Skip to content
Iran Conflict 2026
31MAR

Brent above $116, set for record month

2 min read
08:23UTC

Brent crude advanced above $116, up 72% from pre-war levels and heading for its largest monthly increase on record. Markets are pricing prolonged conflict, not resolution.

ConflictAssessed
Key takeaway

Markets are pricing prolonged war, not imminent resolution.

Brent crude advanced above $116 per barrel on 30 March, approximately 72% above its pre-war level of $67.41. 1 The monthly gain is heading for a record. Goldman Sachs maintained a $14 to $18 per barrel geopolitical risk premium is baked into the price. Global stock markets extended their selloff as Houthi entry and the US military build-up stoked prolonged-conflict fears.

The price trajectory tells the story of a market that has abandoned hope of a quick resolution. Brent settled at $112.57 on 28 March , already elevated by Houthi entry. Trump's oil seizure statement, the third consecutive Houthi attack on Israel, and Pentagon confirmation of ground operations planning pushed it above $116 two days later.

AIS tracking data paints a bleaker picture than headline prices suggest. Shadow fleet vessels account for 80% of Hormuz transits in March, up from 15% in February . Legitimate commercial traffic has effectively stopped: approximately three transits per 24 hours against a pre-war baseline of 138. The Hormuz 'reopening' is a reorganisation of traffic to benefit non-US-aligned operators, denominated in yuan, under IRGC naval supervision.

The 6 April deadline for Trump's power plant strike threat is six days away. If the deadline passes without diplomatic movement and the 82nd Airborne stages forward from Kuwait, Goldman's risk premium estimate will need revision upward. Every dollar on Brent translates to approximately 2.5 pence per litre at UK petrol pumps within a week.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Brent crude is the main international benchmark for oil prices. Before the war started, a barrel of oil cost $67. By 30 March it cost over $116. That is a 72% increase in one month. Higher oil prices feed through into everything: petrol and diesel costs, heating bills, the price of food and goods that are transported, and the cost of making plastic and chemicals. The monthly increase is on track to be the largest in recorded history. Goldman Sachs, the US bank that tracks commodity prices, says there is an extra $14 to $18 on every barrel just because of the war risk. The closer US ground forces get to Iran's oil export terminal at Kharg Island, the higher the risk premium is likely to rise.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    The 6 April power plant strike deadline, with no diplomatic movement, risks a further price spike beyond Goldman's current risk-premium estimate if Trump follows through.

  • Consequence

    The IEA's 400 million barrel emergency release has not stabilised prices. Markets are treating this as a structural supply disruption, not a temporary spike amenable to reserve releases.

First Reported In

Update #52 · Trump wants Iran's oil; 3,500 Marines land

Bloomberg· 30 Mar 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
South Korean financial markets
South Korean financial markets
South Korea, which imports virtually all its crude oil, is absorbing the war's economic transmission most acutely among non-belligerents. The second KOSPI circuit breaker in four sessions — with Samsung down over 10% and SK Hynix down 12.3% — reflects an industrial economy unable to reprice energy costs that have risen 72% in ten days. The market response indicates Korean industry cannot sustain oil above $100 per barrel without margin compression across manufacturing, semiconductors, and shipping.
Migrant worker communities in the Gulf
Migrant worker communities in the Gulf
The first confirmed civilian deaths in Saudi Arabia — one Indian and one Bangladeshi killed, twelve Bangladeshis wounded — fell on communities with no voice in the military decisions that placed them in harm's way. Migrant workers live near military installations because that housing is affordable, not by choice. Bangladesh and India face the dilemma of needing to protect nationals who cannot easily leave a war zone while depending on Gulf remittances that fund a substantial share of their domestic economies.
Azerbaijan — President Ilham Aliyev
Azerbaijan — President Ilham Aliyev
Aliyev treats the Nakhchivan strikes as a direct act of war against Azerbaijani sovereignty, placing armed forces on full combat readiness and demanding an Iranian explanation. The response is calibrated to maximise international sympathy while stopping short of military retaliation — Baku cannot fight Iran alone and needs either Turkish or NATO backing to credibly deter further strikes.
Oil-importing nations (Japan, South Korea, India)
Oil-importing nations (Japan, South Korea, India)
The Hormuz closure is an existential threat. Japan, South Korea, and India receive the majority of their crude through the strait — they will bear the heaviest economic cost of a war they had no part in.
Global South governments (Indonesia, Brazil, South Africa)
Global South governments (Indonesia, Brazil, South Africa)
Neutrality was possible when the targets were military. 148 dead schoolgirls made it impossible — no government can explain that away to its own citizens.
Turkey
Turkey
Has absorbed three Iranian ballistic missile interceptions since 4 March without invoking NATO Article 5 consultation. Each incident narrows Ankara's political room to continue absorbing without Alliance-level response.