Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
DJI
OrganisationCN

DJI

Chinese drone maker; barred from US federal procurement and fighting $1.56B Ninth Circuit case.

Last refreshed: 21 May 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

Can DJI's $1.56B Ninth Circuit case reverse the FCC ban before it kills the European market too?

Timeline for DJI

#919 May
#722 Apr

Filed Opposition Brief in Ninth Circuit Case 26-1029 quantifying $1.56B in 2026 losses

Drones: Industry & Defence: DJI puts $1.56bn on Ninth Circuit record
View full timeline →
Common Questions
Why did the Pentagon file a secret brief against DJI?
The Pentagon filed a classified brief on 3 April 2026 arguing national security grounds for keeping DJI on the FCC Covered List; the sealed arguments cannot be publicly contested by DJI.Source: DroneXL
Is DJI banned in the United States?
DJI is banned from federal procurement contracts and cannot receive new FCC certifications for its products; existing consumer models remain legal to purchase and operate privately.
Can I still buy a DJI drone in 2026?
Existing DJI drones remain legal to own and operate in the US. The restrictions block federal procurement and new product certifications, not consumer use of existing models.Source: background

Background

DJI (Da-Jiang Innovations) manufactures roughly 70% of the world's commercial drones from its headquarters in Shenzhen. Its Phantom, Mavic, and Matrice lines dominate consumer, prosumer, and enterprise markets across agriculture, infrastructure inspection, and filmmaking.

Washington has progressively squeezed DJI out of the US market through three interlocking mechanisms. The FCC added DJI to its Covered List in December 2025, blocking new product certifications . FAR clause 52.240-1, active from March 2026, converted that ban into a binding procurement rule requiring federal contractors to certify their supply chains contain no ASDA-covered components . On 3 April 2026, the Pentagon filed a classified brief against DJI, the third layer: sealed national security arguments that DJI cannot publicly contest .

On 22 April 2026 DJI filed its opposition brief in the Ninth Circuit (Case 26-1029), quantifying the regulatory impact at $1.56 billion: roughly $700 million in stalled authorisations for 14 existing products and $860 million from 25 new products it cannot launch in 2026 . The brief, signed by former FCC enforcement chief Travis LeBlanc and former US Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, invokes the Ralls Corp. v. CFIUS precedent to argue that national security review cannot rest on opaque, category-wide assumptions without access to the unclassified record. That same Ralls Corp. argument is now being advanced by Autel Robotics in its parallel FCC petition filed 19 May 2026, effectively creating a shared legal framework against the Covered List .

Despite the US restrictions, DJI holds 26 of 66 approved drone systems on the EASA list in Europe (39%). A Drone Security Package targeted for Q3 2026 and a proposed Remote ID threshold drop from 250g to 100g could tighten European market access further.

More questions
Will DJI be banned in Europe too?
DJI still holds 26 of 66 EASA-approved drone systems (39%); a planned EU Drone Security Package and Remote ID threshold changes due in Q3 2026 could restrict further market access, but no ban has been announced.
What is the alternative to DJI for military and government use?
Skydio (US-made, GPS-denied capable, Army SRR winner) is the primary US alternative. In April 2026 Skydio won its first overseas USAF contract for Middle East airbases, directly displacing DJI from a role Chinese-made drones previously filled.Source: event
How much money is DJI losing because of the FCC ban?
DJI's Ninth Circuit brief quantifies the impact at $1.56 billion in 2026: $700 million from stalled existing-product authorisations and $860 million from 25 new products it cannot launch.Source: DroneXL
What is the Ralls Corp argument DJI is using against the FCC?
DJI invokes Ralls Corp. v. CFIUS (2014), which held national security decisions cannot rest on opaque assumptions without giving companies access to the unclassified evidence record; DJI argues the same due-process right applies to its FCC Covered List designation.Source: DroneDJ