Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
26JUL

160 prisoners freed on each side

1 min read
12:01UTC

Russia and Ukraine each freed 160 soldiers on 26 June in an Emirati-brokered exchange; the freed Russians had been held in Belarus.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

The humanitarian swap track keeps working while ceasefire talks stall, and the freed Russians came from Belarus.

Russia and Ukraine each freed 160 soldiers on 26 June in an exchange brokered by the United Arab Emirates, the Gulf state that has mediated several swaps in the war 1. The freed soldiers had been held since 2022, and the released Russians had been held on Belarusian soil 2.

The exchange continues a track that has kept moving even as ceasefire talks stalled. Istanbul Round 2 on 2 June agreed a 1,200-for-1,200 swap , and Ukraine completed the war's largest single exchange, a 1,000-prisoner deal, on 24 May . The Emirati channel has been the constant facilitator across the conflict, producing agreed lists faster than the Russia-Ukraine bilateral track alone. That the released Russians were held in Belarus threads this swap back into the week's Belarus story.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Russia and Ukraine swapped prisoners of war again, 160 soldiers each, on 26 June. The exchange was arranged with help from the United Arab Emirates, which has repeatedly stepped in to broker these swaps throughout the war. The freed Russian soldiers had been held in Belarus rather than Ukraine, a detail that shows how tangled up Belarus has become in the war despite formally staying out of the fighting.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    That freed Russian soldiers were held in Belarus, not Ukraine, underlines how deeply Minsk's territory and personnel are entangled in the war despite formal non-belligerence.

First Reported In

Update #22 · Belarus relays go dark on Kyiv's deadline

CNN· 2 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Hormuz shipping and insurance market
Kpler, Lloyd's List and S&P Global each independently put Strait of Hormuz transits at a seventh to a sixth of pre-war levels, against CENTCOM's own position that the strait remains open for transit. War-risk premiums rose from 0.25% to 3-10% of hull value in mid-July and have held steady since.
Pakistan (with China)
Pakistan (with China)
Iran's interior minister met Pakistan's army chief in Islamabad on 25 July, his second visit in ten days, with China separately pushing the same track; Islamabad's stated precondition, a halt to Gulf attacks, broke within hours when the Houthis struck Yanbu and Jazan. The channel inherits Baghdad's opening without yet fixing what broke it.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia absorbed Houthi strikes on Aramco-linked sites at Jazan and Yanbu on 25 July without confirming them, while holding a 30-year civil nuclear agreement Trump made conditional on joining the Abraham Accords two days after signing it. Riyadh is fighting on one front while being asked to concede on another.
Iran (state security leadership)
Iran (state security leadership)
Iran's security chief said strikes continue until the enemy's "total surrender", and no IRNA, Tasnim or Fars report carries any stand-down language to match Washington's pause. Tehran reads the halt as "strategic decision-making fatigue", not a restraint it needs to reciprocate.
Washington (Pentagon and White House)
Washington (Pentagon and White House)
A Defense Department source called the bombing halt "on a hold", Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell insisted the US "retains a deep arsenal of capabilities", and the White House credited "successful sanctions" and thirteen days of strikes for the same pause. Three explanations from one government suggest none of them is the whole one.
Oil traders
Oil traders
Sent Brent down 2.29 per cent to $98.38 a barrel on reports that mediation was reviving, moving the price on CENTCOM's quiet night rather than on Trump's same-day promise of a bigger operation with no deadline attached.