Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Iran Conflict 2026
1MAR

Brent jumps 7%, rial hits record low

2 min read
19:00UTC

Brent crude spiked almost 7% intraday to $97.47 on 1 June after Iran suspended talks, settling at $94.98; the rial hit a record 1,746,000 to the dollar as Lloyd's held its Hormuz war-risk line.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Oil and the rial both moved on Iran's walkout, yet Lloyd's kept Hormuz war-risk locked.

Brent Crude, the global oil benchmark, spiked almost 7% intraday to $97.47 on Monday 1 June once Iran suspended talks, its highest since the $98.83 Bandar Abbas bounce on 26 May , yet it settled lower at $94.98, up 4.2% on the day, as the Lebanon ceasefire pared the gain 1. The jump came on a formal Iranian diplomatic act, not a missile, so the risk premium now tracks the negotiating table rather than the battlefield. A 7% move translates to roughly 12 to 15p a litre for UK drivers within a fortnight.

The Iranian rial hit a record 1,746,000 to the dollar on Iran's open market by 2 June, from 1,705,000 on 31 May , a 2.4% depreciation in two days that accelerated after the suspension 2. Imported food, medicine and fuel cost more in rial overnight, and for Iranians on fixed wages savings erode in days. The same Iranian act split the two markets: Brent rallied while the rial fell, because traders read deal-breakdown risk where ordinary Iranians read a worsening economy.

Lloyd's of London kept its Hormuz war-risk designation unchanged , holding the two-market split that has run since the conflict began. Lloyd's Joint War Committee can de-list the strait of Hormuz only on a UN Security Council resolution or a government certification letter, a structural trigger no sentiment can shift; futures, by contrast, price the odds of a press release. So crude can rally on a thaw while marine insurance stays frozen, because the two answer to different triggers.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Two different markets were tracking the same conflict on 1 June and reached opposite conclusions. The oil futures market, where traders bet on the price of crude oil, drove Brent crude up by nearly 7% when Iran suspended talks, then back down when the Lebanon ceasefire was announced, ending the day 4.2% higher. Oil futures respond to headlines within minutes because traders can buy or sell in seconds. Lloyd's of London, founded in London in 1688, runs the specialist market that insures ships against war damage. It left its high-cost 'war-risk' designation on the Strait of Hormuz unchanged, as it has throughout the conflict. Lloyd's cannot de-list Hormuz just because a ceasefire looks possible; it needs a formal UN Security Council resolution or a government certification letter. None has arrived. The result is that oil traders think the risk is easing while the insurers who cover the actual ships think nothing has changed. The Iranian rial (Iran's currency) fell to a record low of 1,746,000 per dollar on Iran's open market by 2 June. That means ordinary Iranians buying imported food, medicine or electronics face rapidly rising prices, regardless of what diplomats are negotiating.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The Lloyd's/futures split has a specific institutional cause: Lloyd's Joint War Committee operates on the basis of 'listed areas' that require a formal government certification process to de-list. That process requires either a UN Security Council resolution certifying the end of hostilities, or a letter from a government with jurisdiction over the area.

Neither the US government, which runs the blockade, nor Iran, which controls the strait, has issued such a letter. With Russia and China vetoing any UNSC resolution, the bureaucratic unlock is structurally blocked for the duration of the conflict. This is not risk-model inertia; it is a deliberate institutional design that was built after the 1988 Tanker War specifically to prevent Lloyd's from being repriced by political headlines rather than verified security conditions.

First Reported In

Update #115 · Iran moves first, Trump moves by phone

CBS News· 2 Jun 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Markets
Markets
Brent crude rose 2.2 per cent to $96.34 on 10 June, reversing a 7 per cent weekly decline built on deal optimism, as the overnight exchange repriced the Strait of Hormuz risk premium in a single session. The move reflects transit-risk repricing rather than supply shock: Iran's exports had already collapsed to below 300,000 barrels per day.
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan's Naqvi channel, the only mediation track carrying both civilian and military buy-in, was stress-tested by live ordnance within 48 hours of the 6-7 June Tehran visit. Whether Washington informed Islamabad of the imminent strike plan while Naqvi was in Tehran remains undisclosed, putting the channel's neutrality under scrutiny.
Kuwait
Kuwait
Kuwait hosted the third Iranian strike on its soil since the 3 June airport drone attack, with Ali Al Salem airbase targeted in the three-country salvo. Its recent $1.98 billion Anduril Anvil counter-drone purchase signals it is rearming rather than reconsidering its hosting posture.
Bahrain
Bahrain
Bahrain absorbed the IRGC barrage via PAC-3 intercepts with its magazine already at 87 per cent depletion and no resupply before 2027. Sounding air-raid sirens over Manama, it faced the intercept burden with the thinnest defensive stack in the Gulf coalition.
Jordan
Jordan
Jordan reported all five incoming missiles intercepted with no injuries and no damage, a clean defensive performance that strengthens Amman's case for staying in the Western coalition without escalating its own posture. It now sits on Iran's target list for the first time despite not being a party to the Abraham Accords confrontation.
Iran / IRGC
Iran / IRGC
Foreign Minister Araghchi posted on X that US forces should 'leave our region if you want to be safe' and framed the exchange as a US defeat, while the IRGC claimed 21 targets hit and an F-35 hangar destroyed. The claims serve a domestic and Arab-audience framing rather than a verified battle-damage assessment.