Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
US Midterms 2026
5NOV

Federal judge orders HB 1 back into use

2 min read
00:50UTC

Chief Judge Stephen R. Clark ordered Missouri to run the 3 November election on its suspended congressional map, hours after the US Supreme Court had declined to lift that suspension.

PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

Clark ordered Missouri onto the suspended map, then refused to shield its secretary of state from the state court.

Chief Judge Stephen R. Clark of the Eastern District of Missouri granted four Republican plaintiffs a temporary restraining order on 8 September, directing the state to run the 3 November election on HB 1⁠1. Robert Onder and three other Republican plaintiffs brought the suit. A temporary restraining order is the fastest instrument a federal judge has, issued to hold a position for days rather than to resolve a case, and Clark issued his within hours of the US Supreme Court declining to disturb the state court's contrary ruling.

Missouri therefore had two live commands pointing in opposite directions on the same afternoon. The state court had struck HB 1 down and sent it to voters; Clark ordered it used. The Eighth Circuit declined to stay his order on 9 September, holding that it lacked jurisdiction over a restraining order of that kind rather than deciding whether Clark was right.

Secretary of State Denny Hoskins then asked Clark to go further and enjoin the Missouri Supreme Court itself, invoking the All Writs Act, a statute that lets federal judges issue orders protecting their own authority. Clark refused on comity grounds, the principle that one court does not casually command another. He had given Hoskins the map he wanted and declined to give him cover against the judges who had taken it away, which left the secretary of state holding a federal order and no protection from the state bench that had suspended the law.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

A federal judge and Missouri's own Supreme Court gave Missouri two opposite instructions on the same map in the same week. Judge Clark, hearing a case from Republican voters, ordered the state to use HB 1, the newer map state lawmakers had passed. Missouri's Supreme Court had already paused HB 1 and told the state to use the older 2022 map instead. When Hoskins tried to get Clark to also block the state Supreme Court from enforcing its own order, Clark said no. Federal judges generally cannot tell a state's own courts what to do, even when a related federal case is running at the same time.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Missouri's redistricting fight ran on two separate tracks at once: a state case testing whether HB 1 was validly enacted, and a federal case testing whether voters' equal protection rights required a particular map be used. Nothing forced those two cases into a single forum, so a federal judge and a state Supreme Court reached opposite conclusions about which map governs, in the same week.

That split-track structure exists because state and federal courts have concurrent jurisdiction over different legal theories arising from the same facts. Hoskins could win on one track and lose on the other, which is exactly what happened.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    With Clark refusing to reach the state court, Missouri's map dispute stayed split across two separate judicial systems with no single forum resolving both at once.

  • Meaning

    Clark's TRO gave HB 1 a second, independent federal basis beyond the legislature's own enactment, which is part of why the Supreme Court's later stay of that TRO mattered on its own terms.

First Reported In

Update #17 · Missouri's election chief held in contempt

CourtListener· 15 Sept 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
Missouri voters
Missouri voters
Missouri voters rejected Proposition A by 61.83% to 38.17% at 95% reporting, repealing the 2025 map that split Kansas City. Trump carried the state, yet its 2022 lines now stay for future elections too.
Senate Leadership Fund (SLF)
Senate Leadership Fund (SLF)
SLF reported about $43.9m of independent expenditures from 27 October to 1 November, almost all against Democrats, including $12.37m against Sherrod Brown. Seven of its ten targets won; Dan Osborn lost in Nebraska and two are uncalled.
Richard Hudson, chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee
Richard Hudson, chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee
Hudson, who runs House Republicans' campaign arm, conceded North Carolina's 9th District to Richard Ojeda before any AP call. Democrats lead 10 of the state's 14 House districts on the unofficial feed.
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Department of Justice (DOJ)
DOJ lost before Judge David O. Carter on 28 October and a 9th Circuit panel on 30 October on its demand to set aside 20,000 California ballots, and says it will appeal the Alaska dismissal. No court has set a ballot aside.
Senator Dan S. Sullivan
Senator Dan S. Sullivan
Sullivan, who trails Mary Peltola 48.2% to 47.9% on first choices, told CNN he would accept the result. DOJ's suit to stop Alaska certifying anyone but him was dismissed on 1 November.
Scott Colom's campaign
Scott Colom's campaign
Colom's campaign estimates that about 15,000 affidavit ballots remain to be counted in a race he leads by roughly 65 to 100 votes. Those ballots count only if voters confirm their ID or eligibility by 5pm on 10 November.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.