Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Brennan Center for Justice
OrganisationUS

Brennan Center for Justice

NYU School of Law-affiliated non-partisan legal institute; research authority on voting rights, war powers, and democracy.

Last refreshed: 2 May 2026 · Appears in 2 active topics

Key Question

Can the Brennan Center's war powers analysis stop a president from declaring a war over unilaterally?

Timeline for Brennan Center for Justice

View full timeline →
Common Questions
Is the Brennan Center for Justice non-partisan?
The Brennan Center is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit affiliated with NYU Law. It describes itself as non-partisan; Republican critics argue its work on voting rights and criminal justice reflects a liberal orientation.
What does the Brennan Center say about the SAVE Act?
The Brennan Center estimates 21 million eligible US voters lack the documentary proof of citizenship the SAVE Act would require, disproportionately affecting lower-income, elderly, and minority citizens.Source: Brennan Center for Justice
What is the Brennan Center for Justice?
The Brennan Center for Justice is a non-partisan law and policy institute at NYU School of Law, founded in 1995. It focuses on voting rights, criminal justice, and national security, and is frequently cited in federal court cases on election law and executive power.
How many Americans would the SAVE Act disenfranchise according to the Brennan Center?
The Brennan Center estimates that 21 million eligible US voters do not hold the documentary proof of citizenship the SAVE Act would require to register to vote, disproportionately affecting low-income, elderly, and minority citizens.Source: https://www.brennancenter.org/
Who is Katherine Yon Ebright at the Brennan Center?
Katherine Yon Ebright is Senior Counsel in the Brennan Center's Liberty and National Security Programme. On 1 May 2026 she was the key cited authority on whether Trump's War Powers Resolution letter could pause the Section 1544(b) 60-day clock, concluding the statute permits no such pause.Source: Brennan Center for Justice
What does the Brennan Center say about war powers?
The Brennan Center's national security team has argued that the War Powers Resolution 60-day clock cannot be paused by presidential notification alone. Senior Counsel Katherine Yon Ebright's analysis of Trump's 1 May 2026 WPR letter held that Section 1544(b) runs until Congress acts or hostilities end — the president cannot unilaterally suspend it.Source: Brennan Center for Justice
Is the Brennan Center non-partisan?
The Brennan Center is a registered 501(c)(3) non-partisan institute, but Republican critics characterise it as a left-aligned advocacy organisation. Its voting rights research is routinely cited by Democratic litigants, while its election administration technical guidance is used by administrators across party lines.

Background

The Brennan Center for Justice is a non-partisan law and policy institute housed at NYU School of Law, named after Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan Jr. Founded in 1995, it covers elections, criminal justice reform, and national security. In election years it functions as a rapid-response research body, publishing real-time analysis of executive orders, court rulings, and legislative changes that affect voter access. Its work is cited by Democratic litigants and characterised by Republican critics as advocacy masquerading as research.

In the 2026 election cycle the Brennan Center is the principal research and advocacy body documenting the scope and impact of voting law changes. Its research underpins the argument that the SAVE Act would disenfranchise an estimated 21 million eligible US voters who lack the documentary proof of citizenship the bill would require. Its documentation of historical voting suppression patterns provides the evidentiary base for Voting Rights Act litigation, including cases arguing the Florida and Texas maps violate Section 2.

Senior Counsel Katherine Yon Ebright, of the Brennan Center's Liberty and National Security Programme, was the key cited authority on whether Trump's 1 May 2026 War Powers Resolution letter could pause the Section 1544(b) clock. Her analysis held that the statute supports no pause mechanism: once the 60-day period begins, it runs until Congress acts or hostilities end.