Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
19JUL

Hormuz transits rise to an eighth of normal

2 min read
14:05UTC

Lloyd's List Intelligence counted 84 weekly transits through the Strait of Hormuz on 7 August, up from 45. A normal week carries more than 700.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Hormuz traffic doubled to a level still far below a working waterway.

Lloyd's List Intelligence counted 84 vessel transits through the strait of Hormuz in the week to Friday 7 August, up from 45 the week before, in figures relayed by the Associated Press 1. A normal week carries more than 700.

Three independent trackers had already put crossings at about 15% of normal on 24 July , so the rebound restores a fraction of a fraction. War-risk underwriters price off demonstrated passages rather than announcements, and two counts this low both sit inside the noise band of a chokepoint that usually moves a hundred vessels a day. A doubling gives them a second data point, not a trend.

Lloyd's List has not published the split between tankers, gas carriers and general cargo. Energy trade resuming would show up in that breakdown; a return of general cargo would mean something much smaller. Without it, the rise cannot be read either way.

Charterers cannot fix a voyage against a route with no published text, which means the extra crossings most likely reflect operators who had already accepted the risk rather than new entrants coming back. If next week's count falls towards July's levels, this one reads as convoy movement rather than recovery.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Shipowners weigh risk to the vessel, crew, cargo and insurance before they enter the strait. Their decisions determine the traffic count. The number almost doubled in one week, but 84 ships is still far below the more than 700 that normally cross. The route remains badly constrained.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    The count shows more movement than the preceding week but no return to normal shipping capacity.

  • Risk

    Further incidents or unclear route rules may stop the recovery before tankers resume normal schedules.

First Reported In

Update #168 · Iran replaces the man who set its terms

Associated Press· 11 Aug 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
China's foreign ministry
China's foreign ministry
Spokesman Lin Jian rejected Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's 25 August warning that Iranian oil buyers face an "economic D-Day", saying sanctions do not help and that Beijing would safeguard its own rights and interests. China's Iranian crude imports had already halved for unrelated reasons.
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Erbil authorities said 10 explosive-laden drones were shot down over the city on 1-2 September with no casualties. Iraq's government condemned the attacks without naming Iran as their source, and neither Washington nor Baghdad confirmed the IRGC's claim to have hit US bases there.
Bahrain Defence Force
Bahrain Defence Force
The General Command said air defences intercepted several Iranian missiles and drones on 1-2 September and called the use of such weapons against civilians and private property a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law.
Kuwait's Fire Force and foreign ministry
Kuwait's Fire Force and foreign ministry
KUNA reported a hostile Iranian drone struck a residential complex in Kuwait City on 2 September; Fire Force spokesman Brigadier General Mohammad Al-Gharib said losses were confined to property. Kuwait's foreign ministry called the attack a clear breach of its sovereignty.
Jordan's Armed Forces
Jordan's Armed Forces
Petra carried a statement that air defences intercepted eight missiles violating Jordanian airspace early on 31 August and 10 of 13 fired on 1 September. The statement named no target and did not address the IRGC's claim to have struck Camp Titin and killed US personnel.
CENTCOM
CENTCOM
CENTCOM's 1 September target list named IRGC air defence, radar, maritime and mine-laying sites in Iran but no tanker, after Axios reported anonymous officials describing a Trump-approved "tanker for tanker" drone policy. A CENTCOM spokesman declined to confirm the policy and referred questions to policymakers.