Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Drones: Industry & Defence
5JUL

Hegseth watches five laser weapons fire

2 min read
10:21UTC

Pete Hegseth watched five laser and microwave weapons fire at White Sands on 23 June, the first sitting US defence secretary to attend such a test.

← Back to UK's £5bn drone bet follows Healey's exitJump to analysis ↓
TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

Hegseth watched five directed-energy weapons fire, a bet on cheap shots against cheap drones.

Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth watched five directed-energy (DE) weapons fire live at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, on 23 June, the first sitting US defence secretary to attend such a demonstration 1. Directed-energy weapons use lasers or microwaves rather than munitions. The line-up ran from AeroVironment's AMP-HEL laser at 20 kilowatts, through nLight's 50-kilowatt DE-M-SHORAD and Lockheed Martin's 300-kilowatt IFPC-HEL Valkyrie, to two microwave systems: Epirus's Leonidas and Raytheon's Coyote high-power microwave (HPM) Block 3.

A laser pulse costs a few dollars; the one-way attack (OWA) drone it burns down costs thousands, and a kinetic interceptor to stop that same drone can run to millions. Only cost-per-shot survives contact with drone mass, which is why a defence secretary turned up to watch electrons do the work.

AMP-HEL comes from the same AeroVironment now digesting a Space-segment writedown, a reminder that the DE contenders are the same names carrying the sector's production strain. France has already bought into the European end of this market, ordering Latvian BLAZE interceptors in June . The kilowatt figures, though, are demonstration numbers; the Army does not expect fielded systems at scale until late 2027, leaving years of dependence on the expensive interceptors lasers are meant to replace.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Pete Hegseth is the US Defence Secretary. On 23 June he became the first person in that job to personally watch a live test of laser and microwave weapons designed to shoot down drones and missiles. Five different weapons fired at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico: three lasers of increasing power, made by AeroVironment, nLight and Lockheed Martin, and two microwave weapons, from Epirus and Raytheon, which disable electronics across a wider area rather than burning through a single target. The idea is that these weapons cost only a few dollars per shot, far less than a missile that does the same job, which matters when an enemy can launch many drones at once cheaply.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The structural driver is an interceptor supply constraint, not laser enthusiasm: US industry's PAC-3 MSE production capacity has been targeted at roughly 500-600 missiles a year even after recent expansion, while a single large drone or missile salvo can involve well over 100 munitions, so the kinetic interceptor base cannot physically produce enough rounds to match salvo volume.

Directed-energy weapons are being fast-tracked specifically to close that mismatch with a cost-per-shot that scales with raid size rather than production-line capacity, which is why the demonstration paired five different systems, lasers and microwave weapons alike, rather than backing a single design.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Continued reliance on cost-per-shot economics rather than fielded systems means US forces stay dependent on expensive kinetic interceptors for salvo defence until directed-energy weapons reach scale, not expected before late 2027.

Sources:The Defense News
Mentions:Pete Hegseth →New Mexico →AeroVironment →Lockheed Martin →Epirus →Raytheon →France →Coyote →Mexico →BLAZE →Israel →
First Reported In

Update #14 · UK's £5bn drone bet follows Healey's exit

The Defense News· 5 Jul 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
Caused by
France buys a Baltic interceptor drone
France's June order of Latvian BLAZE interceptors preceded the US directed-energy demonstration by a week.
Occurred 17 Jun 2026
Read story →
This Event
Hegseth watches five laser weapons fire
The demonstration put cost-per-shot at the centre of counter-drone policy, the only economics that holds against thousands of cheap attack drones.
Different Perspectives
Procurement sceptics
Procurement sceptics
Two identically sized IDIQs to different primes within seven weeks, and a five-nation pact where one partner moves weeks ahead of the rest, could just as easily read as an industrial base still improvising vendor mix as a deliberate hedging doctrine. Neither ceiling appears sized against a validated requirement yet.
Chinese component suppliers
Chinese component suppliers
FCC and Pentagon-level restrictions on Chinese-origin airframes and motors have progressively excluded DJI-linked suppliers from federal counter-drone catalogues, narrowing the field JIATF-401 and Gauntlet II can buy from to a short list of certified domestic bidders. Beijing reads the exclusions as protectionism dressed as security policy.
Quantum Systems
Quantum Systems
Blackstone, Airbus, Advent and Noteus reportedly priced the Munich drone maker at $8 billion, more than double its prior mark, on the strength of 19,000 Ukraine missions rather than confirmed revenue. It is betting production capacity, not current sales, is what buyout capital is now paying for.
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Britain released the first LEAP effector money three weeks after its defence secretary quit over the size of the drone budget, splitting £3.16 million across three small firms rather than one contractor. It expects the other four LEAP partners to follow its pace, not set their own.
JIATF-401
JIATF-401
The task force handed AeroVironment a $500 million counter-drone ceiling identical to Perennial Autonomy's from seven weeks earlier, while its own Gauntlet II red team prepares to attack the drones the winners of that sprint will build. It expects to keep several qualified suppliers warm rather than certify one.
DroneShield
DroneShield
DroneShield appointed retired Rear Admiral Lee Goddard as an independent director from 1 July, its second board move since founder Oleg Vornik's April exit. The ASIC probe into November's disclosures and share sales stays open, so the admiral steadies the story without closing the file.