; the visa is the single piece it cannot sign for. Trump endorsed Iran's participation in April , yet no instrument has followed his words, and the operational fact has settled the question again while the political track stays silent.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran is one of 48 nations at this World Cup, and their matches are in the United States. The two countries have had no normal diplomatic relations since 1980, and in recent years the US has placed travel restrictions on many Iranians. Some Iranian players, including Mehdi Taremi and Ehsan Hajsafi, served in Iran's military as the law requires. Part of that military is the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or IRGC, which the US has designated a terrorist organisation. That designation means US law may block visas for these specific players. FIFA's solution was to let Iran base itself in Tijuana, just across the Mexican border. The squad can practise in Mexico and cross into the US on match days. But they still need US entry permission each time they cross, and that permission has not been formally granted yet.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Trump's travel ban, expanded in December 2025 to cover Iran, created a blanket restriction that the standard FIFA host-nation agreement cannot override without specific executive action.

Iran's mandatory conscription means most adult men have served in the armed forces, and a meaningful share served in IRGC units. The Rubio guidance defines an IRGC-linked category broad enough to reach well beyond Taremi and Hajsafi, which is why two named players have become the test of the whole squad's access.

The Tijuana solution works because Mexico stands outside the US-Iran quarrel and offers a functioning training base close to the US border venues Iran must reach, turning a diplomatic dead end into a manageable commute.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    A last-minute visa denial for Taremi or Hajsafi would force Iran onto the pitch without two of their most experienced players, with fewer than two weeks until their opener.

    Immediate · Suggested
  • Precedent

    The Tijuana base-camp arrangement creates a template for future World Cups hosted by nations in political dispute with qualifying teams: a logistics workaround that circumvents the formal visa problem without addressing its legal basis.

    Long term · Assessed
  • Risk

    Daily border crossings on match days carry disruption risk from any US security incident, elevated alert, or administrative delay that could affect Iran's pre-match preparation.

    Immediate · Suggested
First Reported In

Update #12 · Squads land, subpoenas follow

Al Jazeera· 29 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Real Madrid
Real Madrid
Operating internally on the basis Rodri joins, according to David Ornstein's reporting, despite no talks having taken place with Manchester City. The gap between internal planning and actual negotiation is itself notable.
Manchester City
Manchester City
Unwilling to sell Rodri, with manager Enzo Maresca stating he returns to the club after back surgery. No club-to-club talks with Real Madrid are taking place, contradicting the framing of a deal in motion.
CONMEBOL
CONMEBOL
Backs the move to a 64-team 2030 tournament co-hosted across South America. Has not engaged publicly with FIFPRO's workload or heat-threshold objections drawn from this tournament's data.
FIFA
FIFA
Points to its 30 June technical and officiating reviews as the authoritative account of the tournament's football, including Collina's rejection of bias claims. Has not publicly responded to the renewed compensation call or disputed FIFPRO's heat-threshold figures.
FIFPRO
FIFPRO
Measures a four-degree gap between its own 28C postponement threshold and FIFA's 32C cooling-break trigger, breached in 19% of matches played. Cites a 70-83 match workload projection to oppose the 64-team 2030 format.
Human Rights Watch
Human Rights Watch
Documents 54 immigration-custody deaths before kickoff and two since, and revives the compensation duty FIFA's own advisers identified after Qatar 2022 and never acted on. Treats the pattern as unresolved FIFA liability, not a closed file.