Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Artemis II Moon Mission
3APR

Two Storm Forecasting Models Get Their First Live Test

2 min read
12:59UTC

A machine-learning model and a physics simulation are competing to predict solar storms for a crewed mission. The G2 storm arrived on schedule to test them.

ScienceDeveloping
Key takeaway

The G2 storm provides the first live validation test for deep-space solar forecasting models.

University of Michigan researchers deployed 2 solar storm forecasting models for operational testing during the Artemis II transit on 1 April 1. The first is a machine-learning model that uses imagery from SDO (Solar Dynamics Observatory) and SOHO (Solar and Heliospheric Observatory) to generate daily storm probability estimates. The second is a physics-based simulation offering up to 24 hours' advance warning, requiring 3,000 processing units on a NASA supercomputer.

The G2 storm now active provides a live test environment that the research team could not have guaranteed. Apollo had no equivalent forecasting capability. The August 1972 solar particle event that fell between Apollo 16 and 17 arrived without warning. Had a crew been in transit, the consequences could have been severe.

Only the top 5% of solar particle events produce nausea-level radiation exposure 2. The current storm does not appear to approach that threshold. But the value of these models lies not in the storm that does not harm, but in the warning that arrives before the one that could.

If the models issue actionable warnings that align with observed conditions over the next 48 hours, they validate a prediction capability for all future crewed deep-space operations. If they miss, the gap between forecast and reality will itself be instructive data.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Scientists at the University of Michigan have two different computer systems designed to predict dangerous solar storms before they happen. One uses pattern recognition on satellite images of the Sun, similar to how facial recognition software works. The other runs a detailed physics simulation of how solar activity develops. Both are running right now during this mission. The G2 storm that developed provides the first real test of whether their predictions match what is actually happening. If they work, future astronauts could get up to 24 hours warning before a dangerous storm arrives.

What could happen next?
  • Validated solar forecasting models would enable future deep-space crews to pre-position in shielded compartments before storm arrival, potentially halving crew radiation exposure on high-activity missions.

First Reported In

Update #2 · Solar storm threatens Orion beyond Earth

Phys.org / University of Michigan· 3 Apr 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Two Storm Forecasting Models Get Their First Live Test
If either model delivers actionable warnings during the current G2 storm, it validates a new forecasting capability that Apollo entirely lacked.
Different Perspectives
JAXA
JAXA
JAXA is an Artemis Accords signatory with the Lunar Cruiser rover planned for south-pole surface operations; Chang'e 7's first-arrival timeline compresses the window those surface systems were designed to operate in alongside American crew.
Space Research Institute RAS / Roscosmos
Space Research Institute RAS / Roscosmos
The LILEM instrument on Chang'e 7 gives Russia science-cooperation presence at Shackleton's rim with no independent crewed lunar capability on a public timeline. This is Roscosmos's only confirmed path to south-pole science in the current decade.
CNSA / China Manned Space Agency
CNSA / China Manned Space Agency
Chang'e 7 at Wenchang confirmed a second-half 2026 launch for Shackleton rim, 18 to 24 months before any American crewed arrival. The mission carries a Russian LILEM instrument, giving Roscosmos a south-pole science foothold inside China's programme.
Jeremy Hansen / Canadian Space Agency
Jeremy Hansen / Canadian Space Agency
Hansen appeared at the 16 April JSC press conference in his only public moment since splashdown. Canada's Canadarm3 remains without a confirmed deployment host after Gateway cancellation, with CSA maintaining institutional silence on the programme's status.
Airbus Defence and Space
Airbus Defence and Space
Airbus has issued no post-mission ESM performance statement; its press room returned a 404 error on a 14 April check. The only named Airbus engineer quote on the mission appeared in a Nature interview, not a company release.
Daniel Neuenschwander / European Space Agency
Daniel Neuenschwander / European Space Agency
ESA's 11 April statement praised ESM translunar injection precision and omitted the pressurisation valve anomaly; the June 2026 Council is the sole stated review forum. ESM-3 is at KSC without a corrected-baseline disclosure to justify its readiness.