Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
2026 FIFA World Cup
25JUL

Iran player's US visa runs out

3 min read
11:57UTC

Mehdi Torabi's single-entry US visa expired after Iran's New Zealand draw, putting the midfielder's availability for Belgium on 21 June in doubt and moving the access crisis onto the pitch.

SportDeveloping
Key takeaway

A single-entry visa and a cross-border base mean Iran must clear Torabi through US immigration before he can play Belgium.

Iran midfielder Mehdi Torabi was issued a single-entry US visa, unlike teammates on multiple-entry documents, and it expired after Iran's 15 June draw with New Zealand . His availability for Belgium on Sunday 21 June now depends on a re-issue by immigration authorities 1. The squad has said publicly it is "tired" of its treatment, and FIFA president Gianni Infantino visited the dressing room after the New Zealand draw, telling the players he would try to help 2.

Until now the access story ran through fans and officials: ticket allocations revoked under sanctions , 14 federation staff barred from US entry, supporters' flags fought over in court. Torabi is the first documented mid-tournament lapse for a man on the pitch. The mechanism is the single-entry document itself, spent the moment its holder leaves the US after one match. Iran bases outside the country and crosses in on match days, which turns that paperwork detail into a fresh immigration clearance before every fixture.

That changes the nature of FIFA's exposure. The entry refusals that hit fans and staff were ones FIFA could route back to host-government sovereignty, its standing answer all tournament. A registered playing-squad member who cannot enter to play a fixture FIFA scheduled is harder to deflect, because the thing being degraded is the competition on the pitch. Unless the re-issue lands in time, Iran field a weaker XI in a game that may decide their group.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran's squad has faced unusual difficulties travelling to their World Cup matches in the United States. The US government imposes strict immigration restrictions on Iranian nationals as part of sanctions related to Iran's nuclear programme and other disputes. The team has been crossing the border from Tijuana, Mexico, into the US only on the days they have matches. Most players were given multiple-entry visas, meaning they could cross the border and come back again. But one player, midfielder Mehdi Torabi, was given a single-entry visa, which only allows one crossing. After the match against New Zealand on 15 June, his visa expired. He cannot now enter the US for the next match against Belgium on 21 June without a new visa. FIFA president Gianni Infantino visited the team after the New Zealand game and said he would try to help. The squad issued a public statement describing themselves as 'tired' of their situation, a formal collective escalation beyond individual complaints. Whether Torabi gets a new visa in time for the 21 June Belgium match depends on the US State Department, not on FIFA.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The single-entry visa for Torabi, as opposed to the multiple-entry documents issued to teammates, reflects the structural outcome of US sanctions on Iran: consular officers apply heightened individual screening to Iranian nationals and issue the minimum-access document consistent with an approved application. Multiple-entry visas for Iranian nationals require a higher discretionary threshold that not all applicants clear.

The Tijuana cross-border commute model that Iran adopted, under which the squad crosses into the US only on match days, was designed to minimise the number of US entry events. A single-entry visa was compatible with one match; it became incompatible with a second match because the re-entry it would require has no document to support it.

Gianni Infantino's dressing-room visit after the New Zealand match, in which he told players he would 'try to help', is notable because it marks the first time FIFA's president has acknowledged, on the record, that the access chain has produced a specific on-squad consequence rather than an administrative inconvenience.

The shift in Infantino's framing, from deflecting to acknowledging, suggests FIFA's legal team has already assessed that the player-visa lapse creates a qualitatively different exposure than the staff denials.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Torabi's unavailability for the Belgium match on 21 June, if the visa is not re-issued, would mark the first case of a playing squad member being unable to participate in a World Cup fixture due to host-country visa expiry.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Risk

    If Torabi cannot play, FIFA faces a choice between declaring the situation a force majeure event under Iran's participation agreement or accepting that the host government's immigration processing has effectively reduced Iran's squad without formal recourse.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Precedent

    The Torabi case establishes that differential visa-type issuance to players on the same squad can create mid-tournament selection consequences, a gap in future host-country agreement design that FIFA's legal team will need to address for subsequent tournaments.

    Long term · Suggested
First Reported In

Update #24 · USA through, Pulisic out with calf

GiveMeSport· 20 Jun 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Real Madrid
Real Madrid
Operating internally on the basis Rodri joins, according to David Ornstein's reporting, despite no talks having taken place with Manchester City. The gap between internal planning and actual negotiation is itself notable.
Manchester City
Manchester City
Unwilling to sell Rodri, with manager Enzo Maresca stating he returns to the club after back surgery. No club-to-club talks with Real Madrid are taking place, contradicting the framing of a deal in motion.
CONMEBOL
CONMEBOL
Backs the move to a 64-team 2030 tournament co-hosted across South America. Has not engaged publicly with FIFPRO's workload or heat-threshold objections drawn from this tournament's data.
FIFA
FIFA
Points to its 30 June technical and officiating reviews as the authoritative account of the tournament's football, including Collina's rejection of bias claims. Has not publicly responded to the renewed compensation call or disputed FIFPRO's heat-threshold figures.
FIFPRO
FIFPRO
Measures a four-degree gap between its own 28C postponement threshold and FIFA's 32C cooling-break trigger, breached in 19% of matches played. Cites a 70-83 match workload projection to oppose the 64-team 2030 format.
Human Rights Watch
Human Rights Watch
Documents 54 immigration-custody deaths before kickoff and two since, and revives the compensation duty FIFA's own advisers identified after Qatar 2022 and never acted on. Treats the pattern as unresolved FIFA liability, not a closed file.