14JUL

Patch Tuesday clean streak hides out-of-band KEVs

3 min read

08:46UTC

Microsoft's 13 May Patch Tuesday shipped 120 CVEs with no zero-days exploited in the wild, breaking what would have been a 22-month streak since July 2024. Two out-of-band KEV additions inside 48 hours reset the picture.

← Back to One operator worked both ransomware brands Jump to analysis ↓

TechnologyDeveloping

Key takeaway

Two out-of-band KEVs in 48 hours show Patch Tuesday is no longer the reliable cadence.

Microsoft released its May 2026 Patch Tuesday on Wednesday 13 May with 120 CVEs addressed and no zero-days exploited in the wild, breaking a 22-month streak in which every Patch Tuesday since July 2024 had contained at least one zero-day ¹ ². BleepingComputer, which tracks the monthly cycle alongside Microsoft Security Response Center disclosures, recorded the gap as the first scheduled release in the streak without an actively exploited flaw.

The headline broke before the picture settled. Within 48 hours of the release, CISA added two further CVEs to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue outside the scheduled window: CVE-2026-20182 in Cisco SD-WAN on Thursday 14 May, and CVE-2026-42897 in Exchange Server's Outlook Web Access on Friday 15 May. Both were actively exploited; only the Cisco flaw had a vendor patch. The Exchange addition mirrored the Palo Alto out-of-band pattern that opened May and ran alongside the Microsoft LSASS out-of-band fix issued in April .

For security operations Teams, the signal-quality question matters. Patch Tuesday was the predictable artefact around which monthly vulnerability-management work was scheduled. A clean Patch Tuesday next to two out-of-band KEVs within two days does not show improved vendor security posture; it shows that the exploitation timeline has decoupled from the scheduled release. The defensive cadence assumption (a 30-day cycle around the second Tuesday of each month) no longer maps to where the urgent disclosures actually arrive. Federal civilian agencies remain bound by Binding Operational Directive 22-01 regardless of when the KEV addition lands, and the Trump administration's FY27 proposal to cut CISA by $707 million does not change the issuance tempo, only the agency's capacity to enforce it.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

On 13 May 2026, Microsoft released its monthly security fixes covering 120 flaws, and for the first time in nearly two years there were no emergency patches for flaws hackers were already using. But within two days, US security authorities added two urgent flaws to their watch list: one in Cisco software and one in Microsoft's own email server.

Source Landscape

This story draws on neutral-leaning sources

Primary parallel: Microsoft's October 2023 Patch Tuesday, which included a zero-day-free release that was similarly followed within days by emergency out-of-band fixes for actively exploited flaws in third-party products. The pattern of a clean scheduled release alongside an out-of-band burst is recurrent rather than exceptional, and the 2026 case follows the same structure.

Counter-parallel: The July 2024 Patch Tuesday that started the 22-month streak contained CVE-2024-38112, a zero-day in Windows MSHTML exploited by APT groups before disclosure. That release established the baseline against which May 2026's clean release is measured.

The two Patch Tuesdays share the same metric framework but represent opposite outcomes within it, illustrating that the metric itself is stable while attacker targeting and vendor disclosure timing continue to shift independently.

Consensus view: Recorded Future's vulnerability intelligence team and BleepingComputer's patch-tracking data both indicate that the 22-month in-the-wild zero-day streak ending on Patch Wednesday 13 May was a product of Microsoft's improved pre-disclosure co-ordination with vulnerability researchers, not a step-change reduction in the underlying bug rate, since out-of-band KEV additions immediately followed.

Counter-view: KEV Breen at Immersive Labs argues the headline metric, zero zero-days in Patch Tuesday, is structurally misleading: the 120-CVE release included nine critical-severity RCEs, several of which Breen's team assesses as likely exploited before disclosure based on their technical profile. The absence of confirmed in-the-wild exploitation may reflect detection gaps rather than genuine exploitation absence.

Key tension: The 22-month streak is itself a product of Microsoft's decision to announce exploitation status at Patch Tuesday disclosure, a process it controls. Two out-of-band KEV additions within 48 hours, for Cisco and Exchange, show that the exploitation tempo has not changed; only the labelling cadence has, raising the question of whether the streak was an artefact of Microsoft's disclosure process rather than attacker behaviour.

Sources:BleepingComputer·Tenable

Mentions:Microsoft →CISA →Palo Alto Networks →Known Exploited Vulnerabilities →Cisco →Trump administration →CVE-2026-20182 →Outlook Web Access →BleepingComputer →May Patch Tuesday →CVE-2023-50224 →BOD 22-01 →

First Reported In

Update #4 · AI joins the breach column on both sides

BleepingComputer· 20 May 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

This Event

Patch Tuesday clean streak hides out-of-band KEVs

The Patch Tuesday metric has stopped being a reliable signal of vulnerability disclosure tempo. Exploitation has migrated from the scheduled release cycle to the out-of-band window where defenders have less notice.

Led to

200 fixes, six zero-days, late Exchange

May Patch Tuesday's 120-CVE zero-zero-day release broke a 22-month streak; June's 200-CVE six-zero-day reversal is a direct contrast used to frame the magnitude of the month's patch burden.

Occurred 9 Jun 2026

Read story →

Different Perspectives

UK managed service providers and data centre operators

Newly brought into critical-infrastructure scope by the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill's Lords second reading, facing fines up to £17m or 4% of global turnover and a new near-miss reporting duty they did not previously carry. The sector moves from best-practice guidance to statutory exposure within this Parliamentary session.

Threat-intelligence industry

SOCRadar's confirmation that one operator sits on two ransomware crews' negotiation panels, following Bitdefender's affiliate-overlap flag six weeks earlier, gives the sector its second independent data point that brand-based tracking undercounts shared access. The firms doing this work are shifting language from named-group attribution toward access-broker mapping.

FSB Centre 16

Named by NCSC as running an SNMP-hijacking campaign against communications, energy, healthcare, defence and financial-services operators, harvesting device data and reconfiguring routers through a decades-old plaintext-authentication protocol. The campaign runs in parallel to, not in place of, the GRU's separate DNS-hijacking operation named in April.

CISA

CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue added seven CVEs between 5 and 14 July, none from a headline security vendor, capped by the 18-year-old Cisco IOS bug CVE-2008-4128. BOD 26-04's risk-tiered listing rules make that slowdown as much a policy artefact as a threat-intensity read.

Nidec

Nidec faces a $2m demand from Blackfield after the crew breached a server at its supplier Chaun Choung Technology rather than Nidec's own network. The attack reached Nidec's data without touching its own perimeter at all, the same supply-chain route World Leaks used against Tata Electronics.

Tata Electronics

Tata Electronics restricted remote access to its purchase-order systems and hired a forensic consultant after World Leaks posted 630GB of its files, including purported Apple and Tesla design material, to a leak site. The exposed value sits on its customers' balance sheets, not its own, which is what makes it hard to price.