
Center for Journalism & Liberty
US press freedom and media policy research organisation affiliated with the Open Markets Institute.
Last refreshed: 10 May 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic
Has the AI publisher-licensing market resolved the structural asymmetry CJL mapped in April 2026?
Timeline for Center for Journalism & Liberty
Mentioned in: WBD ships agentic ads on its last upfront
Media's AI PivotPublished 'Same Gatekeepers, New Tollbooths' report quantifying publisher AI licensing deals
Media's AI Pivot: News Corp names $1.5bn Anthropic settlementMentioned in: Reach signs AWS pay-per-usage AI licensing deal
Media's AI PivotWhat is the Center for Journalism & Liberty?
What did the Center for Journalism & Liberty find about AI licensing deals?
Why does News Corp's Anthropic deal look so large compared to other AI publisher deals?
Background
The Center for Journalism & Liberty (CJL) is a US media policy organisation housed within the Open Markets Institute that in April 2026 published "Same Gatekeepers, New Tollbooths: Mapping the AI Content Licensing Market", the most comprehensive independent audit of AI publisher-licensing deal terms to date. The report mapped known deal values: News Corp's OpenAI arrangement at approximately $250 million over five years, DotDash Meredith at $16 million per year, Thomson Reuters at $33 million year-to-date in AI licensing revenue, and Amazon paying The New York Times roughly $20 million annually. These figures became the reference point against which News Corp's $1.5 billion anticipated Anthropic settlement was measured when Thomson disclosed the figure on 8 May 2026.
The Center for Journalism & Liberty was established to advocate for independent journalism and press freedom in the context of platform dominance. It has produced a series of reports examining how large technology platforms affect news publishers' business models, distribution reach and editorial independence. "Same Gatekeepers, New Tollbooths" argued that the AI content-licensing market was replicating the structural asymmetry of the prior search and social platform era, with AI companies acting as a new class of gatekeeper. The report's title is a reference to antitrust scholarship on platform choke-points.
CJL's significance in this briefing cycle is methodological: it assembled deal terms that publishers agreed under non-disclosure provisions, providing the first market-wide comparison of AI licensing values. The $1.5 billion Anthropic figure disclosed by News Corp sits six times above the OpenAI deal CJL had mapped — a ratio that will be cited in every subsequent policy discussion about whether AI licensing income can structurally offset the advertising revenue losses that are driving publisher consolidation.