Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
US Midterms 2026
17OCT

Trump's voting order blocked for good

2 min read
17:30UTC

Judge Denise Casper in Boston turned her injunction of Trump's 31 March voting executive order into a permanent block, ruling the president has no authority over how states run elections.

PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

A permanent injunction removes Trump's voting executive order as a route to his citizenship-check goal.

Judge Denise Casper, a federal district judge in Boston, converted her earlier injunction of Donald Trump's 31 March voting executive order into a permanent block on Wednesday 24 June, ruling that the president has no authority over how states run their elections⁠1. The order had sought to impose a documentary proof-of-citizenship requirement and other voting changes by executive fiat. Casper's ruling landed the same day the Sixth Circuit shut the litigation route to detailed voter files.

The executive order had already been largely blocked in the spring, when courts enjoined most of its provisions; Casper's ruling makes that block permanent and removes the order as a fallback. The White House has meanwhile stopped issuing new election-related executive orders, having signed none through the late-April window when its programme first stalled. Election policy has shifted instead into the courts, where The Administration keeps losing, and into Congress, where it is stuck.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Back in March, Trump signed an executive order trying to change how states run elections, including a rule about proof of citizenship for voters. Judges in three different courts quickly blocked most of it, ruling that a president cannot rewrite election rules by decree because the Constitution gives that power to states and Congress instead. One judge, Denise Casper in Boston, had only paused the order temporarily while the case continued. She has now made that pause permanent, meaning this version of the order cannot come back into force unless a higher court reverses her.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Trump's 31 March voting order cannot be reissued in its original form without a higher court reversing Casper, closing off the one provision, the DHS and DOGE voter-file review, that had continued operating.

First Reported In

Update #11 · Money uncapped, ballot rules untouched

ABC News· 1 Jul 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
This Event
Trump's voting order blocked for good
The permanent block removes the executive order as a fallback route to the administration's proof-of-citizenship voting goal.
Different Perspectives
James Talarico's campaign
James Talarico's campaign
Talarico's campaign reported raising $56.34m in the quarter to Ken Paxton's $10.17m, and says he has been off the trail since 30 September with flu. Texas PAC, whose only donor is SLF, has spent $131.5m in the race, more than twice what the campaign spent.
Senate Majority PAC, spokesperson Lauren French
Senate Majority PAC, spokesperson Lauren French
French said on 8 October that the Democratic super PAC was watching Kansas closely, but its booked airtime covers nine states and Kansas is not one. Whether SMP spends there decides if Adam Hamilton's 13-to-1 fundraising edge meets outside Republican money alone.
Brad Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State
Brad Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State
Raffensperger's office reported 188,667 in-person votes on the first day of early voting, a midterm record. He expects turnout to challenge 2022's near 4m.
Sam Hayes, North Carolina State Board of Elections
Sam Hayes, North Carolina State Board of Elections
Hayes's board reported 1,392 SAVE flags, about 0.02% of the roll, and says no voter will be removed automatically. The board is asking flagged voters to cancel or prove citizenship by letter, while eligible voters keep the right to vote on 3 November.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune
Senate Majority Leader John Thune
Thune, the Senate's Republican leader, said the government-paid ads should not be funded by taxpayers. His objection puts the party's own Senate leadership against the administration on the DHS spending.
The White House and Donald Trump
The White House and Donald Trump
The White House calls the five DHS ads public-service announcements with no call to action; Trump called them "rather standard", then said his political fundraising would pay. A White House official said there are no immediate plans to repay.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.