
Mayer Brown
Global law firm; published legal analysis on FERC's RM26-4-000 large-load interconnection proceeding.
Last refreshed: 6 May 2026 · Appears in 2 active topics
Which legal questions could unravel FERC's June grid order in court?
Timeline for Mayer Brown
Mentioned in: Sanctions vice tightens on Russian crude
European Oil MarketsMentioned in: FERC delays its grid rule to 2027
Data Centres: Boom and BacklashMentioned in: PJM faces Monday FERC tariff deadline
Data Centres: Boom and BacklashProvided legal analysis identifying three contested questions in the docket
Data Centres: Boom and Backlash: FERC commits to June 2026 grid-load orderWhat did Mayer Brown say about FERC's large-load rulemaking?
Is FERC's June 2026 grid order legally durable?
What law firm is advising on FERC's large-load grid rulemaking?
Background
Mayer Brown published legal analysis of FERC's RM26-4-000 rulemaking that identified the key contested questions operators, utilities, and RTOs will face in the June 2026 order. The analysis noted that FERC moved roughly two months past the Department of Energy's preferred 30 April 2026 Deadline, and laid out the three fault lines in the proceeding: whether hyperscalers can bypass standard interconnection studies; how behind-the-meter generation is treated for grid-exit cost allocation; and who bears the cost of transmission upgrades that large loads trigger.
Mayer Brown is a global law firm founded in 1881 and headquartered in Chicago, with major offices in Washington, DC, London, Frankfurt, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Its energy and infrastructure regulatory practice is one of the most active in Washington, representing utilities, generators, and large consumers in FERC proceedings. The firm's energy group regularly files interventions and comments in FERC dockets and publishes client alerts that are widely cited in the energy and data-centre industries.
For the data-centre sector specifically, Mayer Brown's analysis of RM26-4-000 is significant because it maps the legal durability risk of the June order. FERC explicitly said it sought a ruling that was "quick, efficient, and legally durable" — language that acknowledges prior interconnection reform attempts have been challenged in the courts. Mayer Brown's work helps operators assess the risk of the order being vacated or remanded on judicial review.