Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
22JUN

Hormuz transits rise to an eighth of normal

2 min read
09:56UTC

Lloyd's List Intelligence counted 84 weekly transits through the Strait of Hormuz on 7 August, up from 45. A normal week carries more than 700.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Hormuz traffic doubled to a level still far below a working waterway.

Lloyd's List Intelligence counted 84 vessel transits through the strait of Hormuz in the week to Friday 7 August, up from 45 the week before, in figures relayed by the Associated Press 1. A normal week carries more than 700.

Three independent trackers had already put crossings at about 15% of normal on 24 July , so the rebound restores a fraction of a fraction. War-risk underwriters price off demonstrated passages rather than announcements, and two counts this low both sit inside the noise band of a chokepoint that usually moves a hundred vessels a day. A doubling gives them a second data point, not a trend.

Lloyd's List has not published the split between tankers, gas carriers and general cargo. Energy trade resuming would show up in that breakdown; a return of general cargo would mean something much smaller. Without it, the rise cannot be read either way.

Charterers cannot fix a voyage against a route with no published text, which means the extra crossings most likely reflect operators who had already accepted the risk rather than new entrants coming back. If next week's count falls towards July's levels, this one reads as convoy movement rather than recovery.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Shipowners weigh risk to the vessel, crew, cargo and insurance before they enter the strait. Their decisions determine the traffic count. The number almost doubled in one week, but 84 ships is still far below the more than 700 that normally cross. The route remains badly constrained.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    The count shows more movement than the preceding week but no return to normal shipping capacity.

  • Risk

    Further incidents or unclear route rules may stop the recovery before tankers resume normal schedules.

First Reported In

Update #168 · Iran replaces the man who set its terms

Associated Press· 11 Aug 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance industry
Shipping and insurance industry
UKMTO counted about 20 US-facilitated Hormuz transits a day to 11 September against only 6 visible on AIS, with traffic still around 90% below the 138-a-day pre-war baseline. War-risk underwriters cannot price hulls they cannot see, or resolve whether the tanker El Gaia hit a mine, as Iran claims, or a missile and drone, as CENTCOM says.
European refiners
European refiners
European refiners, including Poland's Orlen, absorbed a roughly $26 gap between Dated Brent at $130.80 on 15 September and ICE Brent futures settling at $103.87 on 18 September, a spread that widened from $13.45 on 9 September rather than newly opening. Their futures hedges no longer cover what they now pay for physical barrels.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Aramco zeroed European term customers' October allocations and rerouted roughly 60 million barrels to Asia through Ras Tanura and Sohar, using Red Sea and Gulf terminal capacity built years ago to cut Hormuz exposure. Riyadh reallocated existing supply rather than negotiating a shortfall with Europe.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's energy minister Saad al-Kaabi told Bloomberg at the Qatar Economic Forum on 20 September that Bessent's two-year Hormuz-obsolescence forecast is wrong, and that Doha has deliberately built no bypass pipeline. Qatar's gas exports run through one waterway by choice, not oversight.
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran's foreign ministry and 130 Majlis deputies moved toward NPT withdrawal this week, with lawmaker Hossein-Ali Haji Deligani filing a triple-urgency bill on 20 September that Speaker Qalibaf has not yet scheduled. Tehran treats treaty membership as leverage still on the table, not yet spent.
Russia and China
Russia and China
Moscow and Beijing vetoed the Panel of Experts' renewal, maintaining Resolution 2231 lapsed in October 2025 and the 2025 snapback was never validly triggered, so the sanctions architecture the Panel enforces has no current legal standing. Both governments frame the veto as upholding law, not shielding Tehran.