Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Drones: Industry & Defence
20AUG

Gauntlet II sets five-week build sprint

2 min read
16:38UTC

The Pentagon's 19 Gauntlet II finalists gather at Fort Carson, Colorado in August, each given about five weeks to build 120 lethality-payload drones, with officials expecting to order 50,000 to 60,000 more from the top performers.

TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

Nineteen finalists build 120 drones each in five weeks at Fort Carson, chasing a 50,000-unit follow-on order.

The Pentagon's 19 Gauntlet II finalists will gather at Fort Carson, Colorado in August, each given about five weeks to build 120 lethality-payload drones. Gauntlet II is the US military's competitive drone build-off, run to find suppliers who can manufacture attack drones at wartime rates rather than merely demonstrate a good prototype. Fort Carson, a US Army installation, hosts the sprint that turns the contest from paper claims into hardware on a bench.

Defence officials expect to order 50,000 to 60,000 more drones from the top performers, plural. That plural is the operative word. The field was cut to 19 firms on 2 July , and spreading a 50,000-unit order across several of them rather than a single champion is the clearest operational expression of the distributed-award pattern running through the week's contracts. The buyers want many suppliers who can produce at rate, and the sprint is how they find out who actually can.

The rules carry forward from earlier stages. Gauntlet Stage 1 tested 49 companies and set a bar on Chinese-sourced motors and batteries , a supply-chain condition the Fort Carson finalists must still meet. The programme opened at Camp Grayling on 8 June , so the August sprint is the next gate in a contest designed from the start to reward manufacturing depth over a single clever design.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The Pentagon is running a competition called Gauntlet II to find companies that can mass-produce cheap, armed drones. Out of 49 companies that originally entered, 19 finalists now have to travel to Fort Carson, an army base in Colorado, and actually build 120 of these drones in about five weeks, rather than just describe what they could build. Officials say the companies that do this well could then be asked to build 50,000 to 60,000 more. For readers, this is the US military testing suppliers by making them prove they can deliver at speed under pressure, before committing to the far bigger order that would follow.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The five-week Fort Carson build sprint is only reachable because of a filter the Pentagon already applied at Gauntlet II's first stage: Camp Grayling's 20 June cut from 49 to 19 finalists carried forward a requirement barring Chinese-origin components, meaning every surviving firm has already demonstrated it can source airframes and electronics without the cheaper Shenzhen-linked supply chains most commercial drone makers still depend on.

That earlier filter, not the five-week deadline itself, is what makes the sprint's 120-unit target realistic rather than aspirational.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    Gauntlet II's Fort Carson sprint functions as a live production audition rather than a paper evaluation, testing whether finalists can actually build at the pace a 50,000-60,000-unit order would require.

  • Consequence

    Finalists already screened for non-Chinese-origin components must now prove they can scale that supply chain under time pressure, not just source it in small volumes.

First Reported In

Update #15 · Two $500m drone deals, still no winner

The Defense Post· 14 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
South Korea's Defense Acquisition Program Administration
South Korea's Defense Acquisition Program Administration
DAPA folded drone and roadside-bomb jammers into an 18-year, KRW 3.448 trillion K2 tank upgrade approved 11 August, rather than fund counter-drone kit as its own programme. Seoul is treating the threat as permanent enough to write into a platform's lifecycle, not urgent enough to buy ahead of it.
NATO Support and Procurement Agency
NATO Support and Procurement Agency
NSPA named five pre-qualified counter-drone suppliers under new framework contracts on 27 July, giving allies a purchasing route with no published budget attached. A framework without committed money is an instrument waiting for a spending decision, not a guarantee one is coming.
Ukraine's Ministry of Defence
Ukraine's Ministry of Defence
Ukraine's forces strike with more than 70 AI and computer-vision systems drawn from over 200 domestic producers, the ministry said on 18 August, a supplier base neither Washington's tariff fight nor Beijing's export licence touches. Kyiv is scaling capability faster than either government is writing rules for it.
A European drone-component manufacturer
A European drone-component manufacturer
A European manufacturer selling components into the United States faces the same 100 per cent tariff and 3 September deadline as any other foreign supplier, with the duty-free onshoring carve-out available only to firms building on American soil. That leaves it to absorb the cost, relocate assembly, or cede the US market rather than shop around a rival supply chain.
Chinese drone component exporters
Chinese drone component exporters
Exporters now need a case-by-case licence for each US-bound dual-use shipment after MOFCOM's 5 August order, with no published review clock. The same week Shenzhen logged nearly 200,000 domestic logistics-drone sorties and Hunan reported record spraying coverage, a home market large enough to absorb what the licence regime slows from leaving the country.
US drone manufacturers
US drone manufacturers
The onshoring carve-out protects Performance Drone Works' $820 million War Department loan, but the same 3 September deadline hits Red Cat Holdings and Unusual Machines, both filing over 500 per cent revenue growth on 6 August, on Chinese-sourced components with no qualified domestic substitute yet.