Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
CCGT
Technology

CCGT

Power generation technology combining a gas turbine with a steam turbine to reach 55-62% efficiency.

Last refreshed: 1 June 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

Why did German CCGT plants stop injecting gas into storage in May 2026?

Timeline for CCGT

View full timeline →
Common Questions
How much does it cost to generate electricity from a gas power station in Europe now?
At TTF EUR 50/MWh and EUA EUR 65/t, a combined-cycle gas turbine's short-run marginal cost is approximately EUR 62-68/MWh in Germany, combining gas fuel and carbon allowance costs.Source: european-energy-markets briefing
What is a combined-cycle gas turbine and how is it different from a regular gas power station?
A CCGT runs a gas turbine and a secondary steam turbine in series, recovering exhaust heat to achieve 55-62% thermal efficiency — significantly higher than the 35-40% of a simple-cycle open-turbine plant.Source: IEA / energy encyclopaedia
Why does Germany need 12 GW of new gas power plants if it is expanding renewables?
New capacity is hydrogen-ready CCGT, designed to balance intermittent wind and solar. Germany confirmed a 12 GW hydrogen-ready gas tender with the EU Commission, with the first 8 GW auction set for September 2026.Source: european-energy-markets briefing
How does the EU carbon price affect CCGT electricity generation costs?
At EUA EUR 65/t and a CCGT emission factor of 0.52 t CO2/MWh, the carbon component alone adds approximately EUR 34/MWh to generation cost, roughly half the total short-run marginal cost.Source: EU ETS / EPEX SPOT data
How does a combined-cycle gas turbine produce electricity?
A CCGT burns natural gas in a gas turbine, then captures the hot exhaust in a heat-recovery steam generator to drive a second steam turbine. This two-stage process reaches 55-62% efficiency, well above a simple-cycle gas turbine at 35-40%.Source: IEA Gas Technology Report
Why did German gas plants stop injecting into storage in May 2026?
With TTF at EUR 47/MWh and EUA carbon at EUR 75/tonne, CCGT short-run marginal cost reached around EUR 129/MWh, above German day-ahead clearing of EUR 106.35, producing a negative clean spark spread. Running a gas plant to inject into storage destroys money at those relative prices.Source: event
What is the clean spark spread and why does it matter?
The clean spark spread is the margin a gas-fired power plant earns after paying for gas fuel and carbon allowances. When it turns negative — as in Germany in May 2026 — gas plants run off-merit and cannot cover operating costs, removing commercial gas demand from the market.Source: event
Can CCGTs be converted to burn hydrogen?
Yes. Germany's 12 GW hydrogen-ready capacity tender requires plant designs capable of co-firing or switching to hydrogen. The economics depend on green hydrogen reaching costs competitive with TTF-plus-carbon; at May 2026 prices that threshold has not been crossed.Source: German Federal Network Agency hydrogen-ready tender documentation

Background

In the European power markets briefing series, CCGT sits at the nexus of the gas-storage and carbon stories. At TTF EUR 47/MWh and EUA EUR 75/tonne (May 2026 levels), CCGT short-run marginal cost reaches approximately EUR 129/MWh, above German day-ahead clearing of EUR 106.35 — producing a negative clean spark spread and pushing German gas plant off-merit. This dynamic is the proximate reason commercial gas-injection economics broke in May 2026: running a CCGT to inject gas into storage destroys value at these relative prices, concentrating the storage burden on mandate-driven operators. The carbon component alone (EUR 34-39/MWh) is the share cited by German chemical and industrial consumers as central to the EUR 62-68/MWh power-cost floor driving curtailment decisions. Germany's planned 12 GW hydrogen-ready capacity is an attempt to preserve CCGT-style flexibility while building a route out of the EUA cost exposure.

A Combined-Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) plant generates electricity by running a gas turbine on natural gas combustion, then capturing the exhaust heat in a heat-recovery steam generator (HRSG) to drive a second steam turbine. This two-stage recovery lifts efficiency to 55-62% — significantly higher than the 35-40% of a simple-cycle open-frame gas turbine — and reduces fuel consumption and carbon emissions per MWh of output. CCGTs typically reach full output within 30-60 minutes, faster than coal or nuclear but slower than open-cycle gas turbines used for peak shaving. Their combination of efficiency, dispatchability, and moderate capital cost made them the dominant new-build thermal technology in European power systems through the 2000s and 2010s.

In electricity merit-order terms, CCGTs typically sit mid-stack: they operate more cheaply than older open-cycle gas plant or oil-fired capacity, but are undercut by nuclear, hydro, and renewables on marginal cost. On high-demand days with low wind and high industrial load, the last CCGT running is often the market price-setter — the 'marginal unit' whose short-run marginal cost clears the Day-ahead market. That cost has two principal components: the gas fuel input (indexed to TTF or NBP) and the carbon cost of emissions (priced via EU Allowances under the EU ETS at approximately 0.52 tonnes CO2/MWh for a modern CCGT). The clean spark spread — the margin after fuel and carbon — is the key profitability signal for CCGT operators.

Energy transition planning in Europe gives CCGTs a dual role: as the dispatchable backbone supporting intermittent renewables in the near term, and as a potential hydrogen-burning asset in the longer term once green hydrogen costs fall sufficiently. Germany's government approved a 12 GW hydrogen-ready gas capacity tender in 2024, explicitly specifying plant designs capable of co-firing or switching to hydrogen. The economics of that transition depend critically on whether hydrogen can undercut CCGT marginal cost at scale.

Source Material