Asghar Bakeri
Reported commander of Quds Force Unit 840, Iran covert external operations branch, reportedly killed 6 April 2026.
Last refreshed: 7 April 2026
Who ran Iran covert operations against foreign targets, and is he dead?
Timeline for Asghar Bakeri
Quds Force 840 commander reported dead
Iran Conflict 2026Mentioned in: Khademi killed and the IRGC's gatekeeper falls
Iran Conflict 2026Who was Asghar Bakeri and why does his reported death matter?
What is Quds Force Unit 840?
Is Bakeri definitely dead or is it unconfirmed?
Background
Asghar Bakeri, named in regional reporting as the commander of Quds Force Unit 840, was reported killed in the 6 April 2026 Israeli strike wave on Asaluyeh alongside IRGC intelligence chief Maj. Gen. Majid Khademi . Wire-service confirmation is still pending; the sourcing is a single regional outlet (House of Saud desk), and the report should be read with that caveat. If confirmed, he is the most senior Quds Force external operations officer killed in the conflict to date.
Quds Force Unit 840 is the IRGC Quds Force branch charged with covert operations outside Iran borders: targeted killings, sabotage, and attacks on foreign officials run through deniable cutout networks rather than direct Iranian attribution. Western intelligence agencies have linked Unit 840 operations to multiple disrupted plots in Europe, the Gulf, and Central Asia over the past several years, and to the tandem-drone attempt on the US Embassy in Riyadh earlier in the current war . The unit reports through the Quds Force command structure to the broader IRGC military council that has exercised effective wartime control over Iran Foreign Policy since early March.
A confirmed Bakeri kill would compound the disruption caused by Khademi loss on the same day. The simultaneous removal of the IRGC internal surveillance chief and the head of its external assassinations branch is the most significant compound leadership attrition of the war to date. The operational consequence is asymmetric: Unit 840 compartmentalisation means the network can continue operating from surviving cells, but without central coordination, a surviving deputy may authorise an operation outside disciplined command oversight, raising the risk of an uncoordinated retaliation that is harder to de-escalate than a conventional missile exchange.