
University of Oxford Institute for Energy Studies
Independent Oxford energy research centre producing authoritative LNG and gas market analysis for governments and traders.
Last refreshed: 3 July 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic
Will EU gas storage actually hit 70% by November or fall further short?
Timeline for University of Oxford Institute for Energy Studies
Projected a 69-70% November storage landing against the 80% floor
European Energy Markets: EU storage tops 50%, still behind 2025Hormuz stand-down has not reopened the strait
European Energy MarketsPublished a June Comment charting EU storage to 74.3 bcm by November on a mid-year Hormuz reopening assumption now invalidated
European Energy Markets: OIES base case becomes its stress caseStorage hits 47.4% as heat burns gas
European Energy MarketsMentioned in: JKM-TTF arb collapses as tankers return
European Energy MarketsWhat is the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies?
What did OIES say about LNG supply in 2026?
How does OIES differ from the IEA on energy analysis?
Background
The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (OIES) is an independent research centre affiliated with the University of Oxford, founded in 1982. It publishes the Quarterly Gas Review, Oxford Energy Comment, and Oxford Energy Forum series, cited by the IEA, European Commission, and commodity traders worldwide. It is politically independent, funded by a membership network of energy companies, governments, and financial institutions, and is not a government body. Its research fellows include specialist economists and energy policy analysts whose work informs national injection planning, contract pricing, and regulatory responses to supply shocks.
OIES's April 2026 Quarterly Gas Review Issue 32 quantified the Q1 global LNG supply cut at approximately 20% and calculated the EU needs 6 bcm more than its Summer 2025 injection for adequate winter storage. Oxford Energy Forum Issue 148 (April 2026) framed the Iran shock as the most disruptive energy episode since the 1970s, with papers projecting multi-year rather than transitional disruption. OIES's June 2026 Comment (Fulwood, Honore, Sharples) revised the outlook further: the central case is EU storage reaching only 70% by 1 November against the mandated 80%, based on a 2.1 bcm per month net European LNG shortfall through October. The Comment shows TTF forwards averaging USD 14.72/MMBtu for 2026, well below the USD 20/MMBtu the authors warn may be needed to choke sufficient demand if Hormuz remains closed. OIES's independent corroboration of IEA data narrows the uncertainty band on supply assumptions that policymakers use for injection planning.
The 26-29 June Hormuz escalation and verbal US-Iran stand-down invalidated OIES's clean-reopening base case: its own closed-through-October stress scenario now reads as the more likely autumn trajectory. Four days after the stand-down, IMF PortWatch counted only 27-43 daily Hormuz transits against an 84 pre-crisis baseline, and QatarEnergy ran at roughly 35% of its 77 MTPA nameplate, short of its guided 50%-within-a-month pace. Lloyd's List traced the shortfall to strait logistics, not diplomacy: escort convoys clear only three to four tankers a day on seven to eight warships, a ratio that cannot scale without more vessels in the corridor, capping how fast OIES's own refill forecasts can converge with a reopened corridor.