
Resolve to Save Lives
Global health NGO founded by ex-CDC Director Tom Frieden; champions the 7-1-7 outbreak response metric, adopted by WHO.
Last refreshed: 25 June 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic
The CDC's own model says isolation must hit 70% to stop DRC Ebola; why is 7-1-7 not moving that needle?
Timeline for Resolve to Save Lives
Mentioned in: US renews 30-day Ebola entry ban
Pandemics and BiosecurityMentioned in: Isolation rate sits below the line
Pandemics and BiosecurityMentioned in: MERS kills a third, two new Gulf cases
Pandemics and BiosecurityMentioned in: Burned clinic rebuilt as access fails
Pandemics and BiosecurityMentioned in: IHR committee meets, rejects travel bans
Pandemics and BiosecurityWhat is the 7-1-7 outbreak response standard?
Who founded Resolve to Save Lives?
What is the 7-1-7 framework and where did it come from?
Background
Resolve to Save Lives is a global public health NGO founded in 2017 by Tom Frieden, former Director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama. The organisation is housed within Vital Strategies and funded primarily by Bloomberg Philanthropies and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative. It runs two principal programme areas: a cardiovascular disease prevention programme targeting sodium, hypertension, and trans fats; and an epidemic prevention programme that developed the 7-1-7 framework, a detection-notification-response standard now adopted by WHO as a core preparedness benchmark. The 7-1-7 metric requires that an outbreak be detected within 7 days of emergence, notified to authorities within 1 day of detection, and responded to within 7 days of notification.
Resolve and Frieden have been consistently critical of US outbreak surveillance decisions in 2026. The organisation argues that the DRC Bundibugyo Ebola outbreak is a direct test of the 7-1-7 benchmark: the CDC's own modelling (R0 = 2.51) puts the outbreak on a PATH to 20,000 cases by August 2026 if patient isolation stays below 20%, but the isolation rate as of 14 June was only 45.9%, still short of the 70% collapse threshold. The US response has oscillated between a 30-day entry ban on nationals of DRC, Uganda, and South Sudan, which expired unresolved around 17 June and was renewed on 21 June, three days after a France importation case that the ban could not have stopped as it applied only to those nationals, not French citizens. Frieden's public health perspective frames travel bans as a distraction from the foundational 7-1-7 response work: contact tracing, isolation, and healthcare worker protection.