Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
AI: Jobs, Power & Money
22OCT

ver.di bargains over jobs, not pay-offs

2 min read
16:14UTC

ver.di confirmed a 3.3% second-step pay rise from 1 September and opened talks with the employers' association AGV on a sector-wide transformation contract covering site protection, a dismissal ban and retraining.

EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

ver.di wants redeployment and site guarantees, not better terms for being sacked.

ver.di, Germany's services union, confirmed that the second step of its insurance-sector wage deal, a 3.3% rise, took effect on 1 September 2026, and that it has opened a separate negotiation with the employers' association AGV (Arbeitgeberverband der Versicherungsunternehmen, the German insurance employers' body) over a sector-wide Tarifvertrag Transformation⁠1. The draft covers location protection, a ban on operational dismissals and reskilling programmes modelled on Ergo's in-house academy. A third round meets in Wuerzburg in October. Around 2,500 AI-attributed cuts have already been announced across the sector, 1,500 at Allianz Partners and 1,000 at Ergo⁠2.

German redundancy law is strong and it protects the people already inside the building; it has nothing whatever to say about a post that is never advertised. Severance terms are the wrong instrument for a problem that generates no severance, so ver.di has gone after retraining budgets, site guarantees and a commitment to keep the internal door open.

Germany already built the legal frame around AI deployment when the Bundesrat approved the AI Act's national enforcement law in July. Collective bargaining turns that frame into terms an employer must actually observe. A sector-wide Tarifvertrag binds every firm in the employers' association, which is why this negotiation matters more than a works-council deal at a single insurer. If Wuerzburg produces a dismissal ban without a hiring or headcount commitment attached, the contract protects incumbents completely and leaves the entry point exactly as exposed as it was before anyone sat down.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

German insurance workers just got a 3.3% pay rise, but the more significant part of this story is what their union, ver.di, is negotiating next: a separate agreement specifically about AI's effect on jobs. The union wants three things written into a binding contract: protection for where jobs are based, a ban on dismissals linked to the change, and a right to retraining. A third round of talks is due in Wuerzburg in October. What makes this possible is a feature of German labour law that does not exist everywhere: employers have to consult worker representatives before rolling out new technology that changes working conditions, giving unions a seat at the table before decisions are made rather than only a complaint process afterwards.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

German labour law gives unions a lever most of their counterparts elsewhere in Europe do not have. The Works Constitution Act requires employers to consult works councils before introducing new technology that affects working conditions, which is why ver.di can put location protection, a dismissal ban and reskilling on the table as a single negotiated package rather than reacting to job losses after the fact.

That institutional head start is also why Germany's insurance-sector agreement is being watched as a template: the same co-determination structure exists across German industry, so whatever the sector-wide Tarifvertrag Transformation ultimately contains is likely to shape how other German unions frame their own AI-era bargaining demands.

What could happen next?
  • Precedent

    If the sector-wide Tarifvertrag Transformation is signed, it becomes a template other German sector unions are likely to cite in their own AI-era bargaining rounds.

First Reported In

Update #20 · AI closes the hiring door, not the exit

ver.di· 21 Sept 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
This Event
ver.di bargains over jobs, not pay-offs
A union bargaining for retraining and location guarantees rather than severance has decided the adjustment runs through hiring, not redundancy.
Different Perspectives
TSMC
TSMC
The chipmaker raised its 2026 revenue growth forecast to about 44% on 15 October while holding capital spending at $60-64bn. High-performance computing, mostly AI data-centre chips, made up 68% of quarterly revenue, so demand for the hardware behind automation is still rising.
South Korean government
South Korean government
Its statistics office published the first youth figures on the 15-to-34 band set by a revised law, showing a fall of 98,000 against 147,000 on the old band. Including people in their early thirties, whose employment rose, makes the official youth decline look gentler.
Office for National Statistics
Office for National Statistics
The ONS put UK vacancies at 691,000 for July to September and professional, scientific and technical vacancies 11.6% lower on the year. In September it had shown the same sector still adding jobs, so the fall appears in adverts before it reaches headcount.
Chinese government
Chinese government
Officials told a State Council Information Office briefing on 10 October that 10.52 million new urban jobs had been created by September, 87.7% of the annual target. Official figures show investment falling overall but rising in networks, data services and robot output, with urban unemployment at 5.2%.
Tharman Shanmugaratnam
Tharman Shanmugaratnam
Singapore's President, co-chair of the World Bank Jobs Council, urged governments at the Bangkok meetings to make crisis-era youth employment support a standing policy tool. That treats young workers' AI exposure as a lasting budget line rather than a shock to ride out.
Srini Pallia, Wipro
Srini Pallia, Wipro
Wipro's chief executive called AI a long-term growth driver as the company cut 6,716 staff on flat revenue. HCLTech and TCS added staff in the same quarter, so Wipro's cut sits beside its own weak revenue rather than an industry-wide fall.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.