21SEP

Beijing's AI job plan sets no targets

2 min read

16:45UTC

MOHRSS issued its Action Plan for Adapting to AI Development and Promoting Employment on 15 September, naming three programmes and not one number. Days later it filled a hall with 1,700 employers and 13,000 AI vacancies.

← Back to AI closes the hiring door, not the exit Jump to analysis ↓

EconomicDeveloping

Key takeaway

China published the policy without targets, then ran the recruitment drive anyway.

China's Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security (MOHRSS) issued its Action Plan for Adapting to AI Development and Promoting Employment on 15 September 2026, eight months after saying it intended to ¹. Three programmes are named: creating jobs through AI applications, supporting worker transition and redeployment, and drawing employment out of traditional sectors through AI. None carries a numeric target or a deadline.

That is a retreat from how the same ministry worked in April, when it recognised 42 new AI-related occupations and attached a projected headcount of 300,000 to 500,000 workers to each one . The occupational catalogue gave employers, colleges and provincial labour bureaux something countable to build against. The Action Plan that was promised alongside it has arrived with the countable parts removed.

The ministry's hands moved faster than its paperwork. From 14 to 20 September it ran a dedicated AI recruitment track inside its Hundred-Day Ten-Million campaign, drawing more than 1,700 employers including Tencent, Huawei, DeepSeek, ByteDance and SenseTime, and listing over 13,000 AI openings within a four-sector campaign of 178,000 ². The roles on offer are robotics test engineers, algorithm engineers, chip designers and application developers: the build side of the industry, not the displaced side.

One worker's account runs against the grain of the hall. Fei Zhaojun, a 40-year-old programmer, told Fortune he was laid off with roughly 160 colleagues two weeks after his manager asked whether AI could soon replace human coders ³. It is a single account of one unnamed company and it settles nothing about a labour market of this size. A job fair advertising 13,000 openings and a programmer counting 160 departures describe two ends of the same industry, and the ministry's plan sets no number against either.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

China's labour ministry published a plan on 15 September about helping workers adapt to AI, with three named programmes but no numbers attached, no target for how many jobs it expects to create or protect. A few days later, the same ministry ran a week-long AI hiring drive that did produce numbers: more than 1,700 employers and over 13,000 AI job openings between 14 and 20 September. The ministry shows its hand on the concrete hiring event it can point to as evidence of progress, while avoiding, in the policy document itself, a specific numeric promise that would be easy to hold it to later.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

Chinese central ministries typically issue directional action plans without numeric targets, then leave the quantified detail to provincial and municipal implementing rules that follow months later. Naming a specific job-creation number in a national plan creates a publicly measurable commitment; leaving it out defers that accountability while still allowing the ministry to claim it acted.

A slowing economy, with 2026 growth guidance already set at its lowest since the 1990s, raises the cost of a missed numeric target and correspondingly raises the incentive to keep this document directional rather than measurable.

Sources:Tencent News·People's Daily

Mentions:China Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security →Tencent Holdings →Huawei →DeepSeek →ByteDance →SenseTime →Fortune →China →Beijing →

First Reported In

Update #20 · AI closes the hiring door, not the exit

Tencent News· 21 Sept 2026

Read original →

Different Perspectives

Salesforce, Synopsys and TD Bank Group

Salesforce, Synopsys and TD Bank Group each filed quarterly disclosures in late August booking restructuring charges, or none at all, without naming AI as a cause. Their silence matters because Challenger's tracker shows AI as a stated reason fell to fourth place in August even as the year-to-date AI-cut total still leads at 116,175.

Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Indonesia

Singapore launched its Skills and Workforce Development Agency on 16 September, giving citizens six months of free premium AI tools, while South Korea ring-fenced its AI tax windfall in a new Future Response Fund. Taiwan kept funding its AI build past NT$190bn and Indonesia rewired vocational training around AI literacy, betting state-built skills beat a market-led adjustment.

ver.di, CGT Fonction Publique and CCOO

Germany's ver.di banked a 3.3% pay rise on 1 September and opened talks on a Tarifvertrag Transformation covering dismissal bans and reskilling, while France's CGT rejected Paris's AI negotiating timetable the same week. Spain's CCOO went further on 21 September, proposing to tax companies by the jobs they generate rather than wait for the next bargaining round.

BIS General Manager and Federal Reserve governors

The BIS's General Manager said on 10 September that AI displacement remains limited, even as the BIS's own survey found nearly 80% of firms plan to automate roles. Two Federal Reserve governors made the same point in July, arguing the labour-market data does not yet show a mass-firing event.

Bank of Canada, ONS and ECB

The Bank of Canada found the job-finding gap between AI-exposed and unexposed occupations widened from 2.2 to 13.9 percentage points since 2015-19, while separations barely moved. That framing, a hiring freeze rather than a firing wave, is echoed by the ECB's finding that euro-area AI use hit 52% of workers in 2026, concentrated among the university-educated.

Office for National Statistics

Deferred its Transformed Labour Force Survey beyond November 2027 and disclosed a May 2026 telephone-collection failure. The ONS carries no AI-attribution layer at all, so Britain sits outside this month's cohort of measuring states by its own admission.