21SEP

ver.di bargains over jobs, not pay-offs

2 min read

16:45UTC

ver.di confirmed a 3.3% second-step pay rise from 1 September and opened talks with the employers' association AGV on a sector-wide transformation contract covering site protection, a dismissal ban and retraining.

← Back to AI closes the hiring door, not the exit Jump to analysis ↓

EconomicDeveloping

Key takeaway

ver.di wants redeployment and site guarantees, not better terms for being sacked.

ver.di, Germany's services union, confirmed that the second step of its insurance-sector wage deal, a 3.3% rise, took effect on 1 September 2026, and that it has opened a separate negotiation with the employers' association AGV (Arbeitgeberverband der Versicherungsunternehmen, the German insurance employers' body) over a sector-wide Tarifvertrag Transformation ¹. The draft covers location protection, a ban on operational dismissals and reskilling programmes modelled on Ergo's in-house academy. A third round meets in Wuerzburg in October. Around 2,500 AI-attributed cuts have already been announced across the sector, 1,500 at Allianz Partners and 1,000 at Ergo ².

German redundancy law is strong and it protects the people already inside the building; it has nothing whatever to say about a post that is never advertised. Severance terms are the wrong instrument for a problem that generates no severance, so ver.di has gone after retraining budgets, site guarantees and a commitment to keep the internal door open.

Germany already built the legal frame around AI deployment when the Bundesrat approved the AI Act's national enforcement law in July . Collective bargaining turns that frame into terms an employer must actually observe. A sector-wide Tarifvertrag binds every firm in the employers' association, which is why this negotiation matters more than a works-council deal at a single insurer. If Wuerzburg produces a dismissal ban without a hiring or headcount commitment attached, the contract protects incumbents completely and leaves the entry point exactly as exposed as it was before anyone sat down.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

German insurance workers just got a 3.3% pay rise, but the more significant part of this story is what their union, ver.di, is negotiating next: a separate agreement specifically about AI's effect on jobs. The union wants three things written into a binding contract: protection for where jobs are based, a ban on dismissals linked to the change, and a right to retraining. A third round of talks is due in Wuerzburg in October. What makes this possible is a feature of German labour law that does not exist everywhere: employers have to consult worker representatives before rolling out new technology that changes working conditions, giving unions a seat at the table before decisions are made rather than only a complaint process afterwards.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

German labour law gives unions a lever most of their counterparts elsewhere in Europe do not have. The Works Constitution Act requires employers to consult works councils before introducing new technology that affects working conditions, which is why ver.di can put location protection, a dismissal ban and reskilling on the table as a single negotiated package rather than reacting to job losses after the fact.

That institutional head start is also why Germany's insurance-sector agreement is being watched as a template: the same co-determination structure exists across German industry, so whatever the sector-wide Tarifvertrag Transformation ultimately contains is likely to shape how other German unions frame their own AI-era bargaining demands.

What could happen next?

Precedent
If the sector-wide Tarifvertrag Transformation is signed, it becomes a template other German sector unions are likely to cite in their own AI-era bargaining rounds.

Source Landscape

This story draws on neutral-leaning sources

Consensus view: Germany's Institute for Employment Research (IAB), the Nuremberg-based federal research body that has tracked task-level automation potential across German industries for over a decade, has consistently rated insurance and financial-services back-office roles among the most substitutable white-collar work in the economy, which is the backdrop against which ver.di is negotiating protections before, not after, job losses appear.

Counter-view: Employer bodies such as AGV typically resist binding dismissal bans on the grounds that a blanket prohibition removes the flexibility firms need to redeploy staff as AI changes which tasks require how many people, arguing that protections should attach to individuals through retraining rather than to job counts through a ban.

Key tension: Whether a sector-wide dismissal ban can meaningfully protect jobs against a general-purpose productivity tool that reduces headcount need gradually across many roles, rather than a specific machine that displaces one identifiable job at a time.

Sources:ver.di

Mentions:ver.di →AGV →Allianz Partners →Ergo →Bundesrat →Germany →EU AI Act →

First Reported In

Update #20 · AI closes the hiring door, not the exit

ver.di· 21 Sept 2026

Read original →

Different Perspectives

Salesforce, Synopsys and TD Bank Group

Salesforce, Synopsys and TD Bank Group each filed quarterly disclosures in late August booking restructuring charges, or none at all, without naming AI as a cause. Their silence matters because Challenger's tracker shows AI as a stated reason fell to fourth place in August even as the year-to-date AI-cut total still leads at 116,175.

Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Indonesia

Singapore launched its Skills and Workforce Development Agency on 16 September, giving citizens six months of free premium AI tools, while South Korea ring-fenced its AI tax windfall in a new Future Response Fund. Taiwan kept funding its AI build past NT$190bn and Indonesia rewired vocational training around AI literacy, betting state-built skills beat a market-led adjustment.

ver.di, CGT Fonction Publique and CCOO

Germany's ver.di banked a 3.3% pay rise on 1 September and opened talks on a Tarifvertrag Transformation covering dismissal bans and reskilling, while France's CGT rejected Paris's AI negotiating timetable the same week. Spain's CCOO went further on 21 September, proposing to tax companies by the jobs they generate rather than wait for the next bargaining round.

BIS General Manager and Federal Reserve governors

The BIS's General Manager said on 10 September that AI displacement remains limited, even as the BIS's own survey found nearly 80% of firms plan to automate roles. Two Federal Reserve governors made the same point in July, arguing the labour-market data does not yet show a mass-firing event.

Bank of Canada, ONS and ECB

The Bank of Canada found the job-finding gap between AI-exposed and unexposed occupations widened from 2.2 to 13.9 percentage points since 2015-19, while separations barely moved. That framing, a hiring freeze rather than a firing wave, is echoed by the ECB's finding that euro-area AI use hit 52% of workers in 2026, concentrated among the university-educated.

Office for National Statistics

Deferred its Transformed Labour Force Survey beyond November 2027 and disclosed a May 2026 telephone-collection failure. The ONS carries no AI-attribution layer at all, so Britain sits outside this month's cohort of measuring states by its own admission.