12JUN

Oil Retreats From Peak Amid Ceasefire Speculation

1 min read

09:18UTC

Brent crude eased to $110.47 from its $116 peak, but remains 64% above pre-war levels with the strait operating at a fraction of normal capacity.

← Back to Trump halts strikes, touts deal Iran denies Jump to analysis ↓

ConflictAssessed

Key takeaway

Markets priced in ceasefire hope; the supply disruption remains.

Brent Crude traded at $110.47 per barrel, retreating from the $116 peak on 28 March. The pullback may reflect ceasefire hopes from the Islamabad talks, though the fundamental supply picture has not changed. the strait of Hormuz remains over 90% below pre-war transit volumes at 53 weekly transits against a baseline of 966.

The price remains roughly 64% above pre-war levels of $67.41 per barrel. Analysts had warned that $150 per barrel was possible if the strait stays closed another month. The Islamabad Accord's immediate-reopening provision is the first diplomatic instrument that directly addresses the oil price mechanism, which may explain why markets have responded to the framework's existence even before Iran has accepted it.

The modest retreat should not be mistaken for normalisation. The IEA, IMF, and World Bank jointly described this as one of the largest supply shortages in energy market history . That assessment has not changed.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Oil prices dropped slightly from their highest point of the war, possibly because traders think the new Pakistan peace plan might work. But prices are still about 64% higher than before the war started. The strait that most of the world's oil passes through is still barely open. If the peace plan fails, prices could rise sharply again.

What could happen next?

Markets pricing in ceasefire probability; failure would trigger sharp reversal

Sources:CNBC

Mentions:Brent Crude →Strait of Hormuz →Iran →Islamabad →Pakistan →IMF →World Bank →

First Reported In

Update #60 · Pakistan's Ceasefire Plan Fills the Vacuum

CNBC· 6 Apr 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

Global Energy Bodies Declare Historic Supply Shortage

IEA/IMF/World Bank calling this the largest supply shortage in energy market history (ID:1986) contextualises the oil price retreat as modest relative to the underlying disruption.

Occurred 4 Apr 2026

Read story →

This Event

Oil Retreats From Peak Amid Ceasefire Speculation

The price retreat, while modest, is the first sustained pullback since the war began. It suggests markets are pricing in a non-zero probability of ceasefire from the Islamabad talks. However, with Hormuz at roughly 5% of pre-war transit volumes, the fundamental supply disruption remains unchanged.

Different Perspectives

Oil markets and Lloyd's of London

Brent fell to $89.25 on ceasefire probability, not new barrels, with traders voting for Trump's deed over Tehran's denial. Lloyd's has not repriced Hormuz war-risk cover because its trigger requires a UN Security Council resolution or government certification, so tanker insurance costs remain elevated regardless of the spot move.

Pakistan and Qatar mediators

Pakistan's Mohsin Naqvi was in Tehran for his second visit in under a week, using the Pakistan-Qatar channel that delivered April's ceasefire after an identical public-denial cycle. The channel carries both civilian and military buy-in from Islamabad, the only configuration Iran's split command cannot dismiss as a partial signal.

India

India summoned the US Deputy Chief of Mission after three Indian sailors were killed aboard MT Settebello, the first formal grievance from a major non-belligerent directed at US enforcement. Indian seafarers supply roughly 12 per cent of the global maritime workforce; their presence on third-flag Gulf tankers is structurally inevitable regardless of bilateral diplomacy.

Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)

The IRGC declared Hormuz closed on 11 June while civilian negotiators were on the same mediation channel, then issued no public comment on the MoU framework. Its silence on the framework, rather than any foreign ministry statement, is the operative approval signal; the corps' unilateral Hormuz closure shows it did not treat the diplomatic track as binding on its operations.

Iran foreign ministry (Baghaei)

Esmail Baghaei told IRNA that reports of a finalised deal were 'merely speculation' and that Iran had 'not yet made a final decision'. The denial is structurally identical to Iranian foreign ministry statements during the April ceasefire talks, which produced a binding text within 48 hours of the same language.

Trump administration / CENTCOM

Trump cancelled the third strike day and called the MoU 'very strong' and almost ready to sign, while CENTCOM kept tanker enforcement running in the same 24-hour window. The administration is simultaneously withdrawing the military pressure it claims drove the deal and sustaining the enforcement campaign it is trying to trade away.