Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
17AUG

IRGC claims a radar kill at Ali al-Salem

2 min read
15:37UTC

The IRGC says a 22nd-wave drone strike destroyed an early-warning radar and an MQ-9 shelter at Ali al-Salem Air Base. Kuwait has confirmed no part of the claim.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Iran says it destroyed a radar and drone shelter at Ali al-Salem; Kuwait confirms nothing.

Iran's IRGC, the Revolutionary Guards, claimed a 22nd-wave drone strike on Ali al-Salem Air Base in Kuwait, saying it destroyed an early-warning radar and an MQ-9 drone shelter and set several drones alight 1. Kuwait has confirmed none of it. The Artesh, Iran's conventional army, had already claimed Ali Al-Salem on 16 July, logging that strike as the tenth phase of Operation Saeqeh . Two Iranian services have now put their names on the same Kuwaiti base within four days, under two separate campaign banners.

Ali Al-Salem lies west of Kuwait City and hosts US air operations, among them the MQ-9 Reaper, a long-endurance armed surveillance aircraft flown without a crew aboard. Of the two claims, the radar matters more. Early-warning radars cue the air defences Kuwait has been firing since the middle of the month, and a gap in that coverage would show up as slower interception rather than as a headline. Kuwaiti radars have been targeted before: drones hit Kuwait International Airport's radar in March, on the same day two of seven drones got through at Ahmed al-Jaber Air Base .

The claim reached the public through Press TV, the Iranian state broadcaster, with no independent verification attached. The specificity is doing persuasive work rather than evidential work: naming a radar type and a shelter reads as more credible than a round casualty number while staying just as impossible to check from outside Kuwait. What Kuwait has itself confirmed this week runs to a plant on fire, an airport that stopped, and citizens told to use less water.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran's Revolutionary Guard says it destroyed an early-warning radar and a shelter for an American surveillance drone at a Kuwaiti air base. Kuwait has not confirmed any of this, so treat it as an Iranian claim rather than a verified event. This is the second unconfirmed IRGC claim in the same batch of statements, alongside the Jordan strike claim, both issued from the same Press TV report.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    A second same-day unconfirmed IRGC claim, on top of the Jordan claim, suggests the IRGC is running a coordinated messaging push rather than reporting on discrete verified strikes.

First Reported In

Update #157 · IAEA takes up Darkhovin as utilities become targets

Press TV· 20 Jul 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
IRGC claims a radar kill at Ali al-Salem
An early-warning radar, if genuinely destroyed, would degrade the interceptor cueing Kuwait has leaned on all week.
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Kpler counted five Hormuz transits on 16 August against 31 the previous weekend, while Windward logged four vessels going AIS-dark for up to a month; underwriters price both the attacks and a sanctions register that names their counterparties in unreadable scanned images. Two trackers now measure only the ships that consent to be seen.
China
China
China sits at the end of the payment chain the 14 August designation targets: Iran's shadow banking network exists to convert sanctioned oil sales, much of it to Chinese refiners, into usable funds. Beijing has previously refused to recognise OFAC's jurisdiction over its own entities buying Iranian crude, leaving this designation to test compliance rather than change trade.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's foreign ministry denied on 16 August holding any Iranian pilots alive, contradicting Iranian General Mohammad Bagherzadeh's claim that Doha holds three Su-24 aircrew, and said it had recovered only one set of remains. Qatar carries Iran's messages to Washington, and this is a public break with Tehran over a fact only one aircrew inquiry can settle.
Oman
Oman
Oman's shipping-map talks, covering monitoring, environment and maritime services, were publicly decoupled from any Hormuz reopening by Iran's own foreign minister on 17 August. Muscat's mediation channel keeps functioning on the narrow file it was given, while the political decision it hoped to unlock stays with Iran's security council.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia separately called the recurrence of tanker attacks on Emirati shipping a dangerous escalation, breaking from the UAE's repeated formula. Riyadh speaking in its own name over an attack on another state's vessels signals it reads the pattern differently from Abu Dhabi's flat statements.
United Arab Emirates
United Arab Emirates
The UAE foreign ministry condemned a third ADNOC-linked tanker attack on 15 August in language identical, word for word, to its statement the day before. Three consecutive strikes on Emirati shipping have not moved Abu Dhabi's public wording by a single adjective.