14JUN

Fellowship PAC Shows Zero in Federal Filings

2 min read

11:52UTC

Fellowship PAC still shows zero dollars in FEC filings despite claiming $100 million raised. The Q1 2026 disclosure is due 15 April, three days from today.

← Back to Florida locks the map; the rulebook locks next Jump to analysis ↓

PoliticsDeveloping

Key takeaway

The 15 April FEC filing will reveal whether Fellowship PAC's $100 million claim has any basis in federal records.

Fellowship PAC still shows $0 in FEC filings despite publicly claiming $100 million raised. The Q1 2026 quarterly report is due 15 April, three days from today. If that filing shows zero again, the claim remains entirely unsupported by federal records⁠¹.

The PAC is chaired by Jesse Spiro, a Tether US executive. Its registered finance director, Mitchell Nobel, works for Cantor Fitzgerald, which custodies Tether's reserves. The personnel connections to the stablecoin industry are direct.

Three explanations persist. The money does not exist, and the public claims function as influence projection without actual spending. The money exists but is structured below reporting thresholds or routed through intermediaries with their own delayed disclosure cycles. Or contributions were received after the previous filing period and will appear in the Q1 report. The 15 April filing will narrow these possibilities. Any reported contributions would reveal donor identity for the first time; continued silence would make the $100 million claim increasingly difficult to take at face value.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Fellowship PAC is a political action committee connected to the cryptocurrency industry, led by Jesse Spiro (an executive at Tether, a major crypto company) and Mitchell Nobel (an executive at Cantor Fitzgerald, a major Wall Street firm). It has publicly claimed to have raised $100 million to spend on the 2026 elections. The problem: federal election records show the PAC has received exactly $0 in contributions. This is not a small discrepancy , the entire publicly claimed amount is absent from official records. Political action committees are legally required to report contributions above $200 to the Federal Election Commission. If Fellowship PAC had actually received $100 million, those contributions would appear in public records. The Q1 2026 filing due in mid-April is the next opportunity for any contributions to appear. If it shows $0 again, the $100 million claim has no federal evidence to support it.

Source Landscape

This story draws on neutral-leaning sources

Consensus view: OpenSecrets research director Sarah Bryner assesses a second consecutive $0 quarterly filing for a PAC claiming $100M as operationally impossible under normal campaign finance mechanics , if contributions of that scale had been received, they would appear in FEC records within days of each large contribution. The $0 record strongly suggests the money has not actually been received by the PAC entity, making the $100M claim political inflation rather than financial fact.

Counter-view: The Cantor Fitzgerald and Tether connections suggest the PAC's financiers have sophisticated structuring capability; it is possible that contributions are flowing through intermediary 501(c)(4) organisations that are not required to disclose donors and which may transfer funds to the PAC on a delayed schedule that keeps the Q1 FEC filing at zero while genuine commitments exist.

Key tension: Whether a second $0 FEC filing in mid-April is diagnostic proof of inflated fundraising claims or evidence of a sophisticated disclosure-delay structure that could produce a large Q2 disclosure after the claim has already served its political signalling purpose.

Sources:Federal Election Commission

Mentions:Mitchell Nobel →FEC →Jesse Spiro →Tether →Cantor Fitzgerald →Fellowship PAC →

First Reported In

Update #2 · First votes exceed every forecast

Federal Election Commission· 12 Apr 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

This Event

Fellowship PAC Shows Zero in Federal Filings

A second consecutive $0 quarterly filing would confirm that the PAC's $100 million claim is either political theatre or structured through intermediaries designed to avoid disclosure.

Led to

Fellowship PAC: $11m filed, $89m missing

Fellowship PAC's prior $0 filings set the expectation that the 15 April Q1 filing would resolve the $100M claim, and the $11M disclosure directly updates that finding.

Occurred 15 Apr 2026

Read story →

Fellowship PAC cash halves in a month

Extends the PAC's earlier $0-filings-vs-$100m-claim story with its first disclosed cash decline.

Occurred 30 May 2026

Read story →

Different Perspectives

Missouri voters

Missouri voters rejected Proposition A by 61.83% to 38.17% at 95% reporting, repealing the 2025 map that split Kansas City. Trump carried the state, yet its 2022 lines now stay for future elections too.

Senate Leadership Fund (SLF)

SLF reported about $43.9m of independent expenditures from 27 October to 1 November, almost all against Democrats, including $12.37m against Sherrod Brown. Seven of its ten targets won; Dan Osborn lost in Nebraska and two are uncalled.

Richard Hudson, chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee

Hudson, who runs House Republicans' campaign arm, conceded North Carolina's 9th District to Richard Ojeda before any AP call. Democrats lead 10 of the state's 14 House districts on the unofficial feed.

Department of Justice (DOJ)

DOJ lost before Judge David O. Carter on 28 October and a 9th Circuit panel on 30 October on its demand to set aside 20,000 California ballots, and says it will appeal the Alaska dismissal. No court has set a ballot aside.

Senator Dan S. Sullivan

Sullivan, who trails Mary Peltola 48.2% to 47.9% on first choices, told CNN he would accept the result. DOJ's suit to stop Alaska certifying anyone but him was dismissed on 1 November.

Scott Colom's campaign

Colom's campaign estimates that about 15,000 affidavit ballots remain to be counted in a race he leads by roughly 65 to 100 votes. Those ballots count only if voters confirm their ID or eligibility by 5pm on 10 November.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.