Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
US Midterms 2026
15SEP

Silver Bulletin puts Trump net approval at -20.6

2 min read
14:21UTC

Data desk

PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

Presidential approval reached its worst point of either term, and the vote-intention average may be conservative.

Silver Bulletin's average put Donald Trump's net approval at minus 20.6 on 3 August, the lowest figure recorded in either of his terms, on approval of 36 per cent against disapproval of 35. Strong disapproval stood at 47.6 per cent and strong approval at 20.8.

Intensity is doing the work here rather than the topline. A gap of that size between the two strong categories describes an electorate whose opposition is far more mobilised than its support, and mobilisation is what decides midterms.

A methodological note travelled with the reading and deserves more attention than the number. Around sixty per cent of recent generic-ballot surveys sample registered rather than likely voters, and Silver Bulletin's authors judge that correcting for it would move the average above its current level. Likely-voter screens have more often shifted results toward Republicans in recent cycles, so a correction running the other way is the unusual part. For readers weighing the structural Republican advantage in maps and cash, that advantage is being assembled against a position still deteriorating underneath it.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Net approval subtracts the share of people who disapprove of a president from the share who approve. At minus 20.6 it is the worst figure recorded for Trump in either presidency. The other measure here asks which party people intend to vote for in congressional elections. Pollsters can survey everyone registered to vote or try to identify who will actually turn out, and the second method usually flatters Republicans. Most current polls use the first, so the Democratic lead may be understated.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Strong disapproval at 47.6 per cent against strong approval of 20.8 describes asymmetric intensity rather than a shift in topline preference, and intensity determines who turns out in a midterm year.

The likely-voter question compounds it. Likely-voter screens have flattered Republicans in recent cycles; on this reading they now run the other way.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    A record-low approval reading raises the number of districts ratings services are likely to move toward Democrats.

  • Meaning

    The published generic ballot may understate rather than overstate the Democratic position, reversing the usual direction of polling error concern.

First Reported In

Update #15 · Trump's pick is being outspent in a safe seat

Silver Bulletin· 4 Aug 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Department of Justice (DOJ)
DOJ appealed to the 9th Circuit after Judge David O. Carter did not rule by a noon deadline on 22 October that DOJ itself had set, seeking to have California set aside mail ballots from more than 20,000 listed voters. Its case is that ineligible votes cancel lawful ones; the panel dismissed the appeal 2-1 on 26 October.
Lower Costs Now
Lower Costs Now
Lower Costs Now reported $7.37m in Kansas on 24 and 25 October, part of $65.65m in Senate races since its first independent expenditure on 1 October, including $17.21m for Josh Turek in Iowa. Its FEC filings show $50.18m raised by 14 October.
MAGA Inc
MAGA Inc
MAGA Inc, the super PAC aligned with Donald Trump, filed $7.20m against James Talarico on 22 October, taking its Texas spending to $37.65m. Of that, $30.12m is against Talarico and $7.53m is for Ken Paxton, the Republican nominee.
Senate Majority PAC (SMP)
Senate Majority PAC (SMP)
SMP's pre-general report shows it spent $108.70m from 1 to 14 October, including $65.0m to WinSenate and $10.0m to Texas Forever, and ended with $32.72m. Texas Forever has reported $19.40m against Ken Paxton since 1 October.
Senate Leadership Fund (SLF)
Senate Leadership Fund (SLF)
SLF's pre-general report shows $88.42m in cash on 14 October and $18.98m raised in the fortnight, none of it from Elon Musk. It has since reported $12.07m against Sherrod Brown in Ohio, and its $2.7m to Plains PAC preceded that committee's first Kansas buy on 25 October.
National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC)
National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC)
The NRSC's pre-general report shows nothing spent with Ashley Hinson in Iowa, or with its nominees in six other states, from 1 to 14 October, after $5.54m with Hinson in September. It took no new loan and ended the fortnight with $25.20m in cash and $20m of debt.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.