Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
Is Britain Actually Broke?
7OCT

Thirty-six councils wait, none of them confirmed

2 min read
12:52UTC

MHCLG's guidance page, updated on 18 August, names 36 English authorities and gives every one of them the same status: support agreed in-principle.

EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

Every one of the 36 councils is still waiting for a capitalisation direction.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) updated its Exceptional Financial Support guidance for 2026-27 on 18 August 2026, and the page names 36 English authorities sharing a single status: "support agreed in-principle", with final amounts and capitalisation directions to follow "once confirmed"⁠1. Exceptional Financial Support is the arrangement an English council enters when it cannot balance its budget and needs central government's permission to do something it is normally barred from doing. On the page as updated, no authority has that permission in final form.

MHCLG has issued no capitalisation direction to any of the 36 authorities, which is the written permission a council needs before it can cover day-to-day running costs by borrowing or by selling assets. Until MHCLG issues one, a council's section 151 finance officer is budgeting against a promise. The support was agreed in principle in February. Six months on, the paperwork that turns the promise into money a treasurer can rely on is outstanding for every authority on the list.

The list carried 35 authorities when the page first appeared on 23 February 2026 and 36 by 18 August, the addition being the Isles of Scilly at £0.926m, with identical status wording at both dates. Nothing else about the cohort changed across those six months.

No section 114 notice, support agreement or capitalisation direction was published anywhere in this window. A section 114 notice is the formal declaration a council's finance officer issues when the books cannot be balanced, and the most recent on this record remains Nottingham's third, in March. A resident meanwhile notices none of the paperwork, only the library opening hours, the bin round and the state of the road.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

When a council cannot balance its budget, it can apply to the government for Exceptional Financial Support, essentially permission to borrow or sell assets to plug the gap rather than cut services immediately. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) keeps a public list of which councils have this support. As of 18 August, that list names 36 councils in England, and every one of them is marked as only agreed "in principle", meaning the government has said yes to the idea but has not yet signed off the actual amount or the specific deal. None of the 36 has reached that final stage.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Exceptional Financial Support requires two separate government decisions: an in-principle agreement that a council may access support, and a later capitalisation direction that fixes the amount and terms. The first decision can be made on a council's own projected shortfall; the second requires MHCLG to agree the specific capital receipts, borrowing or asset sales that will fund it, a negotiation with no statutory deadline attached.

That two-stage design means a council can sit indefinitely between the two decisions without breaching any rule, because "agreed in-principle" carries no expiry date and no requirement to convert to a confirmed direction within a fixed period.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    Six months after the cohort was first named, no council on the 36-authority list has a confirmed support amount.

  • Consequence

    Councils cannot finalise medium-term budget plans that depend on Exceptional Financial Support until their capitalisation direction is confirmed.

First Reported In

Update #3 · Debt ratio fell; borrowing missed by £2.3bn

Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government· 3 Sept 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
Conservative Party
Conservative Party
Leader Kemi Badenoch said Labour will run out of money and proposed lifting defence to 3% of GDP, paid for from welfare. Shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately put those savings at £23bn, "just the start".
Reform UK
Reform UK
Treasury spokesman Robert Jenrick pledged £80bn a year of spending cuts by the end of the next parliament and claimed £30bn a year of interest savings. The Spectator judged that the sums still do not fully add up.
Centre for Policy Studies
Centre for Policy Studies
The right-of-centre think tank argued on 4 October that Britain is not a low-tax country once workplace pensions and student-loan repayments are counted. Its comparison rests on 2019 data.
Institute of Economic Affairs
Institute of Economic Affairs
The free-market think tank argued on 28 September that alcohol, tobacco and landfill duties raised £5.2bn less than the OBR projected. That comparison is separate from the five-month borrowing overshoot.
Resolution Foundation
Resolution Foundation
The centre-left think tank said on 8 September that about £1 in every £12 of public spending now goes on debt interest. In July it put headroom against the fiscal rules at about £10bn.
Audit Scotland
Audit Scotland
It reported on 17 September that three Scottish budgets planned ScotWind drawdowns and drew nothing each time. It warned that using one-off receipts to balance annual budgets can weaken spending control.