Skip to content
Artemis II Moon Mission
9APR

Koch and Hansen Test Orion's Manual Controls in Deep Space

2 min read
15:28UTC

A 41-minute piloting demonstration gave engineers the first human-in-the-loop handling data for a crewed spacecraft beyond low Earth orbit since Apollo.

ScienceDeveloping
Key takeaway

First deep-space manual piloting data since Apollo informs future docking requirements.

Christina Koch and Jeremy Hansen completed a 41-minute manual piloting demonstration on Day 4, testing Orion in six and three degrees of freedom. The demonstration began at 9:09 p.m. EDT, with Koch and Hansen taking turns at the controls. 1

The test extends the piloting programme that began with the proximity demo after launch , where the crew manoeuvred within 10 metres of the ICPS upper stage. That early test validated close-proximity handling; this one measured how the spacecraft responds to manual inputs at translunar distance, where communications delay, different gravitational conditions, and four days of thermal cycling could affect thruster performance.

Commander Reid Wiseman and Pilot Victor Glover are scheduled for an identical demonstration on Day 8. The split design, two crew members now, two later, produces comparative handling data across different mission phases and thermal conditions. For a programme building toward Artemis III, where a crew will need to dock with a lunar lander, manual piloting data from deep space is not a rehearsal. It is the engineering basis for future mission profiles.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Spacecraft on autopilot use computers to maintain their position and course. But in emergencies or when docking with another vehicle, a human pilot needs to take manual control. Orion has a joystick-style controller for this. Koch and Hansen spent 41 minutes testing those manual controls, flying the spacecraft in six degrees of freedom (moving and rotating in all directions) and then in three (rotation only). This is the first time a human has flown a spacecraft by hand in deep space since Apollo. The data tells engineers how the spacecraft handles, which will be critical when a future crew needs to dock with a lunar lander.

What could happen next?
  • Opportunity

    First manual deep-space piloting data since Apollo provides an engineering baseline for Artemis III lunar lander docking profile design.

First Reported In

Update #4 · Day 5: Lunar Gravity Reclaims Humans for the First Time Since 1972

NASA· 5 Apr 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Dual-framework nations
Dual-framework nations
Signing both the Artemis Accords and the ILRS framework is rational hedging, not defection; smaller nations maximise access without exclusive commitment. Lunar governance is genuinely multipolar, and the US coalition count of 61 overstates exclusivity.
NASA
NASA
NASA presented Day 8 as focused on key tests while burying two test cancellations and a seventh anomaly in editor's notes. Engineers found no concerns on final Orion inspections and re-entry is confirmed for 10 April, but the pattern of fine-print disclosure continues to the mission's last day.
ESA
ESA
ESA Director General Aschbacher is holding his Gateway recovery response until the June 2026 Council meeting, keeping $4.4bn in partner contracts in strategic limbo. The European Service Module's flawless performance throughout Artemis II gives ESA genuine technical leverage for that negotiation.
Boeing / Northrop Grumman
Boeing / Northrop Grumman
SLS component production spans more than 40 US states, giving the industrial base strong political protection regardless of commercial alternatives. Congressional mandates guarantee contracts through FY2029, insulating the supply chain from technical programme changes.
NASA Office of Inspector General
NASA Office of Inspector General
The IRB heat shield findings should have been published before launch. The Starship HLS is two years behind schedule with a worsening manual control dispute. NASA has no crew rescue capability for lunar surface operations. The programme is proceeding with documented, unresolved risks.
US: NASA, White House, Congress
US: NASA, White House, Congress
NASA cleared five anomalies with no public dose data and no mention of the cabin alarm. Isaacman's FY2027 proposal designates Artemis the sole protected programme while cutting science 47%; Congress rejected the identical FY2026 top-line, and over 100 members already requested more science funding. OIG audit IG-26-004 found Starship HLS two years late with no crew rescue capability.