Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Resolve to Save Lives
OrganisationUS

Resolve to Save Lives

Global health NGO founded by ex-CDC Director Tom Frieden; champions the 7-1-7 outbreak response metric, adopted by WHO.

Last refreshed: 25 June 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

The CDC's own model says isolation must hit 70% to stop DRC Ebola; why is 7-1-7 not moving that needle?

Timeline for Resolve to Save Lives

View full timeline →
Common Questions
What is the 7-1-7 outbreak response standard?
The 7-1-7 standard requires that an outbreak be detected within 7 days of emergence, reported to authorities within 1 day of detection, and a full public health response launched within 7 days of notification. Developed by Resolve to Save Lives, it is now a WHO preparedness benchmark.Source: Resolve to Save Lives
Who founded Resolve to Save Lives?
Tom Frieden, former Director of the US CDC under Presidents Bush and Obama, founded Resolve to Save Lives in 2017. It is housed within Vital Strategies and funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.
What is the 7-1-7 framework and where did it come from?
The 7-1-7 framework is an outbreak response standard requiring detection within 7 days, notification within 1 day, and response initiation within 7 days. It was developed by Resolve to Save Lives, the NGO founded by former CDC Director Tom Frieden, and has been adopted by WHO as a core preparedness benchmark.

Background

Resolve to Save Lives is a global public health NGO founded in 2017 by Tom Frieden, former Director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama. The organisation is housed within Vital Strategies and funded primarily by Bloomberg Philanthropies and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative. It runs two principal programme areas: a cardiovascular disease prevention programme targeting sodium, hypertension, and trans fats; and an epidemic prevention programme that developed the 7-1-7 framework, a detection-notification-response standard now adopted by WHO as a core preparedness benchmark. The 7-1-7 metric requires that an outbreak be detected within 7 days of emergence, notified to authorities within 1 day of detection, and responded to within 7 days of notification.

Resolve and Frieden have been consistently critical of US outbreak surveillance decisions in 2026. The organisation argues that the DRC Bundibugyo Ebola outbreak is a direct test of the 7-1-7 benchmark: the CDC's own modelling (R0 = 2.51) puts the outbreak on a PATH to 20,000 cases by August 2026 if patient isolation stays below 20%, but the isolation rate as of 14 June was only 45.9%, still short of the 70% collapse threshold. The US response has oscillated between a 30-day entry ban on nationals of DRC, Uganda, and South Sudan, which expired unresolved around 17 June and was renewed on 21 June, three days after a France importation case that the ban could not have stopped as it applied only to those nationals, not French citizens. Frieden's public health perspective frames travel bans as a distraction from the foundational 7-1-7 response work: contact tracing, isolation, and healthcare worker protection.

More questions
What does Resolve to Save Lives do?
Resolve to Save Lives runs two programmes: a cardiovascular disease prevention programme targeting sodium, hypertension, and trans fats; and an epidemic prevention programme that built and champions the 7-1-7 outbreak response framework across lower-income country partnerships.
Why is the DRC Ebola isolation rate important in 2026?
The CDC's R0 model for the DRC Bundibugyo outbreak (published June 2026) found that at 20% isolation rate, 65% of simulation runs reach 20,000 cases by August. The isolation rate was 45.9% on 14 June, still well below the 70% threshold the model identifies as necessary to collapse worst-case trajectories.Source: CDC MMWR
Does the US Ebola entry ban stop the spread of the DRC outbreak?
The 30-day entry ban on nationals of DRC, Uganda, and South Sudan renewed on 21 June 2026 would not have stopped a France importation case three days earlier, which involved a French citizen not subject to the ban. Critics including former CDC Director Tom Frieden argue travel bans distract from the foundational 7-1-7 response work.Source: CDC
Source Material