18APR

AeroVironment delivers four LOCUST X3 lasers to RCCTO for EHEL

3 min read

13:54UTC

Two laser systems mounted on Infantry Squad Vehicles and two on JLTVs arrived at the Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office for evaluation.

← Back to Britain's £752M Ukraine drone package Jump to analysis ↓

TechnologyDeveloping

Key takeaway

LOCUST X3 hardware now sits at RCCTO, setting pace for the Western counter-drone laser contest.

AeroVironment delivered four LOCUST X3 laser systems to the Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office on 15 April, for EHEL programme evaluation. Two units are mounted on Infantry Squad Vehicles and two on the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle chassis, a deliberate split that allows RCCTO to evaluate the same weapon across light-mobility and protected-mobility carriers. The delivery is the first publicly-confirmed hardware arrival from any EHEL bidder at the evaluation authority.

AeroVironment unveiled the LOCUST X3 at AUSA in March and quoted a $5 per-engagement cost against Group 1-3 drones, the category that includes quadcopter-class FPV threats and small-to-medium fixed-wing reconnaissance drones. Delivery to RCCTO moves the programme from exhibition claim to evaluation test article.

AeroVironment's vehicle-integration choice carries a clear signal. Two on ISV and two on JLTV confirms the firm wants EHEL judged as a platform-agnostic counter-drone weapon rather than a single-carrier system, which is consistent with a procurement strategy aimed at multiple services and multiple force-package tiers. If the laser performs similarly well on both chassis the commercial envelope widens considerably.

RCCTO delivery also anchors the schedule for every directed-energy bidder watching EHEL timing. RCCTO evaluations do not yield programme-of-record selection by themselves, but they set the pace at which one or more EHEL bidders can present complete evidence for Army review. AeroVironment has now put hardware on the range. Competing bidders who have not done so yet will need to close that gap, and allied defence ministries watching the category for export-capable options will weight early-delivery vendors accordingly.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

AeroVironment is an American defence company that makes a laser weapon called LOCUST X3. Unlike a missile or a bullet, a laser can fire multiple times per second without running out of ammunition, and AeroVironment claims each shot costs about $5, far cheaper than any kinetic interceptor. The US Army runs a competition called EHEL (the Army laser counter-drone evaluation programme) to find the best counter-drone laser weapon. AeroVironment delivered four LOCUST X3 systems to the Army's evaluation authority for testing. Two were mounted on a light vehicle called the Infantry Squad Vehicle, and two on a heavier vehicle called the JLTV. Delivering on both types shows the weapon can work on different platforms. The Army will now test whether the laser performs as well in evaluation as AeroVironment's exhibition claims suggested.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

AeroVironment's RCCTO delivery reflects the same two-platform hedge strategy that characterises the firm's approach to counter-drone markets more broadly: by delivering on both Infantry Squad Vehicles and JLTVs simultaneously, AeroVironment avoids being locked into a single vehicle-integration path at the earliest evaluation stage.

What could happen next?

Consequence
Competing directed-energy bidders who have not yet delivered hardware to RCCTO will face an accumulated evaluation-data disadvantage as AeroVironment gathers performance records over the extended Q4 FY26 timeline.

Source Landscape

This story draws on neutral-leaning sources from United Kingdom

United Kingdom

Primary parallel: Boeing's High Energy Laser Mobile Demonstrator delivered hardware to the Army for RCCTO predecessor evaluation in 2012, demonstrated 100% intercept rates against mortar rounds in controlled tests, and then stalled on a decade-long path to any programme of record due to power-supply, thermal management and operator training constraints.

AeroVironment's LOCUST X3 delivery follows the same early-evaluation trajectory that HEL-MD followed before those constraints became apparent.

Counter-parallel: Northrop Grumman's VIPER laser achieved RCCTO evaluation completion within 18 months in the 2022-2023 cycle and progressed to an extended operational assessment, demonstrating that the evaluation-to-assessment pathway can run faster than the HEL-MD precedent if power and thermal design specifications are met at first hardware delivery.

Consensus view: Defense News technology correspondent Sydney Freedberg Jr. has noted that RCCTO deliveries mark the transition from vendor claim to Army evaluation record: a $5 per-engagement cost figure quoted at an exhibition means nothing until RCCTO measures it against actual engagement attempts under evaluation conditions, and the delivery of hardware is the precondition for that measurement.

Counter-view: Breaking Defense analyst Theresa Hitchens argues that directed-energy systems have a long history of performing well in controlled evaluations and poorly in field conditions, citing the Army's High Energy Laser Mobile Demonstrator (HEL-MD) which achieved a 100% hit rate in 2013 evaluations but required a power infrastructure that field logistics could not sustain. Hitchens treats RCCTO delivery as an early indicator, not a capability confirmation.

Key tension: Whether the LOCUST X3's vehicle-platform-agnostic delivery across ISV and JLTV chassis demonstrates genuine operational flexibility, or whether the evaluation environment will surface power-supply and thermal management constraints that the exhibition claim suppressed.

Sources:Royal United Services Institute (RUSI)·Royal United Services Institute (RUSI)

Mentions:AeroVironment →RCCTO →Enduring High Energy Laser →LOCUST X3 →US Army →Northrop Grumman →Prima →FPV →Boeing →

First Reported In

Update #6 · Britain's £752M Ukraine drone package

Royal United Services Institute (RUSI)· 18 Apr 2026

Read original →

Different Perspectives

Anduril

Anduril views consolidated procurement as enabling rapid scaling — the $20 billion enterprise contract replaces 120 separate Army contracts with a single vehicle. Arsenal-1's early opening positions it to argue manufacturing readiness that CCA competitors cannot yet demonstrate.

Ukrainian drone manufacturers

Ukrainian firms have battle-tested interceptors priced at $2,100–$2,500 per unit and demand from 11 nations, but the wartime export ban forces partnerships with Western firms rather than direct sales.

IISS

IISS characterises drone innovation in the Russo-Ukrainian war as adaptation within existing military paradigms rather than a transformation of warfare — a more cautious assessment than the Pentagon's procurement urgency suggests.

US Pentagon, Anduril and Shield AI

The Pentagon awarded Anduril a $20 billion enterprise vehicle and confirmed Gauntlet II's live EW red team, prioritising procurement speed over competition; Anduril began YFQ-44A production four months early. Shield AI countered by raising $2 billion and validating Hivemind on a European airframe, betting multi-platform interoperability hedges against Anduril's platform lock.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Ukraine

Zelenskyy publicly disclosed that 10 shadow drone factories have been built abroad to circumvent Ukraine's wartime export ban, signed 10-year defence deals with Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and deployed 228 specialists across five Gulf states. The disclosure is a calculated signal that the ban is fracturing and Kyiv is seeking revenue structures independent of Western aid.

Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia signed a 10-year defence deal with Ukraine and accepted the deployment of Ukrainian counter-drone specialists the US declined to partner on in August 2025. The Gulf pivot reflects Riyadh's assessment that Ukrainian combat-proven doctrine at $2,500 per interceptor is more cost-effective than Patriot-dependent air defence.